1887
Volume 51, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Airborne geophysics provides one of the most relevant data for uranium exploration. However, the application of radiometric surveys is decreasing considerably as the depth of exploration is increasing. Notwithstanding, there is still a large potential for radiometric data, especially using recent data processing techniques such as machine learning methods. In this work, we propose a new method to detect uranium anomalies through regression using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm (RF). The RF regression allows combining airborne geophysical data to predict the expected uranium content, which represents the uranium content generated by environmental effects such as lithology and pedogenesis. Therefore, the deviation (Ud) between the measured uranium and the expected uranium represents the secondary effects such as weathering, soil alteration, hydrothermal alteration or mineralisation process. We evaluated the relevance of the geophysical parameters proposed by previous authors in the prediction of the expected uranium (thorium, thorium potassium ratio, uranium potassium ratio, and Total Gradient Amplitude). Randomly selecting only 10% of the database as training data, we estimate the expected uranium with an 2 = 0.99 concerning the measured uranium. To assess the reliability of the Ud anomalies, we employed the proposed methodology in the Carajás Mineral Province (CMP), Brazil. In the CPM, the Ud anomalies showed a clear correlation with the several Iron Oxide Copper–Gold deposits (IOCG) and some IOCG-related and granite-related prospects. In situ measurements with a portable gamma-ray spectrometer in the Salobo mine supported the uranium anomalies. The Ud map also highlighted contrasts within granites that correlate with previously reported granitic facies. Therefore, the Ud map generated by RF regression is useful in setting exploration targets for conventional and unconventional uranium resources, as well as in high-detail granitic facies mapping.

© 2020 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysics
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1725387
2020-09-02
2026-01-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1725387
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, J.A.S., and P.Gasparini. 1970. Gamma-ray spectrometry of rocks. Vol. 10, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  2. Barros, C.E.M., M.J.B.Macambira, P.Barbey, and T.Scheller. 2004. Dados isotópicos Pb-Pb em zircão (evaporação) e Sm-Nd do Complexo Granítico Estrela, província Mineral de carajás, Brasil: implicações petrológicas e tectônicas. Revista Brasileira de Geociências34, no. 4: 531–538. doi:10.25249/0375-7536.2004344531538.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Breiman, L.2001. Random Forest. Machine Learning45, no. 1: 5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Breiman, L., J.Friedman, R.A.Olshen, and C.J.Stone. 1984. Classification and regression trees (the Wadsworth statistics and probability series). Vol. 1. New York: Wadsworth International Group.
  5. Costa, I.S.L., J.K.M.Oliveira, F.M.Tavares, and R.R.de Paula. 2017. Caracterização Geofísica de Depósitos IOCG ao longo do Lineamento Cinzento, Província Mineral de Carajás. Poster presented at 15° Simpósio de Geologia Da Amazônia, Belém.
  6. Costa, I.S.L., F.M.Tavares, and J.K.M.de Oliveira. 2019. Predictive lithological mapping through machine learning methods: A case study in the Cinzento Lineament, Carajás Province, Brazil. Journal of Geological Survey of Brazil2, no. 1: 26–36. doi:10.29396/jgsb.2019.v2.n1.3.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Costa, U.A.P., R.R.de Paula, D.P.B.Silva, J.P.O.Barbosa, C.M.G.Silva, F.M.Tavares, J.K.M.Oliveira, and A.P.Justo. 2016. Mapa de integração geológico-geofísica da ARIM Carajás. Belém: Programa Geologia do Brasil, Serviço Geológico do Brasil.
  8. Cracknell, M., and A.Reading. 2014. Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information. Computers & Geosciences63: 22–33. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.008.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cracknell, M., A.Reading, and A.W.McNeill. 2014. Mapping geology and volcanic-hosted massive sulfide alteration in the Hellyer-Mt Charter region, Tasmania, using Random Forests (TM) and self-organising maps. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences61, no. 2: 287–304. doi:10.1080/08120099.2014.858081.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Curto, J.B., A.C.B.Pires, A.M.Silva, and ÁPCrósta. 2012. The role of airborne geophysics for detecting hydrocarbon microseepages and related structural features: The case of Remanso do Fogo, Brazil. Geophysics77, no. 2: B35–B41. doi:10.1190/geo2011-0098.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dall’Agnol, R., N.Teixeira, O.Ramo, C.Moura, M.Macambira, and D.Oliveira. 2005. Petrogenesis of the Paleoproterozoic rapakivi A-type granites of the Archean Carajás metallogenic province, Brazil. Lithos80: 101–129. doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2004.03.058.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Demšar, J., T.Curk, A.Erjavec, C.Gorup, T.Hocevar, M.Milutinovic, M.Možina, et al.2013. Orange: Data mining toolbox in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research14: 2349–2353.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Feio, G., R.Dall’Agnol, E.Dantas, M.Macambira, J.Santos, F.Althoff, and J.Soares. 2013. Archean granitoid magmatism in the Canaã dos Carajás area: Implications for crustal evolution of the Carajás province, Amazonian craton, Brazil. Precambrian Research227: 157–185. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2012.04.007.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Foote, R.S.1969. Improvement in airborne gamma-radiation data analyses for anomalous radiation by removal of environmental and pedologic radiation changes. Vol. 1, nuclear techniques and Mineral resources. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
  15. Fraga, L.M., M.L.Vazques, M.Almeida, A.M.Dreher, and N.Reis. 2017. A influência da orogenia eo-orosiriana na formação da slip Uatumã, parte central do Craton Amazônico. 15° Simpósio de Geologia da Amazônia, SBG, Expanded Abstracts.
  16. Gao, Y., Z.Zhang, Y.Xiong, and R.Zuo. 2016. Mapping mineral prospectivity for Cu polymetallic mineralization in southwest Fujian Province, China. Ore Geology Reviews75: 16–28. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.12.005.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Grainger, C.J., D.I.Groves, F.H.B.Tallarico, and I.R.Fletcher. 2008. Metallogenesis of the Carajás Mineral Province, southern Amazon Craton, Brazil: Varying styles of Archean through Paleoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic base- and precious-metal mineralization. Ore Geology Reviews33: 451–489. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2006.10.010.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Heider, M.2016. Urânio. In Anuário Mineral Brasileiro: Principais Substâncias Metálicas, ed. W. F.Pinheiro, O. B.Ferreira Filho, and C. A. R.Neves, 70–90. Brasilia: Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hitzman, M., N.Oreskes, and M.Einaudi. 1992. Geological characteristics and tectonic setting of proterozoic iron oxide (Cu-U-Au-LREE) deposits. Precambrian Research58: 241–287. doi:10.1016/0301-9268(92)90121-4.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hitzman, M., and R.Valenta. 2005. Uranium in iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) systems. Economic Geology100, no. 8: 1657–1661. doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.100.8.1657.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hunter, J.D.2007. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering9, no. 3: 90–95. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 1991. Airborne gamma ray spectrometry surveying. International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Reports Series No. 323. Austria, Vienna: 116 p. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/22/072/22072114.pdf.
  23. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2003. Guidelines for radioelement mapping using gamma ray spectrometric data. International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Reports Series No. 1326. Austria, Vienna: 179 p. https://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/te_1363_web.pdf.
  24. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2016. Uranium 2016: Resources, production and demand. Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency Report. https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2016/7301-uranium-2016.pdf.
  25. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2018. Geological classification of uranium deposits and description of selected examples. International Atomic Energy Agency. https://www.iaea.org/publications/12346/geological-classification-of-uranium-deposits-and-description-of-selected-examples.
  26. Kuhn, S., M.Cracknell, and A.M.Reading. 2018. Lithological mapping using Random Forests applied to geophysical and remote sensing data: A demonstration study from the Eastern Goldfields of Australia. Geophysics83, no. 4: 1–37. doi:10.1190/geo2017-0590.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuhn, S., M.J.Cracknell, and A.M.Reading. 2019. Lithological mapping in the Central African copper belt using random forests and clustering: Strategies for optimised results. Ore Geology Reviews112: 103015. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.103015.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. LASA, engenharia e prospecções S/A. 2010. Relatório final do levantamento e processamento dos dados magnetométricos e gamaespectrométricos do Projeto Aerogeofísico Tucuruí. Programa Geologia do Brasil (PGB).
  29. LASA, engenharia e prospecções S/A. 2015. Relatório final do levantamento e processamento dos dados magnetométricos e gamaespectrométricos do Projeto Aerogeofísico Oeste do Carajás. Programa Geologia do Brasil (PGB).
  30. Li, X.2006. Understanding 3D analytic signal amplitude. Geophysics71, no. 2: L13–L16. doi:10.1190/1.2184367.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Machado, N., Z.Lindenmayer, T.E.Krogh, and D.Lindenmayer. 1991. U-Pb geochronology of Archean magmatism and basement reactivation in the Carajás area, Amazon shield, Brazil. Precambrian Research49, no. 3: 329–354. doi:10.1016/0301-9268(91)90040-H.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McKay, G., and J.Harris. 2016. Comparison of the data-driven random forests model and a knowledge-driven method for mineral prospectivity mapping: A case study for gold deposits around the Huritz Group and Nueltin Suite, Nunavut, Canada. Natural Resources Research25, no. 2: 125–143. doi:10.1007/s11053-015-9274-z.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Melo, G., L.Monteiro, R.Xavier, C.Moreto, R.Arquaz, and M.A.Silva. 2019. Evolution of the Igarapé Bahia Cu-Au deposit, Carajás Province (Brazil): Early syngenetic chalcopyrite overprinted by IOCG mineralization. Ore Geology Reviews111: 102993. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.102993.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Moreto, C.P.N., L.V.S.Monteiro, R.P.Xavier, R.A.Creaser, S.A.DuFrane, G.H.C.Melo, M.A.Delinardo da Silva, C.C.G.Tassinari, and K.Sato. 2015. Timing of multiple hydrothermal events in the iron oxide–copper–gold deposits of the southern copper belt, Carajás Province, Brazil. Minereralium Deposita50, no. 5: 517–546. doi:10.1007/s00126-014-0549-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nabighian, M.N.1972. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section – its properties and use of automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics37, no. 3: 507–517. doi:10.1190/1.1440276.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Pedregosa, F., G.Varoquaux, A.Gramfort, V.Michel, B.Thirion, O.Grisel, M.Blondel, P.Prettenhofer, R.Weiss, and V.Dubourg. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research12: 2825–2830.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Pinheiro, R., and R.Holdsworth. 1997. Reactivation of Archaean strike-slip fault systems, Amazon region, Brazil. Journal of the Geological Society154, no. 1: 99–103. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.154.1.0099.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Pinheiro, R.V.L., K.Kadekaru, A.V.Soares, C.Freitas, S.N.Ferreira, and F.M.V.Matos. 2013. Carajás, Brazil – a short tectonic review. 15° Simpósio de Geologia da Amazônia, SBG, Expanded Abstracts.
  39. Pires, A., A.Carmelo, and M.Martins-Ferreira. 2019. Statistical enhancement of airborne gamma-ray uranium anomalies: Minimizing the lithological background contribution in mineral exploration. Journal of Geochemical Exploration198: 100–113. doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.12.014.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pollard, P., R.G.Taylor, L.Peters, F.M.V.Matos, C.O.Freitas, L.Saboia, and S.Bacelar. 2018. 40Ar-39Ar dating of Archean iron oxide Cu-Au and Paleoproterozoic granite-related Cu-Au deposits in the Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil: Implications for genetic models. Mineralium Deposita54, no. 3: 329–346. doi:10.1007/s00126-018-0809-1.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Prospectors, aerolevantamentos e sistemas LTDA (Prospetors). 2015. Relatório final do levantamento e processamento dos dados magnetométricos e gamaespectrométricos do Projeto Aerogeofísico Rio Maria. Programa Geologia do Brasil (PGB).
  42. Radford, D.D.G., M.Cracknell, M.Roach, and G.Cumming. 2018. Geological mapping in western Tasmania using radar and Random Forests. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing PP99: 1–13. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2855207.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Reeve, J.S., K.C.Cross, R.N.Smith, and N.Oreskes. 1990. Olympic dam copper-uranium-gold-silver deposit. In Geology of the mineral deposits of Australia and Papua New Guinea, ed. F.E. Hughes, Vol. 14, 1009–1035. Parkville: Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Saunders, D., K.Burson, J.Branch, and C.Thompson. 1993. Relation of thorium-normalized surface and aerial radiometric data to subsurface petroleum accumulations. Geophysics58, no. 10: 1417–1427. doi:10.1190/1.1443357.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Song, X., Z.Duan, and X.Jiang. 2012. Comparison of artificial neural networks and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification in northern China using a SPOT-5 HRG image. International Journal of Remote Sensing33, no. 10: 3301–3320. doi:10.1080/01431161.2011.568531.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Tavares, F.M., and I.S.L.Costa. 2018. Conventional and unconventional uranium resources in the Carajás Mineral Province – Brazil: Prospectivity criteria for IOCG and granite-related deposits. International symposium on uranium raw material for the nuclear fuel cycle: Exploration, mining, production, supply and demand, economics and environmental issues (URAM-2018), IAEA, Expanded Abstracts, Vienna, Austria.
  47. Tavares, F.M., R.A.J.Trouw, M.G.da Silva, A.P.Justo, and J.K.M.Oliveira. 2018. The multistage tectonic evolution of the northeastern Carajás Province, Amazonian Craton, Brazil: Revealing complex structural patterns. Journal of South American Earth Sciences88C: 238–252. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2018.08.024.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tazava, E., and C.Oliveira. 2000. The Igarapé Bahia Au-Cu-(REE-U) deposit, Carajás mineral province, northern Brazil. In Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold & related deposits: A global perspective, ed. T. M.Porter, 203–212. Adelaide: Australian Mineral Foundation.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Teruiya, R., W.Paradella, A.Santos, R.Dall’Agnol, and P.Veneziani. 2008. Integrating airborne SAR, Landsat TM and airborne geophysics data for improving geological mapping in the Amazon region: The Cigano granite, Carajás Province, Brazil. International Journal of Remote Sensing29, no. 13: 3957–3974. doi:10.1080/01431160801891838.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilford, J.R., P.E.Bierwirth, and M.A.Craig. 1997. Application of airborne gamma-ray spectrometry in soil/regolith mapping and applied geomorphology. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics17, no. 2: 201–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Xavier, R.P., L.V.S.Monteiro, C.R.Souza Filho, I.Torresi, E.R.Carvalho, A.M.Dreher, M.Wiedenbeck, R.B.Trumbull, A.L.S.Pestilho, and C.P.N.Moreto. 2010. The iron oxide copper-gold deposits of the Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil: an updated and critical review. In Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold & related deposits: A global perspective, ed. T. M.Porter, 285–306. Adelaide: Australian Mineral Foundation.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang, Z., R.Zuo, and Y.Xiong. 2016. A comparative study of fuzzy weights of evidence and Random Forests for mapping mineral prospectivity for skarn-type Fe deposits in the southwestern Fujian metallogenic belt, China. Science China Earth Science59, no. 3: 556–572. doi:10.1007/s11430-015-5178-3.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1725387
Loading
Uranium anomalies detection through Random Forest regression
Exploration Geophysics 51, 555 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2020.1725387
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1725387
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1725387
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): Airborne geophysics; exploration methodologies; magnetics; mineral geophysics; radiometrics; uranium exploration

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error