oa Reassessment of the Grades of the Adelaide Model Logging Pits

References

1. Bristow, Q., Killeen, P. G., and Mwenifumbo, J. C. (1982). Comparison of standardized gamma-ray log calibration measurements: Ottawa, Adelaide and Grand Junction. In Uranium Exploration Methods, Proc Symposium Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 715–726.
2. Dickson, B. L. (1983). Grade assignment of gamma-logging model test-pits: Restricted Investigation Report 1395, CSIRO Division of Mineral Physics.
3. Dodd, P. H., and Eschliman, D. H. (1971). Borehole logging techniques for uranium exploration and evaluation. In Uranium Prospecting Handbook, S. H. U. Bowie and others, eds., Proc. NATO-Sponsored Advanced Study Institute London, Inst. Mining and Metallurgy Trans., pp. 244–276.
4. George, D. C. (1982a). Comparison of gamma-ray logs for United States and Australian calibration models: Bendix Field Engineering Corporation Report BFEC-1982-2.
5. George, D. C. (1982b). Total count gamma-ray logging: correction factors and logging model grade assignments. In Uranium Exploration Methods, Proc Symposium Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 729–751.
6. George, D. C., Heistand, B. E., and Krabacher, J. E. (1983). Grade assignments for models used for calibration of gross-count gamma-ray logging systems. Bendix Field Engineering Corporation Report GJBX-39(83).
7. Leino, R., George, D. C., Key, B. N., Knight, L., and Steele, W. D. (1994). Field calibration facilities for environmental measurement of radium, thorium, and potassium. DOE/ ID/12584-179; GJ/TMC-01 (Third Edition). RUST Geotech, Inc., Grand Junction, CO, 1994.
8. Wenk, G. J., and Dickson, B. L. (1981). The gamma-logging calibration facility at the Australian Mineral Development Laboratories. ASEG Bulletin12, 37–39.