1887
Volume 52, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Microseismic monitoring provides important information on the locations and moment tensors of microseismic events, and this information can be used to understand the behaviour of the fractures more completely. Characterisations of fractures are used to investigate flow paths and for noninvasive investigation of shale gas sites, geothermal developments, and radioactive waste storage/disposal sites. The locations of microseismic events can be used to estimate the geometry and distribution of fractures and faults, and the moment tensors provide information on the orientations of fracture planes and event magnitudes. We propose an effective fracture network imaging method using microseismic event locations and their moment tensors. For this purpose, the conventional Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) method was improved so that fracture planes could be extracted quickly and efficiently from point cloud data. In addition, through the application of Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) to the microseismic event location data and moment tensor information, the accuracies of the locations and the orientations of fracture planes were improved. The developed algorithm was applied to synthetic data, including event locations and noise errors. The results showed that the developed method could extract the fracture planes reliably. Furthermore, the input parameters used in the proposed algorithm were examined, and the results of the conventional RANSAC method and the developed algorithm were compared. Finally, our method was applied to microseismic field data obtained from a shale gas/oil play, and the result accurately depicted the dominant strike of fracture planes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1761760
2021-01-02
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K., and P.G.Richard. 2002. Quantitative Seismology. University Science Book.
  2. Alghalandis, Y.F., P.A.Dowd, and C.Xu. 2013. The RANSAC method for generating fracture networks from micro-seismic event data. Mathematical Geosciences45: 207–24. doi: 10.1007/s11004‑012‑9439‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9439-9 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baig, A., and T.Urbancic. 2010. Microseismic moment tensors: A path to understanding fracture growth. The Leading Edge29 no. 3: 320–4. doi: 10.1190/1.3353729
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3353729 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cipolla, C.L., N.R.Warpinski, and M.J.Mayerhofer. 2008. Hydraulic fracture complexity: Diagnosis, remediation, and exploitation. SPE Asia pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, Society of PetroleumEngineers, in Perth, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ester, M., H.P.Kriegel, J.Sander, and X.Xu. 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. KDD, 96:226–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischler, M.A., and R.C.Bolles. 1981. RANSAC-based approach to model fitting and its application to finding cylinders in range data. IJCAI2:637–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jost, M.L., and R.B.Herrmann. 1989. A student’s guide to and review of moment tensors. Seismological Research Letters60: 37–57. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.60.2.37
    https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.60.2.37 [Google Scholar]
  8. Maxwell, S.C., T.I.Urbancic, and N.Steinsberger. 2002. Microseismic imaging of hydraulic fracture complexity in the Barnett Shale. SPE annualtechnical conference and exhibition, society of petroleum engineers, in San Antonio, Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Montgomery, C.T., and M.B.Smith. 2010. Hydraulic fracturing: A history of an enduring technology. Journal of Petroleum Technology62: 26–40. doi: 10.2118/1210‑0026‑JPT
    https://doi.org/10.2118/1210-0026-JPT [Google Scholar]
  10. Pytharouli, S.I., R.J.Lunn, Z.K.Shipton, J.D.Kirkpatrick, and A.F.do Nascimento. 2011. Microseismicity illuminates open fractures in the shallow crust. Geophysical Research Letters38:L02402. doi:10.1029/2010GL045875.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045875 [Google Scholar]
  11. Williams, M.J., J.H.Le Calvez, and J.Stokes. 2013. Towards self-consistent microseismic-based interpretation of hydraulic stimulation. 75th EAGE conference & exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013, in London, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, J., and J.Zhang. 2017. StimMAP Evaluation Report, Schlumberger.
  13. Xu, W., J.Calvez, and M.Thiercelin. 2009. Characterization of hydraulically induced fracture network using treatment and microseismic data in a tight-gas formation: A geochemical approach. SPE tightgas completions conference, society of petroleum engineers. SPE-125237-PA, in San Antonio, Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yu, X., J.Rutledge, S.Leaney, and S.Maxwell. 2016. Discrete-fracture-network generation from microseismic data by use of moment-tensor-and event-location-constrained Hough transforms. SPE Journal21: 221–232. doi: 10.2118/168582‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/168582-PA [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, H., R.M.Nadeau, and M.N.Toksoz. 2010. Locating nonvolcanic tremors beneath the San Andreas fault using a station-pair double-difference location method. Geophysical Research Letters37:L13304. doi: 10.1029/2010GL043577
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043577 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1761760
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1761760
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Borehole geophysics; computing; fractures; image processing; visualisation

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error