1887
Volume 30, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

A rapid numerical method for evaluating Total Field Magnetometric Resistivity (TFMMR) responses of arbitrary threedimensional structures located between two point current sources has been developed. Finite-difference equations are derived from the Poisson equation which governs electric potential distribution within a given conductivity model. Solution of the resulting matrix equation is made using the Successive Over-Relaxation (SOR) technique combined with matrix pre-conditioning. Computation of current density from the potential and conductivity models is then made. A new, rapid Fourier domain method for evaluating the magnetic field arising from the sub-surface current flow is developed. The new method evaluates the X, Y and Z components of the magnetic field in the full three dimensions of the model space. TFMMR measurements may then be computed as a linear combination of these components. The modelling procedures developed are shown to be extensible to modelling Total Field Magnetometric Induced Polarisation (TFMMIP) responses resulting from electrically polarisable structures.

Comparison of TFMMR computer models generated by analytical and the derived numerical means shows good agreement for a hemispherical sink and two dyke models. An underestimate of the response for a dipping interface model was observed because of the inability of the scheme to accurately model boundary conditions when conductivity inhomogeneities extend to artificial model boundaries.

An analysis of strike length on MMR response is made using conductive, rectangular prism models of varying lengths. This analysis showed a dependence of the MMR response approximately proportional to strike length of the prism. Investigation of the effect of conductive overburden on MMR response showed consequences of the layer were negligible compared to masking that occurs in conventional resistivity methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG999147
1999-09-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boggs, D.B., 1999, The Theory and Application of Sub-Audio Magnetic Data Acquisition and Numerical Modelling: PhD Thesis, University of New England.
  2. Boggs, D.B., Cattach, M.K. and Stanley, J.M., 1998, Feasibility studies of TFMMIP and TFEM surveying with Sub-Audio Magnetics: Expl. Geophys., 29, 290-295.
  3. Cattach, M.K., 1996, Sub-Audio Magnetics (SAM). A High Resolution Geophysical Method for Simultaneously Mapping Electrical and Magnetic Properties of the Earth: PhD Thesis, University of New England.
  4. Cattach, M.K., Stanley, J.M. and Lee, S.J., 1991. “Sub-Audio Magnetics Instrument”. International patent published under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). International publication number: WO 91/19210. World Intellectual Property Organisation.
  5. Cattach, M.K., Stanley, J.M., Lee, S.J. and Boyd, G.W., 1993, Sub-Audio Magnetics (SAM) - A high resolution technique for simultaneously mapping electrical and magnetic properties: Expl. Geophys., 24, 387-400.
  6. Champeney, D.C., 1973, Fourier transforms and their physical applications. Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd.
  7. Dey, A. and Morrison, H.F., 1979, Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped threedimensional structures: Geophysics, 36, 753-780.
  8. Edwards, R.N., 1974, The magnetometric resistivity method and its application to the mapping of a fault: Can. J. Earth Sci., 11, 1136-1156.
  9. Edwards, R.N. and Howell, E.C., 1976, Field test of the magnetometric resistivity (MMR) method: Geophysics, 41, 1170-1183.
  10. Edwards, R.N., Lee, H. and Nabighian, M.N., 1978, On the theory of magnetometric resistivity (MMR) methods: Geophysics, 43, 1176-1203.
  11. Edwards, R.N. and Nabighian, M.N., 1991. The magnetometric resistivity method. in: Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics. Investigations in Geophysics 3, Vol.2. Soc. Expl. Geophys., 47-104.
  12. Erdelyi A., 1954, Tables of Integral Transforms, Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
  13. Fathianpour, N., 1997, Analytical and Numerical Modelling of Total Field Magnetometric Resistivity (TFMMR) Data: Ph.D Thesis, Flinders University of South Australia.
  14. Fathianpour, N. and Cattach, M.K., 1995, Analytical solutions for the total field magnetometric resistivity (TFMMR) technique: Expl. Geophys. 26, 158-166.
  15. Hishida, H., Tsujimoto, T., Humphreys, G., Linford, G., 1993, MIP test survey over the HYC deposit in McArthur River area, N.T: Expl. Geophys., 24, 577-584.
  16. Howland-Rose, A.W., Linford, J.G., Pitcher, D.H. and Siegel, H.O.,1980, Some recent magnetic induced polarization developments: Geophysics 45, Parts I and II, 37-74.
  17. Jakowsky, J.J., 1940, Exploration Geophysics. Los Angeles Times-Mirror Press.
  18. Pai, D. and Edwards, R.N., 1983, Programme MMR2DFD: finite difference modelling of MMR anomalies: Res. in Applied Geophys., 25, University of Toronto.
  19. Seigel, H.O., 1974, The magnetic induced polarization method: Geophysics 39, 321339.
  20. Siegel, H.O. and Howland-Rose, A.W., 1990, Magnetic induced-polarization method. in: Induced polarization applications and case histories: Investigations in Geophysics 4, Soc. Expl. Geophys., 23-56.
  21. Skeels, D.C. and Watson, R.J., 1949, Derivation of magnetic and gravitational quantities by surface integration: Geophysics, 14, 133-150.
  22. Szarka, L., 1987, Geophysical mapping by stationary electric and magnetic field components: a combination of potential gradient mapping and magnetometric resistivity (MMR) methods: Geophys. Prosp., 35, 424-444.
  23. Weller, A., Seichter, M. and Kampke, A., 1996, Induced-polarization modelling using complex electrical conductivities: Geophys. J. Int., 127, 387-398.
  24. Yang, C-H. and Tseng, H-W., 1992, Topographic responses in magnetometric resitivity modeling: Geophysics, 57, 1409-1418.
  25. Zhao, S. and Yeldin, M.J., 1996, Some refinements on the finite-difference method for 3-D dc resistivity modeling: Geophysics, 61, 1301-1307.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG999147
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error