1887
Volume 52, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

We investigated reflection dispersion characteristics of a poroelastic layer with patchy saturations in seismic low-frequency range. Frequency-dependent attenuation and dispersion of phase velocity were determined with varying fluid saturation, porosity, permeability and heterogeneity size, using analytical solutions of a generalised 1D White’s model proposed here, obtained by incorporating capillary forces into the patchy saturation model. Numerical predictions were employed in combinations with an approximation for the complex and frequency-dependent reflection coefficient from an attenuating thin layer embedded in a dissipative background medium, so as to give a deep insight into the impacts of velocity dispersion and tuning, as well as acoustic impedance contrast, on the seismic low-frequency reflections. Results from this study suggest that wave-induced fluid flow in poroelastic media might account for low-frequency reflection signature anomalies that are associated with fluid saturation in the pore space. We also observed that seismic reflection coefficients of a partially saturated layer can vary strongly versus frequencies, especially in low-frequency range where high attenuation and dispersion can take place due to fluid partial saturation. Analysis of the crossplots of the magnitude for reflection coefficients and dispersion showed that attenuation, dispersion and tuning are more sensitive to gas saturation, porosity, and heterogeneity size. Thus the crossplot provides a useful means for detecting changes in fluid saturation and rock properties.

© 2020 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767504
2021-01-02
2026-01-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767504
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biot, M.1956. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid: I. Low-frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society America28: 168–78. doi: 10.1121/1.1908239
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908239 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brajanovski, M., T.M.Müller, and J.O.Parra. 2010. A model for strong attenuation and dispersion of seismic P-waves in a partially saturated fractured reservoir. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy53: 1383–7. doi: 10.1007/s11433‑010‑3205‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-010-3205-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carcione, J.M.2001. AVO effects of a hydrocarbon source-rock layer. Geophysics66: 419–27. doi: 10.1190/1.1444933
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444933 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carcione, J.M., and S.Picotti. 2006. P-wave seismic attenuation by slow-wave diffusion: effects of inhomogeneous rock properties. Geophysics71: O1–O8. doi: 10.1190/1.2194512
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2194512 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapman, M., E.Liu, and X.Y.Li. 2006. The influence of fluid-sensitive dispersion and attenuation on AVO analysis. Geophysical Journal International167: 89–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2006.02919.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02919.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Chapman, M., S.Maultzsch, E.R.Liu, and X.Y.Li. 2003. The effect of fluid saturation in an anisotropic multi-scale equant porosity model. Journal of Applied Geophysics54: 191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, S.Q., X.Y.Li, and S.X.Wang. 2012. The analysis of frequency-dependent characteristics for fluid detection: A physical model experiment. Applied Geophysics9: 195–206. doi: 10.1007/s11770‑012‑0330‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-012-0330-8 [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo, J.X., J.Rubino, S.Glubokovskikh, and B.Gurevich. 2018. Dynamic seismic signatures of saturated porous rocks containing two orthogonal sets of fractures: theory versus numerical simulations. Geophysical Journal International213: 1244–62. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggy040
     https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy040 [Google Scholar]
  9. Guo, Z.Q., C.Liu, X.Y.Li, and H.T.Lan. 2015. An improved method for the modeling of frequency-dependent amplitude-versus-offset variations. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Letters12: 63–7. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2409311
     https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2015.2409311 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gurevich, B., D.Makarynska, O.B.de Paula, and M.Pervukhina. 2010. A simple model for squirt-flow dispersion and attenuation in fluid-saturated granular rocks. Geophysics75: N109–20. doi: 10.1190/1.3509782
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3509782 [Google Scholar]
  11. He, Y.-X., S.X.Wang, and X.Y.Wu. 2020. Effects of patch size changes on the time-lapse seismic reflections of highly attenuating reservoirs. Journal of Applied Geophysics172: 103878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103878.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. He, Y.-X., X.Y.Wu, K.Fu, D.Zhou, and S.X.Wang. 2018. Modeling the effect of microscopic and mesoscopic heterogeneities on frequency-dependent attenuation and seismic signatures. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters15: 1174–8. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2829837
     https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2018.2829837 [Google Scholar]
  13. He, Y.-X., X.Y.Wu, S.X.Wang, and J.G.Zhao. 2019. Reflection dispersion signatures due to wave-induced pressure diffusion in heterogeneous poroelastic media. Exploration Geophysics50: 541–53. doi: 10.1080/08123985.2019.1606208
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2019.1606208 [Google Scholar]
  14. Korneev, V.A., G.M.Goloshubin, T.M.Daley, and D.M.Silin. 2004. Seismic low-frequency effects in monitoring fluid-saturated reservoirs. Geophysics69: 522–32. doi: 10.1190/1.1707072
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1707072 [Google Scholar]
  15. Müller, T., B.Gurevich, and M.Lebedev. 2010. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave-induced flow in porous rocks – a review. Geophysics75: A147–64. doi: 10.1190/1.3427636
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3427636 [Google Scholar]
  16. Pride, S.R., J.G.Berryman, and J.M.Harris. 2004. Seismic attenuation due to wave induced flow. Journal of Geophysical Research109: B01201. doi: 10.1029/2003JB002639
     https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002639 [Google Scholar]
  17. Qi, Q.M., T.M.Müller, B.Gurevich, S.Lopes, M.Lebedev, and E.Caspari. 2014a. Quantifying the effect of capillarity on attenuation dispersion in patchy-saturated rocks. Geophysics79: WB35–50. doi: 10.1190/geo2013‑0425.1
     https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0425.1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Qi, Q.M., T.M.Müller, and J.G.Rubino. 2014b. Seismic attenuation: effects of interfacial impedance on wave-induced pressure diffusion. Geophysical Journal International199: 1677–81. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu327
     https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu327 [Google Scholar]
  19. Quintal, B., S.M.Schmalholz, and Y.Y.Podladchikov. 2009. Low-frequency reflection from a thin layer with high attenuation caused by interlayer flow. Geophysics74: N15–23. doi: 10.1190/1.3026620
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3026620 [Google Scholar]
  20. Quintal, B., S.M.Schmalholz, and Y.Y.Podladchikpv. 2011a. Impact of fluid saturation on the reflection coefficient of a poroelastic layer. Geophysics76: N1–12. doi: 10.1190/1.3553002
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3553002 [Google Scholar]
  21. Quintal, B., S.Steeb, M.Frehner, and S.M.Schmalholz. 2011b. Quasi-static finite element modeling of seismic attenuation and dispersion due to wave-induced fluid flow in poroelastic media. Journal of Geophysical Research116: B1201. doi: 10.1029/2010JB007475
     https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007475 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ren, H.T., G.Goloshubin, and F.J.Hilterman. 2009. Poroelastic analysis of amplitude-versus-frequency variation. Geophysics74: N41–8. doi: 10.1190/1.3207863
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3207863 [Google Scholar]
  23. Rubino, J.G., D.R.Velis, and M.D.Sacchi. 2011. Numerical analysis of wave-induced fluid-flow effects on seismic data: application to monitoring of CO2 storage at the Sleipner field. Journal of Geophysical Research116: B03306. doi: 10.1029/2010JB007997
     https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007997 [Google Scholar]
  24. Rubino, J.G., and K.Holliger. 2013. Research note: seismic attenuation due to wave-induced fluid flow at microscopic and mesoscopic scales. Geophysical Prospecting61: 882–9. doi: 10.1111/1365‑2478.12009
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12009 [Google Scholar]
  25. Shi, P.D., D.A.Angus, and A.Nowacki. 2018. Microseismic full waveform modelling in anisotropic media with moment tensor implementation. Surveys in Geophysics39: 567–611. doi: 10.1007/s10712‑018‑9466‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9466-2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Toms, J., T.M.Müller, and B.Gurevich. 2007. Seismic attenuation in porous rocks with random patchy saturation. Geophysical Prospecting55: 671–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2007.00644.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00644.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Tserkovnyak, Y., and D.L.Johnson. 2003. Capillary forces in the acoustics of patchy-saturated porous media. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America114: 2596–606. doi: 10.1121/1.1621009
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1621009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, Y.J., S.Q.Chen, L.Wang, and X.Y.Li. 2013. Modeling and analysis of seismic wave dispersion based on the rock physics model. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering10: 054001.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. White, J.E.1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics40: 224–32. doi: 10.1190/1.1440520
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440520 [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao, L.X., D.H.Han, Q.L.Yao, R.Zhou, and F.Y.Yan. 2015. Seismic reflection dispersion due to wave-induced fluid flow in heterogeneous reservoir rocks. Geophysics80: D221–35. doi: 10.1190/geo2014‑0307.1
     https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0307.1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhao, L.X., H.M.Yuan, J.K.Yang, D.-H.Han, J.H.Geng, R.Zhou, H.Li, and Q.L.Yao. 2015. Mobility effect on poroelastic seismic signatures in partially saturated rocks with applications in time-lapse monitoring of a heavy oil reservoir. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth122: 8872–91.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767504
Loading
Analysis of wave dispersion and attenuation effects on seismic low-frequency reflections of a poroelastic layer
Exploration Geophysics 52, 77 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767504
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767504
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1767504
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attenuation; dispersion; low frequency; Rock physics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error