Estimating the direction of source magnetisation through comparison of pseudogravity and total gradient

References

1. Baranov, V. 1957 A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: pseudo-gravimetric anomalies. Geophysics22: 359–83. doi: 10.1190/1.1438369
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438369 [Google Scholar]
2. Beiki, M., D. A. Clark, J. Austin, and C. Foss 2012 Estimating source location using normalized magnetic source strength calculated from magnetic gradient tensor data. Geophysics77 no. 6: J23–J37. doi: 10.1190/geo2011‑0437.1
   https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0437.1 [Google Scholar]
3. Blakely, J. R. 1995 Potential theory in gravity & magnetic applications. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bott, M. H. P., R. A. Smith, and R. A. Stacey 1966 Estimation of the direction of magnetization of a body causing a magnetic anomaly using a pseudo-gravity transformation. Geophysics31: 803–811. doi:10.1190/1.1439812.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Butler, R. F. 2004 Paleomagnetism: Magnetic domains to geologic terranes, (Electronic edition). Portland, Oregon: University of Portland.
6. Clark, D. A. 2012 New methods for interpretation of magnetic vector and gradient tensor data I: eigenvector analysis and the normalised source strength. Exploration Geophysics43: 267–282. doi:10.1071/EG12020.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clark, D. A. 2013 New approaches to dealing with remanence: magnetic moment analysis using tensor invariants and remote determination of in situ magnetisation using a static tensor gradiometer, ASEG-PESA Conference, Melbourne. Extended Abstract, 1–7.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Clark, D. A. 2014 Methods for determining remanent and total magnetisationsof magnetic sources – a review. Exploration Geophysics45: 271–304. doi: 10.1071/EG14013
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14013 [Google Scholar]
9. Dannemiller, N., and Y. Li 2006 A new method for determination of magnetization direction. Geophysics71: L69–L73. doi:10.1190/1.2356116.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fedi, M., G. Florio, and A. Rapolla 1994 A method to estimate the total magnetization direction from a distortion analysis of magnetic anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting42: 261–274. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00209.x.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Garland, G. D. 1951 Combined analysis of gravity and magnetic anomalies. Geophysics16: 51–62. doi: 10.1190/1.1437650
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437650 [Google Scholar]
12. Gerovska, D., M. J. Araúzo-Bravo, and P. Stavrev 2009 Estimating the magnetization direction of sources from southeast Bulgaria through correlation between reduced-to-the- pole and total magnitude Anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting57: 491–505. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00761.x.
    [Google Scholar]
13. McKenzie, B., C. Foss, and D. Hillan 2012 An improved search for magnetization direction, 22nd ASEG Geophysical Conference, Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
14. Nabighian, M. N. 1972 The analytic signalof two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics37: 507–517. doi: 10.1190/1.1440276
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440276 [Google Scholar]
15. Nabighian, M. N. 1974 Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross section. Geophysics39: 85–92. doi: 10.1190/1.1440416
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440416 [Google Scholar]
16. Roest, W. R., J. Verhoef, and M. Pilkington 1992 Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics57 no. 6: 116–125. doi: 10.1190/1.1443174
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443174 [Google Scholar]
17. Roest, W. R., and M. Pilkington 1993 Identifying remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data. Geophysics58: 653–659. doi:10.1190/1.1443449.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Salem, A., and D. Ravat 2003 A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data. Geophysics68 no. 6: 1952–1961. doi: 10.1190/1.1635049
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1635049 [Google Scholar]
19. Schnetzler, C. C., and P. T. Taylor 1984 Evaluation of an observational method for estimation of remanent magnetization. Geophysics49: 282–290. doi:10.1190/1.1441660.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Stavrev, P., and D. Gerovska 2000 Magnetic field transforms with low sensitivity to the direction of source magnetization and high centricity. Geophysical Prospecting48: 317–340. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00188.x.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Zhang, H., D. Ravat, Y. R. Marangoni, G. Chen, and X. Hu 2018 Improved total magnetization direction determination by correlation of the normalized source strength derivative and the reduced-to-pole fields. Geophysics83 no. 6: J75–J85. doi:10.1190/geo2017-0178.1.
    [Google Scholar]