1887
Volume 51, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Reservoir characterisation using a crossplot of elastic properties can be used to determine fluid and lithology in a seismic survey area. P-impedance and P-wave/S-wave ratios are commonly used as axis parameter for a 2D crossplot. To achieve this goal, the fluid and lithology must first be identified using well log data. However, when the well log data are too sparse, they cannot encompass the full suite of reservoir properties. Stochastic forward modelling (SFM) methods have been developed to overcome the sparseness problem. However, when the results of SFM are plotted on the 2D crossplot, the augmented data for different facies frequently overlap. To overcome this problem, we propose a probabilistic reservoir characterisation using 3D crossplotting of the SFM results. Axis-parameters of the 3D crossplot consist of the seismic attributes by which the facies are distinguished. The acoustic impedance (), pseudo gamma ray (GR) log, and pseudo water saturation () log were used as the axis parameters of the 3D crossplot. To perform SFM, pseudo GR and pseudo log data must be expressed mathematically with well log data. Linear multi-regression analysis was used to derive the mathematical relationships of the different parameters. The probability distributions of the pseudo GR and pseudo logs were extracted using these relationships. Using the probability distributions of the , pseudo GR log, and pseudo log, the data were augmented by Monte Carlo simulation. The trivariate probability density function (3D PDF) of each facies was determined by the mean and covariance of the augmented data. The pseudo GR log and pseudo log volumes were extracted using a probabilistic neural network. Finally, a Bayesian inference was applied to calculate the facies probabilities using the 3D PDFs. We confirmed that the proposed method is more effective than the conventional reservoir characterisation method using 2D crossplot of SFM results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1696151
2020-05-03
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avseth, P., T. Mukerji, and G. Mavko 2005Quantitative seismic interpretation: applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Blazak, D., G. Smith, D. Baker, C. Falconer, J. DePledge, C. McNamara, B. Jury, G. Johnston, and R. Gupta 2015 Vincent multi-lateral drilling: use of 4D seismic, scenario analysis and deep directional resistivity for geo-steering, completions and anti-collision analysis to re-develop a thin oil field, offshore Carnarvon sub-basin, Australia: International Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia, 510.
  3. Bosch, M., Zamora, M., and Utama, W. 2002 Lithology discrimination from physical rock properties. Geophysics67(2): 573–81. doi: 10.1190/1.1468618
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1468618 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, H., J.P. Castagna, R.L. Brown, and A.C. Ramos 2001 Three-parameter AVO crossplotting in anisotropic media. Geophysics66 no. 5: 1359–63. doi: 10.1190/1.1487081
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487081 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chi, X.G., and D.H. Han 2009 Lithology and fluid differentiation using a rock physics template. The Leading Edge28 no. 1: 60–65. doi: 10.1190/1.3064147
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3064147 [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, J., B. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Byun 2017 Probabilistic facies analysis using 3D crossplot of stochastic forward-modeling results. 87th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3077–81.
  7. Chopra, S., V. Alexeev, and Y. Xu 2003 3D AVO crossplotting? An effective visualization technique. The Leading Edge22 no. 11: 1078–89. doi: 10.1190/1.1634911
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1634911 [Google Scholar]
  8. Close, D., R. Taylor, and S. Nixon 2015 Rock physics and quantitative interpretation using lambda–mu–rho in the Shipwreck Trough, Otway Basin: ASEG, Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
  9. Doyen, P.M. 2007 Seismic reservoir characterization: an earth modelling perspective, EAGE.
  10. Gallop, J. 2006 Facies probability from mixture distributions with non-stationary impedance errors. 76th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1801–4.
  11. Goodway, B., T. Chen, and J. Downton 1997 Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petrophysical parameters: “λρ”, “µρ”, & “λ/µ fluid stack”: from P and S inversions. 67th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 183–6.
  12. Grana, D. 2018 Joint facies and reservoir properties inversion. Geophysics83 no. 3: M15–24. doi: 10.1190/geo2017‑0670.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0670.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hampson, D.P., B.H. Russell, and B. Bankhead 2005 Simultaneous inversion of prestack seismic data. 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1633–7.
  14. Hampson, D.P., J.S. Schuelke, and J.A. Quirein 2001 Use of multiattribute transforms to predict log properties from seismic data. Geophysics66 no. 1: 220–36. doi: 10.1190/1.1444899
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444899 [Google Scholar]
  15. Iman, R.L., and W.J. Conover 1982 A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation11 no. 3: 311–34. doi: 10.1080/03610918208812265
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918208812265 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lamont, M., T. Thompson, and C. Bevilacqua 2008 Drilling success as a result of probabilistic lithology and fluid prediction: a case study in the Carnarvon Basin, WA. The APPEA Journal48 no. 1: 31–42. doi: 10.1071/AJ07004
    https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ07004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Loro, R., R. Hill, M. Jackson, and T. Slate 2015 Technologies that have transformed the Exmouth into Australia’s premier oil producing basin. The APPEA Journal55 no. 1: 233–46. doi: 10.1071/AJ14018
    https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ14018 [Google Scholar]
  18. Michelena, R.J., K.S. Godbey, and P.E. Rodrigues 2010 Facies probabilities from multidimensional crossplots of seismic attributes. 80th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1377–81.
  19. Mildenhall, S.J. 2005 Correlation and aggregate loss distributions with an emphasis on the Iman–Conover Method. Report of the research working party on correlations and dependencies among all risk sources, Casualty Actuarial Society.
  20. Ng, S., P. Dahle, R. Hauge, and O. Kolbjørsen 2008 Estimation of facies probabilities on the Snorre Field using geostatistical AVA inversion. 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1971–1974.
  21. Nieto, J., B. Batlai, and F. Delbecq 2013 Seismic lithology prediction: a Montney shale gas case study. CSEG Recorder38: 34–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pendrel, J., H. Schouten, and R. Bornard 2017 Bayesian estimation of petrophysical facies and their applications to reservoir characterization. 87th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3082–6.
  23. Reine, C. 2014 Quantitative interpretation guided by rock–physics templates: examples from unconventional reservoirs. 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2397–402.
  24. Rose, C., and M.D. Smith 2002Mathematical statistics with mathematica. Berlin: Springer.
  25. Ross, C.P. 2000 Effective AVO crossplot modeling: a tutorial. Geophysics65 no. 3: 700–11. doi: 10.1190/1.1444769
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444769 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ross, C.P., and M.A. Sparlin 2000 Improved crossplot analysis using visualization techniques. The Leading Edge19 no. 11: 1188–99. doi: 10.1190/1.1438504
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438504 [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith, T.M., C.H. Sondergeld, and C.S. Rai 2003 Gassmann fluid substitutions: a tutorial. Geophysics68 no. 2: 430–40. doi: 10.1190/1.1567211
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1567211 [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, Z., and A.M. Nur 1989 Seismic and acoustic velocities in reservoir rock: recent development. Society of Exploration Geophysicists10.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Whitcombe, D.N., P.A. Connolly, and R.L. Reagan 2002 Extended elastic impedance for fluid and lithology prediction. Geophysics67 no. 1: 63–67. doi: 10.1190/1.1451337
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1451337 [Google Scholar]
  30. Whitcombe, D.N., and J.G. Fletcher 2001 The AIGI crossplot as an aid to AVO analysis and calibration. 71st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 219–22.
  31. Wood, A.W. 1955A textbook of sound. New York: The MacMillan Co.
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1696151
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2019.1696151
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error