Seismic data random noise reduction using a method based on improved complementary ensemble EMD and adaptive interval threshold

References

1. Alireza, G., and A.R.Mohammad. 2012. Seismic coherent and random noise attenuation using the undecimated discrete wavelet transform method with WDGA technique. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering9 no. 6: 619–31. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/9/6/619.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Canales, L.1984. Random noise reduction: 54th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 525–527.doi:10.1190/1.1894168.
3. Chen, W.2017. Random noise reduction using a hybrid method based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Journal of Seismic Exploration26 no. 3: 227–49.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chen, Y.K., and J.T.Ma. 2014. Random noise attenuation by f-x empirical-mode decomposition predictive filtering. Geophysics79 no. 3: V81–9. doi:10.1190/geo2013-0080.1.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chen, Y.K., C.Zhou, J.Yuan, and Y.J.Zhao. 2014. Applications of empirical mode decomposition in random noise attenuation of seismic data. Journal of Seismic Exploration23 no. 6: 481–95.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chen, Y.K., and S.Fomel. 2015. Random noise attenuation using local signal-and-noise orthogonalization. Geophysics80 no. 6: WD1–9. doi:10.1190/geo2014-0227.1.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Colominas, M.A., G.Schlotthauer, and M.E.Torres. 2014. Improved complete ensemble EMD: A suitable tool for biomedical signal processing. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control14: 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.009.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Flandrin, P., G.Rilling, and P.Goncalves. 2004. Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank. IEEE Signal Processing Letters11: 112–14. doi:10.1109/LSP.2003.821662.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Flandrin, P., G.Rilling, and P.Gonçalvès. 2005. EMD equivalent filter banks, from interpetation to applications, in Hilbert-Huang Transform and Its Applications, N. E. Huang and S. Shen, Eds., 1st ed.doi:10.1142/9789812703347_0003.
10. Fomel, S., and Y.Liu. 2010. Seislet transform and seislet frame. Geophysics75 no. 3: V25–38. doi:10.1190/1.3380591.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gan, S.W., Y.K.Chen, S.H.Zu, et al.2015. Structure-oriented singular value decomposition for random noise attenuation of seismic data. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering12 no. 2: 262–72. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/12/2/262.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gómez, J.L., and D.R.Velis. 2015. A simple method inspired by empirical mode decomposition for denoising seismic data. Geophysics81 no. 6: V403–13. doi:10.1190/geo2015-0566.1.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Han, J.J., and M.Baan. 2015. Microseismic and seismic denoising via ensemble empirical mode decomposition and adaptive thresholding. Geophysics80 no. 6: KS69–80. doi:10.1190/geo2014-0423.1.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hojjat, H., and L.A.Gholami. 2014. Curvelet-TV regularized Bregman iteration for seismic random noise attenuation. Journal of Applied Geophysics109: 233–41. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.08.005.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Huang, N., Z.Shen, S.Long, M.Wu, H.Shih, Q.Zheng, N.Yen, et al.1998. Theempirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences454: 903–95. doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0193.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kong, D.H., and Z.M.Peng. 2015. Seismic random noise attenuation using shearlet and total generalized variation. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering12 no. 6: 1024–35. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/12/6/1024.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kopsinis, Y., and S.McLaughlin. 2009. Development of EMD-based denoising methods inspired by wavelet thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing57: 1351–62. doi:10.1109/TSP.2009.2013885.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Liu, W., S.Cao, S.Gan, Y.Chen, S.Zu, and Z.Jin. 2016. One-step slope estimation for dealiased seismic data reconstruction via iterative seislet thresholding. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters13 no. 10: 1462–66. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2016.2591939.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Liu, Y., C.Liu, and D.Wang. 2009. A 1D time-varying median filter for seismic random spike-like noise elimination. Geophysics74 no. 1: V17–24. doi:10.1190/1.3043446.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mandic, D., Z.Wu, and N.E.Huang. 2013. Empirical mode decompositionbased time- frequency analysis of multivariate signals: The power of adaptive data analysis. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine30 no. 6: 74–86. doi:10.1109/MSP.2013.2267931.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Rasoul, A., A.N.S.Mohammad, G.Saman, and R.K.Amin. 2017. Seismic random noise attenuation using synchrosqueezed wavelet transform and low-rank signal matrix approximation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing55 no. 11: 6574–81. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2017.2730228.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Robert, V.S.2015. EMD-seislet transform: SEG technical program expanded abstracts, 5634.
23. Shan, H., J.W.Ma, and H.Z.Yang. 2009. Comparisons of wavelets, contourlets and curvelets in seismic denoising. Journal of Applied Geophysics69 no. 2: 103–15. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.08.002.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Torres, M.E., M.A.Colominas, G.Schlotthauer, and P.Flandrin. 2011. Acomplete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise: Proc. 36th IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoust., Speech and Signal Process, 4144–4147.doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947265.
25. Wang, B., J.Li, and X.Chen. 2015a. A novel method for simultaneous seismic data interpolation and noise removal based on the L0 norm constraint. Journal of Seismic Exploration24 no. 2: 187–204.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Wang, B., X.Chen, J.Li, and J.Cao. 2016. An improved weighted projection onto convex sets method for seismic data interpolation and denoising. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing9 no. 1: 228–35.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Wang, B., R.-S.Wu, X.Chen, and J.Li. 2015b. Simultaneous seismic data interpolation and denoising with a new adaptive method based on dreamlet transform. Geophysical Journal International201 no. 2: 1180–92.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wu, Z., and N.E.Huang. 2004. A study of the characteristics of white noise using the empirical mode decomposition method. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical. Physical and Engineering Sciences460: 1597–611. doi:10.1098/rspa.2003.1221.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Wu, Z., and N.E.Huang. 2009. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis1 no. 1: 1–41. doi:10.1142/S1793536909000047.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Wu, Z.C., and T.Y.Liu. 2008. Wavelet transform methods in seismic data noise attenuation. Progress in Geophysics2: 493–99.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Yeh, J.R., J.S.Shieh, and N.E.Huang. 2010. Complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a novel noise enhanced data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis2 no. 02: 135–56. doi:10.1142/S1793536910000422.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Zhang, C., and B.Mirko. 2017. Multicomponent microseismic data denoising by 3D shearlet transform. Geophysics83 no. 3: A54–1. doi:10.1190/geo2017-0788.1.
    [Google Scholar]