1887
Volume 53, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Squirt flow is a wave-induced fluid flow mechanism to account for the velocity dispersion and attenuation of fluid-saturated porous media. Theoretical models of squirt flow cannot deal with complex microcrack-pore networks and thus cannot give accurate dispersion and attenuation curves with respect to frequency. We adopt a numerical oscillatory compressibility test method, based on the quasi-static poroelastic equation of Biot, to model the squirt flow and calculate corresponding P-wave modulus dispersion and attenuation. We also designed nine porous medium models containing different crack-pore configurations and investigated the effects of microcrack porosity, orientation and connectivity on the elastic responses. Modelling results show that not only microcrack porosity but also their orientation has control on the magnitude of the P-wave modulus dispersion and attenuation. Preferentially aligned microcracks may cause frequency-dependent anisotropy in the P-wave modulus and attenuation. Microcrack connectivity has a negligible influence on the dispersion and attenuation magnitude but a large influence on the characteristic frequency of the squirt flow, which is not predicted by theoretical models based on simple representative element volume of crack-pore structure. Therefore, detailed geometry of crack-pore network, of which microcrack porosity, orientation, aspect ratio and connectivity are vital factors, dictates the unique variations in the elastic modulus and associated attenuation with frequency caused by the squirt flow. Pore structure obtained by CT scanning representative of that of the whole rock is needed to obtain more accurate poroelastic responses of the rock with the numerical oscillatory compressibility test method. In this regard, we provide a powerful tool for evaluating dispersion and attenuation of fluid-saturated rock media with complex crack-pore structure, which have potential applications in seismic exploration of hydrocarbon in the subsurface.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1982377
2022-07-04
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adelinet, M., J.Fortin, and Y.Guéguen. 2011. Dispersion of elastic moduli in a porous-cracked rock: Theoretical predictions for squirt flow. Tectonophysics503: 173–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Batzle, M.L., D.H.Han, and R.Hofmann. 2006. Fluid mobility and frequency-dependent seismic velocity-direct measurements. Geophysics71: N1–N9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biot, M.A.1941. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics12: 155–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biot, M.A.1956b. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. II. Higher frequency range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28: 179–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biot, M.A.1962. Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. Journal of Applied Physics33: 1482–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ding, P., D.Wang, G.Di, and X.Li. 2019. Investigation of the effects of fracture orientation and saturation on the Vp/Vs ratio and their implications. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering52 no. 9: 3293–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ding, P., D.Wang, and X.Li. 2020. An experimental study on scale-dependent velocity and anisotropy in fractured media based on artificial rocks with controlled fracture geometries. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering53 no. 7: 3149–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dvorkin, J., G.Mavko, and A.Nur. 1995. Squirt flow in fully saturated rocks. Geophysics60: 97–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fang, C., B.Pan, Y.Wang, Y.Rao, Y.Guo, and J.Li. 2019. Pore-scale fluid distributions determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of partially saturated sandstones. Geophysics84: MR107–MR114.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gist, G.A.1994. Fluid effects on velocity and attenuation in sandstones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America90: 2370–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gurevich, B., D.Makarynska, O.B.de Paula, and M.Pervukhina. 2010. A simple model for squirt-flow dispersion and attenuation in fluid-saturated granular rocks. Geophysics75: 109–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones, T.D.1986. Pore fluids and frequency-dependent wave propagation in rocks. Geophysics51: 1939–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Krief, M., J.Garat, J.Stellingwerff, and J.Ventre. 1990. A petrophysical interpretation using the velocities of P and S waves (full-waveform sonic). Log Analyst31: 355–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, X., S.Greenhalgh, and Y.Wang. 2011. 2.5-D poroelastic wave modelling in double porosity media. Geophysical Journal International186: 1285–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Masson, Y.J., and S.R.Pride. 2007. Poroelastic finite difference modeling of seismic attenuation and dispersion due to mesoscopic-scale heterogeneity. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth112: B03204.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mavko, G., and D.Jizba. 1991. Estimating grain-scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics56: 1940–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mavko, G., and A.Nur. 1975. Melt squirt in the aesthenosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth80: 1444–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mavko, G., and A.Nur. 1979. Wave attenuation in partially saturated rocks. Geophysics44: 161–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mikhaltsevitch, V., M.Lebedev, and B.Gurevich. 2014. A laboratory study of low-frequency wave dispersion and attenuation in water-saturated sandstones. The Leading Edge33: 616–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Müller, T.M., B.Gurevich, and M.Lebedev. 2010. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave-induced flow in porous rocks – a review. Geophysics75 no. 5: 75A147–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Murphy, W.F., K.W.Winkler, and R.L.Kleinberg. 1986. Acoustic relaxation in sedimentary rocks: Dependence on grain contacts and fluid saturation. Geophysics51: 757–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nakagawa, S., and M.Schoenberg. 2007. Poroelastic modeling of seismic boundary conditions across a fracture. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America122: 831–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. O’Connell, R., and B.Budiansky. 1977. Viscoelastic properties of fluid-saturated cracked solids. Journal of Geophysical Research82: 5719–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pimienta, L., J.Borgomano, J.Fortin, and Y.Guéguen. 2017. Elastic dispersion and attenuation in fully saturated sandstones: Role of mineral content, porosity, and pressures. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth122: 9950–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pimienta, L., J.Fortin, and Y.Guéguen. 2015a. Bulk modulus dispersion and attenuation in sandstones. Geophysics80: D111–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pimienta, L., J.Fortin, and Y.Guéguen. 2015b. Experimental study of young’s modulus dispersion and attenuation in fully saturated sandstones. Geophysics80: L57–L72.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pride, S.R., J.G.Berryman, and J.M.Harris. 2003. Seismic attenuation due to wave induced flow. Journal of Geophysical Research109: B1.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Quintal, B., H.Steeb, M.Frehner, and S.M.Schmalholz. 2011. Quasi-static finite element modeling of seismic attenuation and dispersion due to wave-induced fluid flow in poroelastic media. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth116: B01201.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rubino, J.G., L.Guarracino, T.M.Müller, and K.Holliger. 2013. Do seismic waves sense fracture connectivity?Geophysical Research Letters40: 692–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rubino, J.G., L.B.Monachesi, T.M.Müller, L.Guarracino, and K.Holliger. 2013. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion due to wave-induced fluid flow in rocks with strong permeability fluctuations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America134: 4742–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rubino, J.G., C.L.Ravazzoli, and J.E.Santos. 2009. Equivalent viscoelastic solids for heterogeneous fluid-saturated porous rocks. Geophysics74: N1–N13.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rubino, J.G., T.M.Müller, L.Guarracino, M.Milani, and K.Holliger. 2014. Seismoacoustic signatures of fractures connectivity. Journal of Geophysical Research- Solid Earth119: 2252–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Shapiro, S.A.2003. Elastic piezosensitivity of porous and fractured rocks. Geophysics68: 482–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Spencer, J.W., and J.Shine. 2016. Seismic wave attenuation and modulus dispersion in sandstones. Geophysics81: D211–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Subramaniyan, S., B.Quintal, C.Madonna, and E.H.Saenger. 2015. Laboratory-based seismic attenuation in Fontainebleau sandstone: Evidence of squirt flow. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth120: 7526–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tisato, N., and C.Madonna. 2012. Attenuation at low seismic frequencies in partially saturated rocks: Measurements and description of a new apparatus. Journal of Applied Geophysics86: 44–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Toksöz, M.N., C.H.Cheng, and A.Timur. 1976. Velocities of seismic waves in porous rocks. Geophysics41: 621–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Y.2008. Seismic inverse Q filtering. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  39. Wenzlau, F., J.B.Altmann, and T.M.Müller. 2010. Anisotropic dispersion and attenuation due to wave-induced flow: Quasi-static finite-element modeling in poroelastic solids. Journal of Geophysical Research115: B07204.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. White, J.E.1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics40: 224–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yin, H., J.Zhao, G.Tang, L.Zhao, X.Ma, and S.Wang. 2017. Pressure and fluid effect on frequency-dependent elastic moduli in fully saturated tight sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth122: 8925–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, S., F.Yang, D.Xu, and Y.Wang. 2014. Seismic wave simulation by velocity-stress wave equations in two-phase anisotropic media. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering11: 1742–2132.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1982377
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1982377
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attenuation; dispersion; elastic; numerical; Rock physics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error