1887
Volume 30, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The geoelectrical imaging technique has been widely used for environmental and engineering studies in recent years as this technique gives a graphic representation of the distribution of electrical properties in the subsurface. The evaluation of subsurface objects and detection of buried utilities, such as pipes, is of particular interest for a variety of engineering and environmental applications.

The geoelectrical imaging technique as a non-destructive and inexpensive tool for mapping buried objects was successfully used to locate an underground metal pipe with a diameter of 1.20 m buried at a depth of 0.9 m in the Universiti Sains Malaysia campus. The 2D and 3D geoelectrical imaging surveys using the Wenner, Pole-Pole, Pole-Dipole and Wenner-Schlumberger electrode arrays successfully mapped the shape and location of the underground pipe.

The 2D resistivity sections as well as the 3D vertical slice sections from these surveys demonstrate the effective of the improvements made in field data acquisition that has partially suppressed the effects of a variety of electrical noise sources surrounding the surveyed area. It has reduced the effects of such electrical noise on the field measurements, and has enabled the field results to be more representative of the subsurface target. Moreover it has strengthened the current signal and thus improved the voltage- to - noise ratio for the different electrode arrays used in these surveys.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG999141
1999-09-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdul Nassir, S.S., 1997, A study of the use of different electrode array for electrical imaging surveys: M.Sc. thesis, Universiti. Sains Malaysia (unpublished).
  2. Barker, R.D., 1992, A simple algorithm for electrical imaging of the subsurface: First Break, 10, 53-62.
  3. Coggon, J.H., 1973, A comparison of IP electrode arrays: Geophysics, 38, 737-767.
  4. Edwards, L.S., 1977, A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced- polarization: Geophysics, 42, 1020-1036.
  5. Fröhlich, R.K., 1971, The influence of industrial stray currents on the measurement of the earth potential and their elimination: Geophys. Prosp., 19, 118-132.
  6. Griffiths, D.H. and Barker, R.D., 1993, Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology: J. Appl. Geophys., 29, 211-226.
  7. Griffiths, D.H., Turnbull, J. and Olayinka, A.I., 1990, Two-dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer controlled array: First Break, 8, 121-129.
  8. Hallof, P.G., 1957, On the interpretation of resistivity and induced-polarization measurements: Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (unpublished).
  9. Li Y. and Oldenburg, D.W., 1992, Approximate inverse mappings in DC resistivity problems: Geophysical Journal International, 109, 343-362.
  10. Loke, M.H. and Barker, R.D., 1995, Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections: Geophysics, 60, 1682-1690.
  11. Loke, M.H. and Barker, R.D., 1996a, Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosection by a Quasi-Newton method: Geophys. Prosp., 44, 131152.
  12. Loke, M.H. and Barker, R.D., 1996b, Practical technique for 3D resistivity surveys data inversion: Geophys. Prosp., 44, 499-523.
  13. Nawawi, M.N.M. and Loke, M.H., 1995, Mapping voids and other man-made subsurface structures using 2D resistivity imaging technique: 57th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Euro. Assoc. Expl. Geophys. Extended Abstracts, D033.
  14. West, T.S. and Beacham, A.C., 1944, Precise measurement of deep electrical anomalies: Geophysics, 9, 494-539.
  15. Zeng, X. and McMechan, G.A., 1997, GPR characterization of buried tanks and pipes: Geophysics, 62, 797-806.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG999141
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error