1887
Volume 51, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In a majority of geotechnical projects and in geohazard studies, knowledge of sediment thickness is crucial, along with information about sediment types such as possible occurrence of sensitive clay. We test the recently improved (SR) method on data from an airborne electromagnetic (AEM) survey carried out in Norway to support ground investigations for linear infrastructure projects. In geotechnical projects, especially the upper metres are important to resolve. The acquisition systems, calibration and data processing and inversion are continuously improved to increase the sensitivity of the AEM systems. SR is applied in the inversion of time-domain AEM data making it possible to utilise the very earliest time gates, which provide information about the shallower layers, aiming to increase the near-surface resolution of the models. We test this new method on data from a site where comparably small resistivity contrasts (5–10 Ωm embedded in 10–50 Ωm) are crucial to resolve, to successfully identify hazardous quick clay. The AEM field data inverted with the full SR provide models with more pronounced structures in the near surface, better reflecting true structures observed in resistivity borehole measurements. We see the same outcome when conducting synthetic modelling. In the synthetic models where these early gates were included, thinner layers with smaller resistivity contrasts are resolved. This is a promising result considering to further use AEM in projects where high resolution in the near surface is essential.

© 2019 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1691441
2020-01-02
2026-01-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1691441
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amine, D., and G. Hodges 2010 Airborne electromagnetic systems and their engineering and environmental applications. 23rd EEGS symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems, extended abstracts, 138–44.
  2. Andersen, K.K., N.S. Nyboe, C. Kirkegaard, E. Auken, and A.V. Christiansen 2015 A system response convolution routine for improved near surface sensitivity in SkyTEM data. First European airborne electromagnetic conference, EAGE, extended abstracts, Tu AEM 07.
  3. Anschütz, H., C. Christensen, and A. Pfaffhuber 2014 Quantitative depth to bedrock extraction from AEM data. Near surface geoscience, expanded abstract, Tu Olym 01.
  4. Anschütz, H., S. Bazin, and A.A. Pfaffhuber 2015 Towards using AEM for sensitive clay mapping – a case study from Norway. First European airborne electromagnetics conference, EAGE, extended abstracts, Mo AEM 04.
  5. Anschütz, H., S. Bazin, K. Kåsin, A.A. Pfaffhuber, and T.F. Smaavik 2017 Airborne mapping of sensitive clay – stretching the limits of AEM resolution and accuracy. Near Surface Geophysics15: 467–74. doi: 10.3997/1873‑0604.2017018
     https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2017018 [Google Scholar]
  6. Auken, E., A.V. Christiansen, B.H. Jacobsen, N. Foged, and K.I. Sørensen 2005 Piecewise 1D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data. Geophysical Prospecting53: 497–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2005.00486.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00486.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Auken, E., A. Viezzoli, and A. Christensen 2009 A single software for processing, inversion, and presentation of AEM data of different systems. The Aarhus workbench: ASEG 20th geophysical conference, extended abstracts, Vol. 2009, no. 1, 1–5.
  8. Auken, E., A.V. Christiansen, C. Kirkegaard, G. Fiandaca, C. Schamper, A.A. Behroozmand, A. Binley, et al. 2014 An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data. Exploration Geophysics46, no. 3: 223–35. doi: 10.1071/EG13097
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG13097 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baranwal, V.C., J.S. Rønning, I.L. Solberg, and J.F. Tønnesen 2015 Delineation of marine sediments in a landslide area in Norway using frequency domain helicopter-borne em and ground geophysical surveys. Symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems 2015, extended abstracts, 90–94.
  10. Bastani, M., L. Persson, H. Löfroth, C.A. Smith, and D. Schälin 2017 Analysis of ground geophysical, airborne TEM, and geotechnical data for mapping quick clays in Sweden. In Landslides in sensitive clays. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research 46, ed. V. Thakur, J-S L’Heureux, and A. Locat, 463–74. Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Long, M., A.A. Pfaffhuber, S. Bazin, K. Kåsin, A. Gylland, and A. Montaflia 2018 Glacio-marine clay resistivity as a proxy for remoulded shear strength: Correlations and limitations. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology51: 63–78. doi: 10.1144/qjegh2016‑136
     https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2016-136 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lysdahl, A., A.A. Pfaffhuber, H. Anschütz, K. Kåsin, and S. Bazin 2017 Helicopter electromagnetic scanning as a first step in regional quick clay mapping. In Landslides in sensitive clays. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research 46, ed. V. Thakur, J-S L’Heureux, and A. Locat, 443–52. Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Minsley, B.J., J.D. Abraham, B.D. Smith, J.C. Cannia, C.I. Voss, M.T. Jorgenson, M.A. Walvoord, et al. 2012 Airborne electromagnetic imaging of discontinuous permafrost. Geophysical Research Letters39, no. 2. doi:10.1029/2011GL050079.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. NGF 2011 Guidance for geotechnical symbols and definitions – identification and classification of soil – report number 2, revised 2011 (in Norwegian). Norwegian Geotechnical Society.
  15. Pfaffhuber, A.A., H. Anschütz, T. Ørbech, S. Bazin, A.O. Lysdahl, M. Vöge, G. Sauvin, et al. 2016 Regional geotechnical railway corridor mapping using airborne electromagnetics. 5th international conference on geotechnical and geophysical site characterisation, extended abstracts, 923–8.
  16. Pfaffhuber, A.A., S. Bazin, K. Kåsin, H. Anschütz, R. Sandven, A. Montafia, A.S. Gylland, and M. Long 2016 In-situ detection of sensitive clays from a geophysical perspective. Proceedings, ICS (Vol. 5).
  17. Rømoen, M., A.A. Pfaffhuber, K. Karlsrud, and T.E. Helle 2010 Resistivity on marine sediments retrieved from RCPTU-soundings: A Norwegian case study. 2nd international symposium on cone penetration testing (CPT’10), Vol. 2, 289–96.
  18. Sandven, R., A. Vik, S. Rønning, E. Tørum, S. Christensen, and A. Gylland 2012 Detektering av kvikkleire fra ulike sonderingsmetoder. Oslo: Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat i et samarbeid med Statens vegvesen og Jernbaneverket, Rapport nr. 46/2012.
  19. Siemon, B., A.V. Christiansen, and E. Auken 2009 A review of helicopter-borne electromagnetic methods for ground water exploration. Near Surface Geophysics7: 629–46. doi: 10.3997/1873‑0604.2009043
     https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2009043 [Google Scholar]
  20. Sørensen, K.I., and E. Auken 2004 SkyTEM – a new high-resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics35: 194–202. doi: 10.1071/EG04194
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG04194 [Google Scholar]
  21. Steuer, A., B. Siemon, and E. Auken 2009 A comparison of helicopter-borne electromagnetics in frequency- and time-domain at the Cuxhaven valley in Northern Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics67: 194–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.07.001 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1691441
Loading
Improved near-surface resolution in geotechnical applications using very early AEM time gates
Exploration Geophysics 51, 184 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2019.1691441
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1691441
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1691441
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Airborne electromagnetics; airborne geophysics; inversion; modelling; near surface; time-domain

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error