1887
Volume 50, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth geophysical interpretation of the geology of the Stanthorpe region with a particular focus on hydrothermal alteration. The radiometric ternary map outlines the main lithological divisions in the region, which together with Th and Th/K ratio maps distinguish various granitic suites. Magnetic signatures delineate a non-magnetic zone within the low to moderately magnetic Stanthorpe Granite. The non-magnetic section, a north–northwest trending belt with a high density of faults and dykes is interpreted as a hydrothermal alteration zone that is narrower in the north, widens southwards, and is much more extensive at depth than is suggested by the surface alteration pattern. Modelling of gravity data reveals a massive low-density granitic intrusion extending to a depth of 10–15 km. The low-gravity section with modelled rock densities between 2450 and 2670 kg/m3 coincides with the low magnetic susceptibility zone in the magnetic model. High K, low Th and low Th/K also characterise the sections of the Stanthorpe Granite that have both low gravity and magnetic responses. Also conspicuous in the geophysical signatures within the non-magnetic zone is an ovoid feature of low magnetic response, high uranium content with moderate density, interpreted as a granitic pluton. Thus, decrease in magnetisation, changes in K concentration and corresponding low gravity with an associated high density of faults, fractures and dykes in the Stanthorpe region are the main features of the quartz–sericite–chlorite–muscovite hydrothermal alteration.

© 2019 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysics
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1659102
2019-11-02
2026-01-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1659102
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Airo, L. 2002 Aeromagnetic and aeroradiometric response to hydrothermal alteration. Surveys in Geophysics23: 273–302. doi: 10.1023/A:1015556614694
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015556614694 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allis, R.G. 1990 Geophysical anomalies over epithermal systems. Journal of Geochemical Exploration36: 339–74. doi: 10.1016/0375‑6742(90)90060‑N
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(90)90060-N [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger, B.R., R.A. Ayuso, J. Wynn, and R.R. Seal 2008 Preliminary model of porphyry copper deposits. US Geological Survey, Open-file Report, 2008–1321.
  4. Brown, R.E. 2010 Potential exploration uses of high resolution geophysical data in the southern New England Orogen. In New England orogen conference, ed. S. Buckman and P.C Blevin, 55–61. Armidale: University of New England.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, R.E., H.F. Henley, and W.J. Stroud 2001 Geology, mineral occurrences, exploration and geochemistry of Warwick-tweed heads 1:250 000 sheet area. Exploration Data Package1: GS2001/087.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryant, C.J., B.W. Chappell, and P.L. Blevin 2014 Granites of the Southern New England Orogen. In The Ishihara Symposium: Granites and Associated Metallogenesis, 9–11.
  7. Clark, D.A. 2014 Magnetic effects of hydrothermal alteration in porphyry copper and iron-oxide copper-gold systems: A review. Tectonophysics624–625: 46–65. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.12.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark, D.A., and D.W. Emerson 1991 Notes on rock magnetization characteristics in applied geophysical studies. Exploration Geophysics22: 547–55. doi: 10.1071/EG991547
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG991547 [Google Scholar]
  9. Criss, R., and D. Champion 1984 Magnetic properties of granitic rocks from the southern half of the Idaho Batholith: Influences of hydrothermal alteration and implications for aeromagnetic interpretation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth89: 7061–76. doi: 10.1029/JB089iB08p07061
     https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB08p07061 [Google Scholar]
  10. Denaro, T.J. 1992 Mineralisation in the Stanthorpe-Texas area. In Field Conference Geological Society of Australia, 8–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dentith, M., and S.T. Mudge 2014 Geophysics for the mineral exploration geoscientist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Dickson, B.L., and K.M. Scott 1997 Interpretation of aerial gamma-ray surveys – Adding the geochemical factors. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics17: 187–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Donchak, P.J.T., R.J. Bultitude, D.J. Purdy, and T.J. Denaro 2007 Geology and mineralisation of the Texas region, south-eastern Queensland. Queensland11: 1–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Flood, C.L., and J.C. Aitchison eds 1993 New England orogen, Eastern Australia, Armidale: University of New England.
  15. Ford, K., P. Keating, and M.D. Thomas 2007 Overview of geophysical signatures associated with Canadian ore deposits. Geological Association of Canada, Special pu5: 939–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Galbraith, J.H., and D.F. Saunders 1983 Rock classification by characteristics of aerial gamma-ray measurements. Journal of Geochemical Exploration18: 49–73. doi: 10.1016/0375‑6742(83)90080‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(83)90080-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. Geophysical Archive Data Delivery System (GADDS). http://www.geoscience.gov.au/gadds.
  18. Grant, F.S. 1985 Aeromagnetics, geology and ore environments, II. Magnetite and ore environments. Geoexploration23: 335–62. doi: 10.1016/0016‑7142(85)90002‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7142(85)90002-X [Google Scholar]
  19. Gunn, P.J., D. Maidment, and P.R. Milligan 1997 Interpreting aeromagnetic data in areas of limited outcrop. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics17: 175–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Henkel, H., and M. Guzmán 1977 Magnetic features of fracture zones. Geoexploration15: 173–81. doi: 10.1016/0016‑7142(77)90024‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7142(77)90024-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hinze, W.J., R.R.B. von Frese, and A.H Saad 2013 Gravity and magnetic exploration: Principles, practices, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Holcombe, R.J., C.J. Stephens, C.R. Fielding, D. Gust, T.A. Little, R. Sliwa, J. McPhie, and A. Ewart 1997 Tectonic evolution of the Northern New England fold belt: Carboniferous to early Permian transition from active accretion to extension.
  23. Irvine, R.J., and M.J. Smith 1990 Geophysical exploration for epithermal gold deposits. Journal of Geochemical Exploration36: 375–412. doi: 10.1016/0375‑6742(90)90061‑E
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(90)90061-E [Google Scholar]
  24. Jaques, A.L., P. Wellman, A. Whitaker, and D. Wyborn 1997 High-resolution geophysics in modern geological mapping. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics17: 159–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kamineni, D.C., and J.J.B. Dugal 1981 Technical record TR-178 a preliminary report and interpretation of alteration in the eye-dashta lakes pluton D.C.: Technical Record TR-178.
  26. Korsch, R.J., and H.J. Harrington 1981 Stratigraphic and structural synthesis of the new stratigraphic and structural synthesis. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia28: 205–26. doi: 10.1080/00167618108729157
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00167618108729157 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lapointe, P., B.A. Chomyn, W.A. Morris, and R.L. Coles 1984 Significance of magnetic susceptibility measurements from the Lac du bonnet batholith, Manitoba, Canada. Geoexploration22: 217–29. doi: 10.1016/0016‑7142(84)90013‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7142(84)90013-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Locke, C.A., and C.E.J. De Ronde 1987 Delineation of gold-bearing hydrothermally altered rocks using gravity data—A New Zealand example. Geoexploration24: 471–81. doi: 10.1016/0016‑7142(87)90016‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7142(87)90016-0 [Google Scholar]
  29. Maden, N., and E. Akaryali 2015 Gamma ray spectrometry for recognition of hydrothermal alteration zones related to a low sulfidation epithermal gold mineralization (eastern Pontides, NE türkiye). Journal of Applied Geophysics122: 74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mustard, R. 2001 Granite-hosted gold mineralization at Timbarra, northern New South Wales, Australia. Mineralium Deposita36: 542–62. doi: 10.1007/s001260100188
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s001260100188 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mustard, R., T. Ulrich, V.S. Kamenetsky, and T. Mernagh 2006 Gold and metal enrichment in natural granitic melts during fractional crystallization. Geological Society of America34: 85–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Olgers, F. 1974 1:250 000 geological series – Explanatory notes, Warwick, Queensland and New South Wales sheet SH/56-2. Australian Government Publishing Service, 1–43.
  33. Olgers, F., and P.G. Flood 1969 Progress report on the geology of the Texas high, Queensland and New South Wales (BMR Record 1969/29).
  34. Shanks, W.C.P. III 2012 Hydrothermal alteration in volcanogenic massive sulfide occurrence model. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5070-C, 169–178.
  35. Sharma, P.V. 1986 Geophysical methods in geology second. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  36. Shives, R.B.K., B.W. Charbonneau, and K.L. Ford 2000 The detection of potassic alteration by gamma-ray spectrometry—Recognition of alteration related to mineralization. Geophysics65: 2001–11. doi: 10.1190/1.1444884
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444884 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sivell, W.J., and M. Passmore 1999 Stanthorpe Granite Group – I: Petrologic diversity and the results of recent 1:10000 mapping. In Regional geology tectonics and metallogenesis, New England Orogen ‘99 Conference, ed. P.G. Flood, 301–314. University of New England.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Stonestreet, P.G., P.M. Ashley, R.E. Brown, and W.J. Sivell 2006 The fox tor diorite, a newly recognised intrusion within the New England Batholith, northern New South Wales. Geological Survey of New South Wales, Quarterly Notes No. 122.
  39. Telford, W.M., L.P. Geldart, and R.E. Sheriff 1990 Applied geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Tulyatid, J. 1992 Airborne radiometric data interpretation as an aid to granitic terrain mapping: A case study for Hua Hin -Pran Buri area, south central Thailand. National Conference on “Geologic Resources of Thailand: Potential for Future Development”, Department of Mineral Resources.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wake, B.A., and R.M. Meares 2003 EL 5714 rivertree project third annual exploration report for the year ended 17 April 2003.
  42. Whitaker, W.G., and P.M. Green 1980 Moreton geology. Geological Survey of Queensland.
  43. Wilford, J., L. Worrall, and B. Minty 2009 Radiometric map of Australia provides new insights into uranium prospectivity, 1–4.
  44. Willmott, W. 2016 Rocks and landscapes of Stanthorpe & Granite Belt. Geological Survey of Australia, Qld Division.
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1659102
Loading
Geophysical interpretation of the geology of the Stanthorpe region using aeromagnetic, gravity and radiometric data
Exploration Geophysics 50, 653 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2019.1659102
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1659102
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1659102
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Density; faults; gravity; magnetics; radiometrics; susceptibility

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error