1887
Volume 53, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Airborne electromagnetic (AEM) survey data are typically inverted with one-dimensional (1D) AEM algorithms because 1D approaches are efficient methods for calculating subsurface conductivity and thickness variations. However, 1D AEM inversion algorithms are known to perform poorly in regions where the geology is 2D or 3D. In 2013, a regional-scale (5 km spaced) TEMPEST AEM survey was acquired across the regolith dominated sedimentary and volcano-sedimentary basin terrain of the Capricorn Orogen in Western Australia. In this contribution, we evaluate the efficacy of 1D inversions of this data to map the resistivity and thickness variations of the basin geology. The limitations of 1D inversions of the Capricorn Orogen AEM data were investigated through the synthetic forward modelling and inversion of two different geological examples: (1) the depth of detection and resolution of a (1 Ωm) conductor beneath conductive regolith, and (2) the geometry resolution of a dipping contact comparing both conductor-over-resistor and resistor-over-conductor scenarios. The main findings from this study are: (1) that 1D AEM inversions reliably resolve the depth of a conductor beneath conductive cover where it is located at approximately 100–150 m below cover, and (2) that dipping layers with a strike perpendicular to an AEM survey line can be accurately recovered when their apparent dip angle is less than 20°. These results are used to interpret the resistivity and thickness variations resolved along a 1D GA-LEI TEMPEST AEM inversion from the north-eastern Yerrida Basin of the Capricorn Orogen to show that there are limitations to the level of detail which can be interpreted from 1D AEM inversions, and that there are implications for interpreters using AEM methods to map sedimentary basin sequences and structure in deeply weathered terrains.

© 2021 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1898281
2022-01-02
2026-01-23

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1898281
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitken, A., S.Banaszczyk, M.Dentith, M.Lindsay, J.Shragge, P.Piña-Varas, D.Annetts, J.Austin, Y.Ley-Cooper, T.Munday, et al.2015. A major geophysical experiment in the Capricorn Orogeny, Western Australia. ASEG Extended Abstracts2015: 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, H.F., A.C.Duncan, and S.M.Lynch. 1993. Geological mapping capabilities of the QUESTEM airborne electromagnetic system for mineral exploration – Mt. Isa Inlier, Queensland. Exploration Geophysics24: 333–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Annetts, D., A.Raiche, and F.Sugeng. 2004. The time-domain electromagnetic response of wedge-like structures. ASEG Extended Abstracts2004: 1–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Annetts, D., F.Sugeng, J.Macnae, and A.Raiche. 2000. Modelling the airborne electromagnetic response of a vertical contact. Exploration Geophysics31: 115–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Auken, E., A.V.Christiansen, L.H.Jacobsen, and K.I.Sørensen. 2008. A resolution study of buried valleys using laterally constrained inversion of TEM data. Journal of Applied Geophysics65: 10–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bagas, L.1998. Marymia, WA map sheet 2847. Geological Survey of Western Australia.
  7. Banaszczyk, S.2019. Extracting reliable geological information from electromagnetic datasets in a Regolith dominated terrain: Capricorn Orogen, Western Australia. PhD. The University of Western Australia.
  8. Bishop, J., D.Sattel, J.Macnae, and T.Munday. 2001. Electrical structure of the regolith in the Lawlers district, Western Australia. Exploration Geophysics32: 20–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyd, G., and K.F.Frankcombe. 1994. Geophysical responses over the Scuddles VMS deposit. Exploration Geophysics25: 164.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brodie, R.2010. Holistic inversion of airborne electromagnetic data. PhD. The Australian National University.
  11. Brodie, R., A.Green, and T.J.Munday. 2004. Constrained inversion of RESOLVE airborne electromagnetic data – Riverland, South Australia. Bentley: CSIRO.
  12. Brodie, R.C.2006. User manual for geoscience Australia’s airborne electromagnetic inversion software.
  13. Brodie, R.C.2012. AEM inversion of VTEM data from a resistive terrain. ASEG Extended Abstracts2012: 1–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brodie, R.C.2015. GALEISBSTDEM: A deterministic algorithm for 1D sample by sample inversion of time-domain AEM data – theoretical details.
  15. Brodie, R.C., and M.T.Costelloe. 2011. Kombolgie VTEM AEM survey: Inversion report. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  16. Brodie, R.C., and A.Fisher. 2008. Inversion of TEMPEST AEM survey data honeysuckle creek. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  17. Brodie, R.C., and A.Y.Ley-Cooper. 2018. AusAEM year 1 NT/QLD airborne electromagnetic survey. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  18. Cantwell, N., M.Cooper, N.Martin, R.Sainty, M.Frater, and D.Denham. 2009. Review of the Jaguar Cu-Zn-Ag volcanogenic massive sulphide discovery and subsequent geophysical trails; a true blind geophysical discovery beneath deep conductive overburden. Preview Section 3: Abstracts2009: 54–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Caudillo-Mata, L., and L.Angélica. 2017. Multiscale and upscaling methods for geophysical electromagnetic forward modelling. PhD. University of British Columbia.
  20. Cawood, P.A., and I.M.Tyler. 2004. Assembling and reactivating the Proterozoic Capricorn Orogen: Lithotectonic elements, orogenies, and significance. Precambrian Research128: 201–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Christiansen, A., and E.Auken. 2012. A global measure for depth of investigation. Geophysics77: WB171–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Costelloe, M.T., and D.K.Hutchinson. 2010. Woolner granite and Rum jungle TEMPEST TM AEM surveys: Inversion report. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  23. Costelloe, M.T., I.C.Roach, and D.K.Hutchinson. 2012. Frome embayment TEMPEST AEM survey: Inversion report and data package (200 m) – version details. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  24. Craven, B.L., W.B.Hayden, and M.J.Smith. 1985. A comparison of electromagnetic prospecting results at the Scuddles Cu Zn massive sulphide deposit, Golden Grove area, Western Australia. Exploration Geophysics16: 194–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Danielsen, J.E., E.Auken, F.Jørgensen, V.Søndergaard, and K.I.Sørensen. 2003. The application of the transient electromagnetic method in hydrogeophysical surveys. Journal of Applied Geophysics53: 181–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. De Grey Mining Ltd. 2009. Surrender report Beyondie project, E52/1470 and E52/1491. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  27. Dentith, P.M., and S.T.Mudge. 2014. Geophysics for the mineral exploration geoscientist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety. 2020. GeoVIEW.WA.
  29. Dunbar, P., C.Stephens, and A.Carr. 2006. Mulgul project m52/776 & E52/1455 combined annual report C167/2005. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  30. Edgar, W.1994. Annual report period 18/07/93 to 17/07/94 Teague E69/562, 855, 856, 857, 858, 975 compiled: November, 1994. Department of Minerals and Energy.
  31. Elliott, J., and N.Wilson. 2005. Magellan Metals Pty Ltd annual report for the period 1/01/2004 to 31/12/2004 Magellan project, Yerrida Basin, WA tenement group C335/1992. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  32. Emerson, D., J.Macnae, and D.Sattel. 2000. Physical properties of the regolith in the Lawlers area, Western Australia. Exploration Geophysics31: 229–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Evans, R.2016a. Sandfire resources NL Springfield project e52/2282 partial surrender report. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  34. Evans, R.2016b. Sandfire resources NL Springfield project e52/2313 partial surrender report. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  35. Fitzpatrick, A.D.2006. Scale dependent electrical properties of sulphide deposits. PhD. University of Tasmania.
  36. Folkes, C.B.2017. An integrative approach to investigating crustal architecture and cover thickness in the Southern Thomson region. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  37. Geoscience Australia. 2014. Airborne electromagnetics. Australian Government, Geoscience Australia.
  38. Goldman, M., L.Tabarovsky, and M.Rabinovich. 1994. On the influence of 3-D structures in the interpretation of transient electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics59: 889–901.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Green, A., and R.Lane. 2003. Estimating noise levels in AEM data. ASEG Extended Abstracts2003: 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Green, A., and T.J.Munday. 2004. Forward modelling airborne electromagnetic data for the Riverland, South Australia. Bentley: CSIRO.
  41. Hannington, M.D.2014. 13.18 – volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits. In Treatise on geochemistry, 2nd ed., ed. H.D.Holland and K.K.Turekian, 463–88. Oxford: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hardy, L.2013. Six-mile creek fault M52/0776 final report for six mile creek co-funded drilling DAG2012/00099081 2013. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  43. Hashemi, A., and J.Meyers. 2004. HoistEM data processing for discovery of high grade manganese ore under regolith cover. ASEG Extended Abstracts2004: 1–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hodges, G., T.Chen, and R.van Buren. 2016. HELITEM detects the lalor VMS deposit. Exploration Geophysics47: 285–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Høyer, A.-S., F.Jørgensen, N.Foged, X.He, and A.V.Christiansen. 2015. Three-dimensional geological modelling of AEM resistivity data – a comparison of three methods. Journal of Applied Geophysics115: 65–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hughes, D., and J.Elliott. 2004. Magellan metals PTY LTD annual report for the period 01/01/2003 to 31/12/2003 Magellan project, Yerrida Basin, WA. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  47. Hutchinson, D.K., and M.T.Costelloe. 2010. Final data and inversions for the Cariewerloo traverses of the Frome AEM survey – inversion details. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  48. Hutchinson, D.K., M.T.Costelloe, I.C.Roach, and C.Sorensen. 2010. Paterson – TEMPEST AEM survey, Western Australia. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  49. Johnson, S.P.2013. The birth of supercontinents and the Proterozoic assembly of Western Australia. Perth: Geological Survey of Western Australia.
  50. Jørgensen, F., P.B.E.Sandersen, and E.Auken. 2003. Imaging buried quaternary valleys using the transient electromagnetic method. Journal of Applied Geophysics53: 199–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lane, R., R.Brodie, A.Fitzpatrick, S.R.B.McAlpine, S.Buckerfield, M.G.Nicoll, and M.Crowe. 2004. Constrained inversion of AEM data from the lower Balonne area, Southern Queensland, Australia. Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
  52. Lane, R., D.Heislers, and P.McDonald. 2001. Filling in the gaps? Validation and integration of airborne EM data with surface and subsurface observations for catchment management:? An example from Bendigo, Victoria, Australia. Exploration Geophysics32: 225–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Lawrie, K.C., J.Clarke, K.P.Tan, T.J.Munday, A.Fitzpatrick, R.S.Brodie, C.F.Pain, H.Apps, K.Cullen, L.Halas, et al.2010. Utilising airborne electromagnetics (AEM) to map key elements of the hydrogeological system and salinity hazard in the Ord Valley, Western Australia. ASEG Extended Abstracts2010: 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ley-Cooper, A.Y., J.Macnae, and A.Viezzoli. 2010. Breaks in lithology: Interpretation problems when handling 2D structures with a 1D approximation. Geophysics75: WA179–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Mackenzie, M., P.Hilliard, and A.Wynne. 2016. Sandfire resources NL Doolgunna project co-funded government – industry drilling program DAG2014/003266645 final report. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  56. Macnae, J.2017. Advances in electromagnetic data processing: Noise, signal, SPM and AIP. In Proceedings of exploration 17: Sixth decennial International conference on mineral exploration, 191–208. Perth: Exploration Geophysics.
  57. Macnae, J.C., R.Smith, B.D.Polzer, Y.Lamontagne, and P.S.Klinkert. 1991. Conductivity-depth imaging of airborne electromagnetic step-response data. Geophysics56: 102–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Martin, M.2011. Springfield annual exploration report. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  59. McDonald, I.R.1993. Report no. WA94/44P Jillawarra project review report October 1993. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  60. McInerney, P.M., A.J.Mutton, and W.S.Peters. 1994. Abra lead-silver-copper-gold deposit, Western Australia: A geophysical case history. Exploration Geophysics25: 164.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Mueller, T.2011. Final report on drilling of THD001, a 1017.8 m vertical core hole on E52/1673 drilled pursuant to a funding agreement, royalties for regions, co-funded government-industry drilling program 2010/11 application number DAG2010/00000021. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  62. Mukherji, A.2011. Sandfire resources NL Doolgunna project annual report. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  63. Munday, T., Y.Ley Cooper, S.Johnson, and I.Tyler. 2013. A regional scale fixed-wing TDEM survey of the palaeo-proterozoic Bryah Basin, Western Australia: Providing in sights into a geological setting highly prospective for VMS Cu-Au and mesothermal Au systems. ASEG Extended Abstracts2013: 1–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Munday, T., C.Soerensen, D.Marchant, J.Silic, R.Paterson, A.Viezzoli, M.Kunzmann, and S.Spinks. 2018. 1, 2.5 and/or 3D inversion of airborne EM data – options in the search for sediment-hosted base metal mineralisation in the McArthur basin, northern territory. ASEG Extended Abstracts2018: 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Munday, T.J., J.Macnae, J.Bishop, and D.Sattel. 2001. A geological interpretation of observed electrical structures in the regolith: Lawlers, Western Australia. Exploration Geophysics32: 36–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Murphy, J.2011. Mulgul project e52/1455 final report for co-funded drilling DAG2010/00000068 2011. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  67. Murphy, J., E.Turner, and A.Hell. 2009. Combined annual report c 28/2009 P52/1261, P52/1262, P52/1263, E52/2185, E52/1887, E52/1455 and M52/776. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  68. Murphy, J.E.2007. Beyondie project surrender report. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  69. Nabighian, M., and J.Macnae. 1991. 6. Time domain electromagnetic prospecting methods. In Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, ed. M.N.Nabighian, 427–520. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Neroni, R., R.Murray, and D.Kepert. 2016. Application of the airborne electromagnetic method for banded iron-formation mapping in the Hamersley Province, Western Australia. ASEG Extended Abstracts2016: 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Newman, G.A., W.L.Anderson, and G.W.Hohmann. 1987. Interpretation of transient electromagnetic soundings over three-dimensional structures for the central-loop configuration. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society89: 889–914.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Occhipinti, S., R.Hocking, M.Lindsay, A.Aitken, I.Copp, J.Jones, S.Sheppard, F.Pirajno, and V.Metelka. 2017. Paleoproterozoic basin development on the northern Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia. Precambrian Research300: 121–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Palacky, G.J.1981. The airborne electromagnetic method as a tool of geological mapping*. Geophysical Prospecting29: 60–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Parry, D., R.S.Smith, and O.Mahmoodi. 2016. Tools used in mineral exploration for measuring the conductivity and the resistivity in drill holes and on drill core: Observations on their range of sensitivity. Exploration Geophysics47: 315–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Price, A., and D.Hammond. 2006. Partial relinquishment report for Beyondie project E52/1491 for the period 31st August 2001–30th August 2006.
  76. Raiche, A.1998. Modelling the time-domain response of AEM systems. Exploration Geophysics29: 103–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Rasmussen, S., N.Nyboe, S.Mai, and J.Larsen. 2017. Extraction and use of noise models from TEM data. Geophysics83: 1–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Roach, I.2018. Application of AEM for cover thickness mapping in the southern Thomson Orogen. ASEG Extended Abstracts2018: 1–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Roach, I.C., S.Jaireth, and M.T.Costelloe. 2014. Applying regional airborne electromagnetic (AEM) surveying to understand the architecture of sandstone-hosted uranium mineral systems in the Callabonna Sub-basin, Lake Frome region, South Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences61: 659–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Ross, D.2003. Annual report of activities, 12 months ended 30 August 2003, exploration licences E52/1490-1492, E52/1501, E69/1511, E69/1519, Beyondie copper gold project GSWA reference No. C17/2002, M11617 Western Australia. Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  81. Sattel, D.2004. The resolution of shallow horizontal structure with airborne EM, the resolution of shallow horizontal structure with airborne EM. Exploration Geophysics35: 208–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Schamper, C., F.Jørgensen, E.Auken, and F.Effersø. 2014. Assessment of near-surface mapping capabilities by airborne transient electromagnetic data – an extensive comparison to conventional borehole data airborne EM near-surface mapping. Geophysics79: B187–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Shalley, M.J., and T.V.Harvey. 1992. Geophysical responses of the HYC deposit. Exploration Geophysics23: 299–304.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Sheehan, P.2016. E52/1806 and E52/2559 surrender report (both part of Beyondie south (C60/2011) combined reporting group). Department of Mines and Petroleum.
  85. Silverman, B.W.1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
  86. Smith, R.S., G.R.Wood, and B.Powell. 2010. Detection of alteration at the millennium uranium deposit in the Athabasca basin: A comparison of data from two airborne electromagnetic systems with ground resistivity data. Geophysical Prospecting58: 1147–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Spies, B., and F.Frischknecht. 1991. Electromagnetic sounding. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  88. Spies, B.R.1989. Depth of investigation in electromagnetic sounding methods. Geophysics54: 872–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Sugeng, F., and A.Raiche. 1997. Arjun_Air (Australia: Modelling program developed for the sponsors of Australian Minerals Industries Research Association project, P223C.).
  90. Viezzoli, A., V.Kaminski, Y.Cooper, L.Hardy, and G.Fiandaca. 2015. Improving modelling of AEM data affected by IP, two case studies. ASEG extended abstracts 2015: 24th international geophysical conference and exhibition, 1–5. Perth: Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  91. Ward, S., and G.Hohmann. 1988. 4. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. In Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, ed. M.N.Nabighian, 130–311. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Wijns, C.2009. Structural mapping under cover with airborne EM. Preview Section 3: Abstracts2009: 91.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Wolfgram, P., and H.Golden. 2001. Airborne EM applied to sulphide nickel – examples and analysis. Exploration Geophysics32: 136–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Worrall, L., R.Lane, J.Meyers, and A.Whitaker. 2001. Exploring through cover – the integrated interpretation of high resolution aeromagnetic, airborne electromagnetic and ground gravity data from the Grant’s Patch area, Eastern Goldfields Province, Archaean Yilgarn Craton part A: Mapping geology using airborne electromagnetics (TEMPEST). Exploration Geophysics32: 190–3.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1898281
Loading
Extracting meaningful geological and structural features from 1D AEM inversions in conductive terrains
Exploration Geophysics 53, 1 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2021.1898281
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1898281
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1898281
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Airborne electromagnetics; exploration methodologies; forward modelling; interpretation; inversion; Western Australia

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error