Iterated extended Kalman filter for airborne electromagnetic data inversion

References

1. Chang-Chun, Y., R. Xiu-Yan, L. Yun-He, Q. Yan-Fu, Q. Chang-Kai, and C. Jing 2015 Review on airborne electromagnetic inverse theory and applications. Geophysics80, no. 4: W17–31. doi: 10.1190/geo2014‑0544.1
   https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0544.1 [Google Scholar]
2. Fraser, D.C. 1987 Layered-earth resistivity mapping. In Developments and applications of modern airborne electromagnetic surveys, ed. D.V. Fitterman, 33–41. Golden, Colo., USA: US Geological Survey Bulletin.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Golovan, A.A., and N.A. Parusnikov 1998 A relationship between the stochastic estimability measure and singular matrix expansions. Automation and Remote Control59, no. 2: 190–93.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Guillemoteau, J., P. Sailhac, and M. Béhaegel 2011 Regularization strategy for the layered inversion of airborne transient electromagnetic data: Application to in-loop data acquired over the basin of Franceville (Gabon). Geophysical Prospecting59: 1132–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2011.00990.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00990.x [Google Scholar]
5. Hadamard, J. 1932 Le problème de Cauchy et les équations aux dérivées partielles linéaires hyperboliques. Paris, France: Hermann.
6. Havlik, J., and O. Straka 2015 Performance evaluation of iterated extended Kalman filter with variable step-length. Journal of Physics: Conference Series659: 12–22.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jupp, D.L.B., and K. Vozoff 1975 Stable iterative methods for the inversion of geophysical data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society42: 957–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.1975.tb06461.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb06461.x [Google Scholar]
8. Kalman, R. 1960 A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. ASME Journal of Basic Engineering82: 35–45. doi: 10.1115/1.3662552
   https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552 [Google Scholar]
9. Karshakov, E., and J. Moilanen 2018 Combined interpretation both time domain and frequency domain data. Papers of the 7th International Workshop on Airborne Electromagnetics AEM-2018, 1–3. Kolding, Denmark.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Karshakov, E.V., and M.V. Kharichkin 2008 A stochastic estimation problem at aeromagnetometer deviation compensation. Automation and Remote Control69, no. 7: 1162–70. doi: 10.1134/S0005117908070072
    https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117908070072 [Google Scholar]
11. Keppenne, C.L., and M. Rienecker 2003 Assimilation of temperature into an isopycnal ocean general circulation model using a parallel Ensemble Kalman filter. Journal of Marine Systems40–41: 363–80. doi: 10.1016/S0924‑7963(03)00025‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(03)00025-3 [Google Scholar]
12. Legault, J.M. 2015 Airborne electromagnetic systems – State of the art and future directions. CSEG Recorder40 no. 6: 38–49.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Palacky, G.J. 1987 Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets. In Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics - Theory, ed. N. M. Nabighian, 53–129. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: Society of Exploration Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Simon, D. 2006 Optimal state estimation. Kalman, H∞ and nonlinear approaches. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15. Volkovitsky, A., and E. Karshakov 2013 Airborne EM systems variety: what is the difference? Mpumalanga, South Africa. Papers of the 13th SAGA Biennial @ 6th International AEM Conference AEM-2013, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Vovenko, T., E. Moilanen, A. Volkovitsky and E. Karshakov 2013 New abilities of quadrature EM systems: Mpumalanga, South Africa. Papers of the 13th SAGA Biennial @ 6th International AEM Conference AEM-2013, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Zhdanov, M.S. 2009 Geophysical electromagnetic theory and methods. Amsterdam, Netherlands and Oxford, UK: Elsevier.