1887
Volume 52, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Least-square reverse time migration (LSRTM) can obtain high-resolution and high-amplitude preserved imaging results. Compared to the traditional migration methods, LSRTM can be robust and free of low-frequency artefacts. Under the first-order Born approximation, the corresponding scattering wave equation can only describe the wavefield under the approximate of weak perturbation. Nevertheless, in complicated media, weak scattering potential and small scatter assumptions are generally difficult to be satisfied. For inversion, with full wavefield information, the inversion results can be contaminated by artefacts caused by a strong scattering interface that to high-order scattered waves from strong scattering interfaces. To handle this problem, the first-order scattering wave equation is introduced as a penalty term to the LSRTM objective function, which can suppress the artefacts caused by the weak scattering hypothesis of the Born approximation. As a result, the LSRTM converts to an alternative optimisation problem: firstly, we need to find the optimal solution in the first-order scattered wavefield space. That is, by calculating a virtual source corresponding to the time-domain augmented wave equation, reconstructing an accurate first-order scattered wavefield based on the first-order scattering wave equation; secondly, an updated gradient of the reflectivity is then calculated based on the reconstructed first-order scattered wavefield. Therefore, the inverted reflectivity calculated according to the first-order scattered wavefield can be capable of obtaining the imaging results with high precision and high-amplitude preservation. Synthetic and real dataset results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767503
2021-01-02
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baysal, E., D.D.Kosloff, and J.W.Sherwood. 1983. Reverse time migration. Geophysics48, no. 11: 1514–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bezdek, J.C., and R.J.Hathaway. 2002a. Some notes on alternating optimization. In AFSS International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 288–300. Berlin: Springer.
  3. Bezdek, J.C., and R.J.Hathaway. 2002b. Some notes on alternating optimization. Paper presented at the AFSS International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.
  4. Bleistein, N., and S.H.Gray. 1985. An extension of the Born inversion procedure to depth dependent velocity profiles. Geophysical Prospecting33: 999–1022.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clayton, R.W., and R.H.Solt. 1981. A Born-WKBJ inversion method for acoustic reflection data. Geophysics46: 1559–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen, J.K., and N.Bleistein. 1979. Velocity inversion procedure for acoustic waves. Geophysics44: 1077–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dai, W., X.Wang, and G.Schuster. 2011. Least-squares migration of multisource data with a deblurring filter. Geophysics76, no. 5: R135–R146. doi:10.1190/geo2010‑0159.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0159.1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong, S., J.Cai, M.Guo, S.Suh, Z.Zhang, B.Wang, and Z.Li. 2012. Least squares reverse time migration: Towards true amplitude imaging and improving the resolution: 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1425–9.
  9. Golub, G., and V.Pereyra. 2003. Separable non-linear least squares: The variable projection method and its applications. Speech Communication45 no. 1: 63–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill, R.1990. Gaussian beam migration. Geophysics55: 1416–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hill, R.2001. Prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration. Geophysics66: 1240–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, Z.C., Y.Z.Lin, K.Zhang, Y.Y.Li, and Z.N.Yu. 2017. Time-domain wavefield reconstruction inversion. Applied Geophysics14, no. 4: 523–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, Q., and D.Peter. 2018. One-step data-domain least-squares reverse time migration. Geophysics83 no. 4: R361–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, Q., Y.Lu, H.Sun, and H.Zhang. 2020. Single-Step data-domain least-squares reverse-time migration using Gabor Deconvolution for subsalt imaging. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters17 no. 1: 13–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, Y.K., X.J.Liu, A.Osen, Y.Shao, H.Hu, and Y.C.Zheng. 2016. Least-squares reverse time migration using controlled-order multiple reflections. Geophysics81, no. 5: S347–S357. doi:10.1190/Geo2015‑0479.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/Geo2015-0479.1 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lu, Y., and Q.Liu. 2020. A comparison of two reflectivity parametrizations in acoustic least-squares reverse time migration. Exploration Geophysics51, no. 2: 256–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nemeth, T., C.Wu, and G.Schuster. 1999. Least-squares migration of incomplete reflection data. Geophysics64: 208–21. doi:10.1190/1.1444517.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444517 [Google Scholar]
  18. Peters, B., and F.J.Herrmann. 2017. Constraints versus penalties for edge-preserving full-waveform inversion. The Leading Edge36, no. 1: 94–100. doi:10.1190/tle36010094.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/tle36010094.1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Plessix, R.-E.2006. A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International167 no. 2: 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schuster, G.1993. Least-squares crosswell migration: 63rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 110–3.
  21. Symes, W.W.2008. Approximate linearized inversion by optimal scaling of prestack depth migration. Geophysics73: R23–R35.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tang, Y.2008. Wave-equation Hessian by phase encoding: 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2201–5.
  23. van Leeuwen, T., and F.J.Herrmann. 2013. Mitigating local minima in full-waveform inversion by expanding the search space. Geophysical Journal International195, no. 1: 661–667.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, C., D.Yingst, P.Farmer, and J.Leveille. 2016. Full-waveform inversion with the reconstructed wavefield method. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2016: 1237–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, J., H.Kuehl, and M.D.Sacchi. 2005. High-resolution wave-equation AVA imaging: Algorithm and tests with a data set from the Western Canadian sedimentary Basin. Geophysics70, no. 5: S91–S99. doi:10.1190/1.2076748.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2076748 [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, J., and M.D.Sacchi. 2007. High-resolution wave equation AVP imaging with sparseness constraints. Geophysics72 no. 1: S11–S18. doi:10.1190/1.2387139.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2387139 [Google Scholar]
  27. Weglein, A.B., H.Zhang, A.C.Ramrez, F.Liu, and J.E.M.Lira. 2009. Clarifying the underlying and fundamental meaning of the approximate linear inversion of seismic data. Geophysics74: WCD1–WCD13.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wei, O., W.Mao, X.Li, and W.Li. 2014. Seismic inversion with generalized Radon transform based on local second-order approximation of scattered field in acoustic media. Earthquake Science27, no. 4: 433–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wong, M., B.L.Biondi, and S.Ronen. 2015. Imaging with primaries and free-surface multiples by joint least-squares reverse time migration. Geophysics80, no. 6: S223–S235. doi:10.1190/Geo2015‑0093.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/Geo2015-0093.1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Yao, G., and H.Jakubowicz. 2012. Least-squares reverse-time migration: 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG. Expanded Abstracts, 3406–10.
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767503
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767503
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error