1887
Volume 51, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We describe a new approach for modelling airborne transient electromagnetic (TEM) data which combines the use of on- and off-time data for inversion. Specifically, the response is modelled using system response convolution both during and after transmitter ramp-down. High near-surface sensitivity can be achieved through a combination of fast transmitter ramp-down, broad receiver system bandwidth, efficient suppression or explanation of the primary field, and by combining the use of on-time gates with accurate knowledge of the system response. The system response can either be calculated based on the transfer function of the individual system components (i.e. receiver coil, amplifiers, low-pass filters and current waveform) or it can be measured at high altitude. The latter approach has the advantage of avoiding the specific modelling of individual system components. By comparing model parameter uncertainty when the on-time gates are included in the inversion versus when they are not, we show that a significant improvement in near-surface sensitivity is obtained. The method is used to invert both synthetic and field data. In the inversion of synthetic data, we see clear improvements in the determination of thin shallow layers, especially when they are resistive. This is confirmed by inversion of field data where we observe more pronounced structures with better definition of layer boundaries and layer resistivities.

© 2019 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1662292
2020-01-02
2026-01-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1662292
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, K.R., N.S. Nyboe, C. Kirkegaard, E. Auken, and A.V. Christiansen 2015 A system response convolution routine for improved near surface sensitivity in SkyTEM Data. EAGE First European Airborne Electromagnetics Conference, Tu AEM 07.
  2. Auken, E., T. Boesen, and A.V. Christiansen 2017 A review of airborne electromagnetic methods with focus on geotechnical and hydrological applications from 2007 to 2017. Advances in Geophysics58: 47–93. doi: 10.1016/bs.agph.2017.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agph.2017.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Auken, E., and A.V. Christiansen 2004 Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data. Geophysics69: 752–61. doi: 10.1190/1.1759461
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1759461 [Google Scholar]
  4. Auken, E., A.V. Christiansen, G. Fiandaca, C. Schamper, A.A. Behroozmand, A. Binley, E. Nielsen, et al. 2015 An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data. Exploration Geophysics46: 223–35. doi: 10.1071/EG13097
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG13097 [Google Scholar]
  5. Balch, S.J., W.P. Boyko, and N.R. Paterson 2003 The AeroTEM airborne electromagnetic system. The Leading Edge22: 562–66. doi: 10.1190/1.1587679
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1587679 [Google Scholar]
  6. Balch, S.J., W.P. Boyko, and N.R. Paterson 2007 The AeroTEM airborne electromagnetic system. The Leading Edge, 562–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Effersø, F. 2014 SkyTEM: a versatile HELITEM system: Presented at the Annual Meeting of Association of Exploration Geophysicists. AEG.
  8. Everett, M.E. 2012 Theoretical developments in electromagnetic induction geophysics with selected applications in the near surface. Surveys in Geophysics33: 29–63. doi: 10.1007/s10712‑011‑9138‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-011-9138-y [Google Scholar]
  9. Foged, N., E. Auken, A.V. Christiansen, and K.I. Sørensen 2013 Test site calibration and validation of airborne and ground based TEM systems. Geophysics78: E95–E106. doi: 10.1190/geo2012‑0244.1
     https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0244.1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Forsythe, G.E., M.A. Malcolm, and C.B. Moler 1977 Interpolation (chapter 4), Numerical integration (chapter 5). In Computer methods for mathematical computations, Prentice-Hall series in automatic computation, 63–105. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. HydroGeophysics Group, Aarhus University, Denmark 2017 SkyTEM Reynolds Creek. Repport 09-02-2017.
  12. Johansen, H.K., and K.I. Sørensen 1979 Fast Hankel transforms. Geophysical Prospecting27: 876–901. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1979.tb01005.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb01005.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirkegaard, C., K. Andersen, T. Boesen, V. Christiansen, E. Auken, and G. Fiandaca 2012 Utilizing massively parallel co-processors in the AarhusInv 1D forward and inverse AEM modelling code. ASEG-PESA.
  14. Kirkegaard, C., and E. Auken 2015 A parallel, scalable and memory efficient inversion code for very large-scale airborne electromagnetics surveys. Geophysical Prospecting63: 495–507. doi: 10.1111/1365‑2478.12200
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12200 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirkegaard, C., N. Foged, E. Auken, A.V. Christiansen, and K.I. Sørensen 2012 On the value of including x-component data in 1D modeling of electromagnetic data from helicopterborne time domain systems in horizontally layered environments. Journal of Applied Geophysics84: 61–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.06.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  16. Knight, J.H., and A.P. Raiche 1982 Transient electromagnetic calculations using the Gaver-Stehfest inverse Laplace transform method. Geophysics47: 47–50. doi: 10.1190/1.1441280
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441280 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lane, R., A.G. Green, C. Golding, M. Owers, P. Pik, C. Plunkett, D. Sattel, and B. Thorn 2000 An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics31: 162–72. doi: 10.1071/EG00162
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG00162 [Google Scholar]
  18. Legault, J., A. Prikhodko, D.J. Dodds, J.C. Macnae, and G.A. Oldenborger 2012 Results of recent VTEM helicopter system development testing over the Spiritwood Valley Aquifer, Manitoba. SAGEEP, Society of Exploration Geophysicists1: 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Macnae, J., and B. Milkereit 2007 Developments in broadband airborne electromagnetics in the past decade. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mineral Exploration.
  20. Nyboe, N.S., and S.S. Mai 2017 Recent advances in Skytem receiver system technologies. EAGE 2nd European Airborne Electromagnetics Conference.
  21. Raiche, A. 1998 Modelling the time-domain response of AEM systems. Exploration Geophysics29: 103–6. doi: 10.1071/EG998103
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG998103 [Google Scholar]
  22. Schamper, C., E. Auken, and K.I. Sørensen 2014 Coil response inversion for very early time modelling of helicopter-borne time-domain electromagnetic data and mapping of near-surface geological layers. Geophysical Prospecting62: 658–74. doi:10.1111/365-2478.12104. doi: 10.1111/1365‑2478.12104
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12104 [Google Scholar]
  23. Seyfried, M., K. Lohse, D. Marks, G. Flerchinger, F. Pierson, and W. Steven Holbrook 2018 Reynolds creek experimental watershed and critical zone observatory. Vadose Zone Journal17. doi: 10.2136/vzj2018.07.0129
     https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.07.0129 [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith, R.S. 2001 On removing the primary field from fixed-wing time-domain airborne electromagnetic data: some consequences for quantitative modelling, estimating bird position and detecting perfect conductors. Geophysical Prospecting49: 405–16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365‑2478.2001.00266.x
     https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00266.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Sørensen, K.I., and E. Auken 2004 SkyTEM - a new high-resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics35: 194–9. doi: 10.1071/EG04194
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG04194 [Google Scholar]
  26. Spies, B.R. 1989 Depth of investigation in electromagnetic sounding methods. Geophysics54: 872–88. doi: 10.1190/1.1442716
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442716 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tarantola, A., and B. Valette 1982 Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion. Reviews of Geophysics20: 219–32. doi: 10.1029/RG020i002p00219
     https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i002p00219 [Google Scholar]
  28. Witherly, K.E., R.J. Irvine, and E. Morrison 2004 The Geotech VTEM time domain helicopter EM system. ASEG Extended Abstracts2004: 1–4. doi: 10.1071/ASEG2004ab162
     https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2004ab162 [Google Scholar]
  29. Yin, C., R. Smith, G. Hodges, and P. Annan 2008 Modeling results of on-and off-time B and dB/dt for time-domain airborne EM systems. 70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2008.
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1662292
Loading
On-time modelling using system response convolution for improved shallow resolution of the subsurface in airborne TEM
Exploration Geophysics 51, 4 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2019.1662292
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1662292
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1662292
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): airborne electromagnetics; airborne geophysics; Airborne survey; time-domain

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error