1887
Volume 52, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Staggered-grid finite-difference (SFD) method has higher accuracy and stability than conventional method, so it is widely used in reverse time migration and full waveform inversion. However, due to the high dominant frequency and large grid interval, numerical dispersion is an inevitable problem. To suppress numerical dispersion, we first propose a weighted convolution combination window function for SFD, which is based on traditional binomial window function. Accuracy error analysis shows that the spectral coverage of new method far exceeds that of the Taylor-expansion SFD method, and the new method also has better spectral coverage and stability than the previous optimisation methods. Finally, we perform numerical forward modelling, which denotes that our method is superior than other optimum methods. From an economic point of view, this method will effectively reduce the computation cost and improve efficiency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1838243
2021-09-03
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chu, C.L., and P.L.Stoffa. 2012. Determination of finite-difference weights using scaled binomial windows. Geophysics77: W17–W26. doi:10.1190/GEO2011-0336.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Diniz, P.S.R., E.A.B.Da Silva, and S.L.Netto. 2012. Digital signal processing system analysis and design. Beijing: China Machine Press.
  3. Holberg, O.2010. Computational aspects of the choice of operator and sampling interval for numerical differentiation in large-scale simulation of wave phenomena. Geophysical Prospecting35, no. 6: 629–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1987.tb00841.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00841.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Igel, H., P.Mora, and B.Riollet. 1995. Anisotropic wave propagation through finite-difference grids. Geophysics60, no. 4: 1203–16. doi:10.1190/1.1443849.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelly, K.R., R.W.Ward, S.Treitel, and R.M.Alford. 2012. Synthetic seismograms; a finite-difference approach. Numerical Modeling of Seicmic Wave Propagation41: 2–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kosloff, D.1982. Forward modeling by a Fourier method. Geophysics47, no. 10: 1402–1412. doi: 10.1190/1.1441288
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441288 [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, Y.2013. Globally optimal finite-difference schemes based on least squares. Geophysics78: T113–T132. doi:10.1190/geo2012-0480.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, Y., and M.K.Sen. 2009. Numerical modeling of wave equation by a truncated high-order finite-difference method. Earthquake Science22, no. 2: 205–13. doi:10.1007/s11589-009-0205-0.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Madariaga, R.1976. Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America66, no. 3: 639–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sun, W., B.Zhou, and L.-Y.Fu. 2015. A staggered-grid convolutional differentiator for elastic wave modeling. Journal of Computational Physics301: 59–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.08.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.08.017 [Google Scholar]
  11. Virieux, J.1984. SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media; velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics49, no. 11: 1933–42. doi:10.1190/1.1441605.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Z.Y., H.Liu, X.D.Tang, and Y.Wang. 2014. Optimized finite-difference operators based on Chebyshev auto-convolution combined window function. Chinese Journal of Geophysics58, no. 2: 628–42. doi:10.6038/cjg20150224. (In Chinese.)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, L., H.Yan, and H.Liu. 2014. Elastic wave modeling with staggered-grid finite-difference based on least squares. Global Meeting. Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Chinese Petroleum Society.
  14. Yang, L., H.Yan, and H.Liu. 2017. An optimal implicit staggered-grid finite-difference scheme based on the modified Taylor-series expansion with minimax approximation method for elastic modeling. Journal of Applied Geophysics138: 161–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.01.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.01.020 [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou, B.Z., and S.Greenhalgh. 1992. Seismic scalar wave equation modeling by a convolutional differentiator. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America82, no. 1: 289–303.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1838243
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2020.1838243
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 2D modelling; elastic; Finite difference; seismic exploration

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error