A damped forward EMI model for a horizontally stratified earth

References

1. Abramowitz, M.1972, July. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. New York (NY): Wiley.
2. Anderson, W. L.1979. Computer program: Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders O and 1 by adaptive digital filtering. Geophysics44, no. 7: 1287–305.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beamish, D.2011, October. Low induction number, ground conductivity meters: A correction procedure in the absence of magnetic effects. Journal of Applied Geophysics75, no. 2: 244–53.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bongiovanni, M., Bonomo, N., de la Vega, M., Martino, L., and Osella, A.. 2008, March. Rapid evaluation of multifrequency EMI data to characterize buried structures at a historical Jesuit Mission in Argentina. Journal of Applied Geophysics64, no. 1: 37–46.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Callegary, J. B., Ferré, T. P. A., and Groom, R. W.. 2007. Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments. Vadose Zone Journal6, no. 1: 158–67.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L., and Constable, C. G.. 1987, March. Occam's inversion; A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics52, no. 3: 289–300.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Smedt, P., Van Meirvenne, M., Saey, T., Baldwin, E., Gaffney, C., and Gaffney, V.. 2014, October. Unveiling the prehistoric landscape at Stonehenge through multi-receiver EMI. Journal of Archaeological Science50: 16–23.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Delefortrie, S., Saey, T., Van De Vijver, E., De Smedt, P., Missiaen, T., Demerre, I., and Van Meirvenne, M.. 2014, January. Frequency domain electromagnetic induction survey in the intertidal zone: Limitations of low-induction-number and depth of exploration. Journal of Applied Geophysics100: 14–22.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Frischknecht, F. C., and Keller, G. V.. 1966. Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
10. Geonics. 2018. Geophysical Instrumentation for Geology, Military, Environment, Agriculture, Archaeology, and Geotechnical Studies.
11. GF instruments. 2018. GF Instruments s.r.o.
12. Gradshteyn, I. S., Ryzhik, I. M., and Geronimus, Y. V.. 1973. Table of integrals, series and products. 4th ed., 7th print. ed.New York (NY): Academic Press.
13. Hatch, M.2017. Environmental geophysics: Low induction number approximation. Preview2017, no. 191: 37–8.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hendrickx, J. M. H., Baerends, B., Raza, Z. I., Sadig, M., and Chaudhry, M. A.. 1992. Soil salinity assessment by electromagnetic induction of irrigated land. Soil Science Society of America Journal56, no. 6: 1933–41.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hendrickx, J. M. H., Borchers, B., Corwin, D. L., Lesch, S. M., Hilgendorf, A. C., and Schlue, J.. 2002. Inversion of soil conductivity profiles from electromagnetic induction measurements. Soil Science Society of America Journal66, no. 3: 673–85.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hermans, T., and Irving, J.. 2017, February. Facies discrimination with electrical resistivity tomography using a probabilistic methodology: Effect of sensitivity and regularisation. Near Surface Geophysics15, no. 1: 13–25.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hermans, T., Vandenbohede, A., Lebbe, L., Martin, R., Kemna, A., Beaujean, J., and Nguyen, F.. 2012, May. Imaging artificial salt water infiltration using electrical resistivity tomography constrained by geostatistical data. Journal of Hydrology438–439: 168–80.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Himi, M., Tapias, J., Benabdelouahab, S., Salhi, A., Rivero, L., Elgettafi, M., El Mandour, A., Stitou, J., and Casas, A.. 2017, February. Geophysical characterization of saltwater intrusion in a coastal aquifer: The case of Martil–Alila plain (North Morocco). Journal of African Earth Sciences126: 136–47.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Holman, I. P., and Hiscock, K. M.. 1998, February. Land drainage and saline intrusion in the coastal marshes of northeast Norfolk. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology31, no. 1: 47–62.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jackson, J. D.1975, October. Classical electrodynamics. 2nd ed.New York: Wiley.
21. Kirsch, A.2011, January. Introduction to the mathematical theory of inverse problems. 2nd ed.New York: Springer New York.
22. McNeill, J. D.1980. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Technical report, Geonics.
23. Mester, A., Kruk, J. V. D., Zimmermann, E., and Vereecken, H.. 2011, November. Quantitative two-layer conductivity inversion of multi-configuration electromagnetic induction measurements. Vadose Zone Journal10, no. 4: 1319–30.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Minsley, B. J.2011, October. A trans-dimensional Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for model assessment using frequency-domain electromagnetic data. Geophysical Journal International187, no. 1: 252–72.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Moghadas, D., AndréF., Slob, E. C., Vereecken, H., and Lambot, S.. 2010, September. Joint full-waveform analysis of off-ground zero-offset ground penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction synthetic data for estimating soil electrical properties. Geophysical Journal International182, no. 3: 1267–78.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Reid, J., and Howlett, A.. 2001, December. Application of the EM-31 terrain conductivity meter in highly-conductive regimes. Exploration Geophysics32, no. 3/4: 219–24.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Reid, J. E., and Macnae, J. C.. 1999, June. Doubling the effective skin depth with a local source. Geophysics64, no. 3: 732–8.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Saey, T., De Smedt, P., Delefortrie, S., Van De Vijver, E., and Van Meirvenne, M.. 2015, March. Comparing one- and two-dimensional EMI conductivity inverse modeling procedures for characterizing a two-layered soil. Geoderma241–242: 12–23.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Saey, T., De Smedt, P., Meerschman, E., Islam, M. M., Meeuws, F., Van De Vijver, E., Lehouck, A., and Van Meirvenne, M.. 2012, January. Electrical conductivity depth modelling with a multireceiver EMI sensor for prospecting archaeological features. Archaeological Prospection19, no. 1: 21–30.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Senos Matias, M., Marques da Silva, M., Ferreira, P., and Ramalho, E.. 1994, August. A geophysical and hydrogeological study of aquifers contamination by a landfill. Journal of Applied Geophysics32, no. 2: 155–62.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Triantafilis, J., Wong, V., Santos, F. A. M., Page, D., and Wege, R.. 2012, July. Modeling the electrical conductivity of hydrogeological strata using joint-inversion of loop-loop electromagnetic dataJoint inversion of EM data. Geophysics77, no. 4: WB99–WB107.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Wait, J. R.1954, December. Induction in a conducting sheet by a small current-carrying loop. Applied Scientific Research, Section B3, no. 1: 230–6.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Wait, J. R.1962, June. A note on the electromagnetic response of a stratified Earth. Geophysics27, no. 3: 382–5.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wait, J. R.1982, July. Geo-Electromagnetism. Oxford: Academic Press.