Optimal finite-difference schemes for elastic wave based on improved cosine-combined window function

References

1. Alterman, Z., and F.C.KaralJr. 1968. Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite difference methods. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America58, no. 1: 367–98.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bashir, Y., and D.Prasad Ghosh. 2019. Advance wave modeling and diffractions for high-resolution subsurface seismic imaging. In Applied geophysics with case studies on environmental, exploration and engineering geophysics, ed. Ali Ismet Kanlı. IntechOpen.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baysal, E., D.D.Kosloff, and J.W.C.Sherwood. 1983. Reverse time migration. Geophysics48, no. 11: 1514–24. doi:10.1190/1.441434.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cheng, B.J., L.I.Xiao-Fan, and G.H.Long. 2008. Seismic waves modeling by convolutional Forsyte polynomial differentiator method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics51, no. 2: 378–85.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chu, C.L., and P.L.Stoffa. 2012. Determination of finite-difference weights using scaled binomial windows. Geophysics77: W17–W26. doi:10.1190/GEO2011-0336.1.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Diniz, P.S.R., E.A.B.D.Silva, and S.L.Netto, 2012. Digital signal processing system analysis and design. Beijing: China Machine Press.
7. Fornberg, B.1987. The pseudospectral method: Comparisons with finite differences for the elastic wave equation. Geophysics52: 483–501. doi:10.1190/1.1442319.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Huang, S., X.Fan, S.Liu, and S.Yang. 2010. Optimized combined cosine window functions with maximum side lobe decay speed for harmonic analysis. Information & Control39, no. 4: 435–40.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kelly, K.R., R.W.Ward, S.Treitel, and R. M.Alford. 2012. Synthetic seismograms – a finite-difference approach. Numerical Modeling of Seicmic Wave Propagation41: 2–27.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lee, C., and Y.Seo. 2002. A new compact spectral scheme for turbulence simulations. Journal of Computational Physics183, no. 2: 438–69. doi:10.1006/jcph.2002.7201.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Liu, Y.2013. Globally optimal finite-difference schemes based on least squares. Geophysics78: T113–T132. doi:10.1190/geo2012-0480.1.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Liu, Y., and M.K.Sen. 2009a. A new time–space domain high-order finite-difference method for the acoustic wave equation. Journal of Computational Physics228, no. 23: 8779–806. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.027.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Liu, Y., and M.K.Sen. 2009b. Numerical modeling of wave equation by a truncated high-order finite-difference method. Earthquake Science22, no. 2: 205–13. doi:10.1007/s11589-009-0205-0.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Madariaga, R.1976. Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America66, no. 3: 639–66.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Rao, Y., and Y.Wang. 2018. Seismic waveform simulation for models with fluctuating interfaces. Scientific Reports8, no. 1: 3098.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Wang, J., X.H.Meng, H.Liu, W.Q.Zheng, and S.Gui. 2017. Cosine-modulated window function-based staggered-grid finite-difference forward modeling. Applied Geophysics14, no. 1: 115–24.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Wang, Z.Y., H.Liu, X.D.Tang, and Y.Wang. 2014. Optimized finite-difference operators based on Chebyshev auto-convolution combined window function. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese)58, no. 2: 628–42.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Yang, L., H.Yan, and H.Liu. 2014. Elastic wave modeling with staggered-grid finite-difference based on least squares. Global Meeting. Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Chinese Petroleum Society.
19. Yang, L., H.Yan, and H.Liu. 2017. An optimal implicit staggered-grid finite-difference scheme based on the modified Taylor-series expansion with minimax approximation method for elastic modeling. Journal of Applied Geophysics138: 161–71.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Zhou, B.Z., and S.Greenhalgh. 1992. Seismic scalar wave equation modeling by a convolutional differentiator. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America82, no. 1: 289–303.
    [Google Scholar]