1887
Volume 29, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

We often assume that the Earth is flat and that all geophysical surveys are conducted on a flat survey plane, just as many geophysical text books suggest. However the surface of the Earth is often rugged, and the effect of this rugged surface depends directly on the height of the survey above the ground. Mountainous areas have always provided a challenge for both airborne and ground surveys, and for the processing and interpretation of the survey data. For example, airborne surveys in these terrains suffer variable terrain clearance between adjacent survey lines as the aircraft attempts to 'hug' the terrain. This combined with the undulating survey surface, causes data levelling problems and distorted anomalies that often lead to erroneous interpretations of the survey data. Problems associated with airborne surveys conducted in rugged terrains are, in recent times, becoming evident in the low-level surveys now being conducted with agricultural aircraft over seemingly undulating terrains. The close proximity of the survey aircraft to the gently undulating terrain produces the same terrain induced problems as experienced in mountainous terrains.

All ground geophysical methods are strongly affected by rugged terrain. For these surveys, it is often possible to use the rugged terrain to advantage by obtaining multiple 'views' of a buried source by surveying several slopes of the terrain around the target source. In addition, EM loops and galvanic electrodes can also be judiciously located on the terrain to obtain a more accurate definition of a buried anomalous source.

Explorers are also demanding more accurate interpretations of data from rugged terrains in order to resolve target responses from the distorted responses measured in these terrains. To this extent modern 3-dimensional computer modelling software can now accommodate survey data from an undulating survey surface and the geophysical responses of geologically complex undulating terrains can now be computed. Rugged terrains present new challenges to survey design, survey operations, data processing and interpretation, and modelling of the survey data. As a consequence of this there is now an urgent requirement for high resolution digital terrain models for survey design and for accurate reduction, interpretation and modelling of all geophysical survey data. Techniques developed for rugged terrain environments can also be applied to underground and open-pit mine environments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG998531
1998-09-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fox, R.C., Hohmann, G.W., Killpack, T.J. and Rijo, L., 1980, Topographic effects in resistivity and induced-polarisation surveys: Geophysics 45, 75–93.
  2. Grauch, V.J.S., and Campbell, D.L., 1984, Does draping aeromagnetic data reduce terrain-induced effects?: Geophysics 49, 75–80.
  3. Holyland, P.W., 1995, High resolution digital elevation models - a new data source: Exploration Geophysics 26, 302–306.
  4. MacInnes, S. and Zonge, K., 1996, Two-dimensional inversion of resistivity and IP data with topography: Zonge Engineering and Research Organisation, Tucson Arizona.
  5. Mudge, S.T., 1988, The slope correction method of analysing magnetic data from a sloping survey plane: Exploration Geophysics 19, 489–498.
  6. Mudge, S.T., 1995, Helicopter magnetic surveys in rugged terrains - planning, costing, logistics and processing: Preview 55, 14–18.
  7. Mudge, S.T., 1996, The location of TEM transmitter loops underground and in rugged terrain: Exploration Geophysics 27, 175–177.
  8. Olivier, R. and Hinze, W., eds., 1985, Potential Fields in Rugged Topography: Proceedings of International Meeting, July 1985, IGL Bulletin No 7, Institute of Geophysics, University of Lausanne, Switzerland, and the European Geophysical Society.
  9. Schmidt, P., (1998), The calculation of magnetic components and moments from TMI: a case study from the Tuckers Igneous complex, Queensland: Exploration Geophysics 29, this volume.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG998531
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error