1887
Volume 29, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The revival in gravity methods stimulated by the availability of reliable positioning and, more importantly, elevation estimation, using relatively low cost GPS methods has transferred the focus on survey accuracy and precision from elevation errors to those implicit in the complete topographic correction. The terrain correction has normally been ignored in low relief terrain since the error in doing so has usually been much less than that related to errors in elevation accuracy. It is now possible to specify and observe gravity surveys that can yield a precision of 0.01 to 0.03 mGal in the Bouguer anomaly in production practice. Unfortunately even quite minor aberrations in local topography near the gravity meter may generate errors in excess of 0.1 mGal and no tight specification is justified unless it also demands detailed description of the local terrain, outlines how to avoid problems, and requires calculation of such corrections as are necessary. This will require a change in observer culture and some suggestions of the scale of the problem and means for avoiding it are given in this paper. There is no doubt that the terrain correction is now the major source of deficiency in gravity survey data bases. The methods used for calculation of the terrain correction also need review and care since digital terrain models are not necessarily of adequate precision or reliability for calculation of the effects close to the observation point.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG998467
1998-09-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anfiloff, V., 1994, Discussion, on: Gravity investigations in mountainous areas. Exploration geophysics, 25, 57–59.
  2. Bhattacharya, B.K., & Chan, K.D., 1977, Reduction of magnetic and gravity data on an arbitrary surface in a region of high topographic relief. Geophysics, 42, 1411–1430.
  3. Campbell, D.L., 1980, Gravity terrain correction for stations on a uniform slope - a power law approximation. Geophysics, 45, 109–112.
  4. Cogbill, A.H., 1990, Gravity terrain corrections calculated using digital elevation models. Geophysics, 55, 102–106.
  5. Danes, Z.F., 1982, An analytic method for the determination of distant terrain corrections. Geophysics, 47, 1453–1455.
  6. Garland, G.D., 1965, The Earth’s shape and gravity. Pergamon, Oxford. 183pp.
  7. Hammer, S., 1939, Terrain corrections for gravimeter stations. Geophysics, 4, 184–194.
  8. Hammer, S., 1982, Critique of terrain corrections for gravimeter stations. Geophysics, 47, 839–840.
  9. Krohn, D.H., 1976, Gravity terrain corrections using multiquadric equations. Geophysics, 41, 266–275.
  10. Olivier, R.J., & Simard, R.G., 1981, Improvement of the conic prism model for terrain correction in rugged topography. Geophysics, 46, 1054–1056.
  11. Parker, R.L., 1996, Improved Fourier terrain correction, part II. Geophysics, 61, 365–372.
  12. Plouff, D., 1977, Preliminary documentation for a FORTRAN program to compute terrain corrections based on topography digitised on a geographic grid. USGS open file report 77–535.
  13. Sandberg, C.H., 1958, Terrain corrections for an inclined plane in gravity computations. Geophysics, 23, 701–711.
  14. St. John, V.P., & Green, R., 1967, Topographic and isostatic corrections to gravity surveys in mountainous areas. Geophysical Prospecting, 15, 151–162.
  15. Sprenke, K.F., 1989, Efficient terrain corrections - a geostatistical analysis. Geophysics, 54, 1622–1628.
  16. Steinhauser, P., Meurers, B., & Ruess, D., 1990, Gravity investigations under extreme mountainous conditions. Exploration Geophysics, 21, 161–168.
  17. Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P., & Sheriff, R.E., 1990, Applied Geophysics. Second Edition. Cambridge Univ. Press, 770pp.
  18. Xia, J., Sprowl, D.R., & Adkins-Heljeson, D., 1993, Correction of topographic distortions in potential field data - a fast and accurate approach. Geophysics, 58, 515–523.
  19. Zhou, X., Zhong, B., & Li, X., 1990, Gravity terrain corrections by triangular element method. Geophysics, 55, 232–238.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG998467
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): digital terrain models; gravity; survey specification; terrain corrections

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error