1887
Volume 53, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Full waveform inversion (FWI) makes full use of the seismic waveforms to find high-resolution velocity and density models by minimising residuals between the calculated and recorded data. attenuation widely exists in the subsurface media, leading to weak amplitude and misplacement of reflectors. However, the commonly used -compensated FWI (FWI) based on the second-order wave equation has difficulties in simultaneously inverting velocity and density fields. A FWI method based on new first-order viscoacoustic quasi-differential equations is proposed to simultaneously produce velocity and density fields. Based on the adjoint state inversion theory, -compensated forward-propagated operators, adjoint operators, and gradient equations are derived using the newly derived first-order viscoacoustic quasi-differential wave equations. The time-domain multi-scale decomposition method is introduced to update the velocity and density models from a low to a high wavenumber. Numerical examples on an actual work area model and a modified attenuating Marmousi model show that the proposed FWI method produces higher-accuracy velocity and density models with iterations by correcting the attenuation than the conventional acoustic FWI. Even when the model is extremely inaccurate, the proposed QFWI obtains acceptable inversion results. Compared to the conventional FWI, our FWI better inverts velocity field in the case of an inaccurate density model. Finally, we verify the adaptability of our FWI to field data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1993059
2022-09-03
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K., and P.G.Richards. 2002. Quantitative seismology. Sausalito, California: University Science Books.
  2. Bai, J., G.Chen, D.Yingst, and J.Leveille. 2013. Attenuation compensation in viscoacoustic reserve-time migration: 83th Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, SEG, 3825-3830. doi:10.1190/segam2013‑1252.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-1252.1
  3. Bamberger, A., G.Chavent, C.Hemon, and P.Lailly. 1982. Inversion of normal incidence seismograms. Geophysics47: 757–770. doi:10.1190/1.1441345.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441345 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boonyasiriwat, C., P.Valasek, P.Routh, W.Cao, G.T.Schuster, and B.Macy. 2009. An efficient multiscale method for time-domain waveform tomography. Geophysics74: WCC59–WCC68. doi:10.1190/1.3151869.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3151869 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bunks, C., F.Saleck, S.Zaleski, and G.Chavent. 1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics60: 1457–1473. doi:10.1190/1.1443880.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443880 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carcione, J.M.2007. Wave fields in real media: Theory and numerical simulation of wave propagation in anisotropic, anelastic, porous and electromagnetic media. Trieste, Italy: Elsevier.
  7. Chen, Y., G.Dutta, W.Dai, and G.Schuster. 2017. Q-least-squares reverse time migration with viscoacoustic deblurring filters. Geophysics82: S425–S438. doi:10.1190/segam2017‑17640582.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17640582.1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dutta, G., and G.T.Schuster. 2014. Attenuation compensation for least-squares reverse time migration using the viscoacoustic-wave equation. Geophysics79: S251–S262. doi:10.1190/geo2013‑0414.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0414.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fichiner, A., H.-P.Bunge, and H.Igel. 1986. The adjoint method in seismology: 1-theory. Geophysics51: 1387–1403. doi:10.1190/1.442188.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.442188 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fletcher, R.P., D.Nichols, and M.Cavalca. 2012. Wavepath-consistent effective Q estimation for Q compensated reserve-time migration: 74th Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts. doi:10.3997/2214‑4609.20.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20
  11. Gauthier, O., J.Virieux, and A.Tarantola. 1986. Two-dimensional nonlinear inversion of seismic waveforms: Numerical results. Geophysics51: 1387–1403. doi:10.1190/1.1442188.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442188 [Google Scholar]
  12. Geller, R.J., and T.Hara. 1993. Two efficient algorithms for iterative linearized inversion of seismic waveform data. Geophysical Journal International115: 699–710. doi:10.1111/j.1365‑246X.1993.tb01488.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1993.tb01488.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeong, W., H.Y.Lee, and D.J.Min. 2012. Full waveform inversion strategy for density in the frequency domain. Geophysical Journal International188: 1221–1242. doi:10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2011.05314.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05314.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Köhn, D., D.D.Nil, A.Kurzmann, and T.Bohlen. 2012. On the influence of model parametrization in elastic full waveform tomography. Geophysical Journal International191: 325–345. doi:10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2012.05633.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05633.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Kolb, P., F.Collino, and P.Lailly. 1986. Pre-stack inversion of a 1-D medium. Proceedings of the IEEE74: 498–508. doi:10.1109/PROC.1986.13490.
    https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1986.13490 [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, D., J.Huang, and Z.Wang. 2020. Convolution-based multi-scale envelope inversion. Petroleum Science17: 352–362. doi:10.1007/s12182‑019‑00419‑8.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-00419-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mora, P.1987. Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multi-offset seismic data. Geophysics52: 1211–1228. doi:10.1190/1.1442384.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442384 [Google Scholar]
  18. Park, E., W.Ha, W.Chung, C.Shin, and D.J.Min. 2013. 2D Laplace-Domain waveform inversion of field data using a power objective function. Pure and Applied Geophysics170: 2075–2085. doi:10.1007/s00024‑013‑0651‑4.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0651-4 [Google Scholar]
  19. Pratt, R.G.1990. Inverse theory applied to multi-source cross-hole tomography II: Elastic wave-equation method. Geophysical Prospecting38: 311–330. doi:10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1990.tb01846.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01846.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Pratt, R.G., and R.M.Shipp. 1999. Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, part 2: Fault delineation in the sediments using crosshole data. Geophysics64: 902–914. doi:10.1190/1.1444597.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444597 [Google Scholar]
  21. Pratt, R.G., and M.H.Worthington. 1990. Inverse theory applied to multi-source cross-hole tomography I: Acoustic wave-equation method. Geophysical Prospecting38: 287–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Qu, Y., and J.Li. 2019. Q-compensated reverse time migration in viscoacoustic media including surface topography. Geophysics84: S201–S217. doi:10.1190/geo2018‑0313.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0313.1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Qu, Y., Z.Li, J.Huang, and J.Li. 2016. Multi-scale full waveform inversion for areas with irregular surface topography in an auxiliary coordinate system. Exploration Geophysics. doi:10.1071/EG16037.
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG16037 [Google Scholar]
  24. Qu, Y., Z.Li, J.Huang, and J.Li. 2017b. Viscoacoustic anisotropic full waveform inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics136: 484–497. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.12.001.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Qu, Y., Z.Li, J.Huang, J.Li, and Z.Guan. 2017a. Elastic full waveform inversion for surface topography. Geophysics82: R269–R285. doi:10.1190/geo2016‑0349.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0349.1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Qu, Y., C.Huang, C.Liu, and Z.Li, 2021. Full-path compensated least-squares reverse time migration of joint primaries and different-order multiples for deep-marine environment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing59: 7109–7121. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3024189
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3024189 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ren, Z., Y.Liu, and Q.Zhang. 2014. Multiscale viscoacoustic waveform inversion with the second generation wavelet transform and adaptive time–space domain finite-difference method. Geophysical Journal International197: 948–974. doi:10.1093/gji/ggu024.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu024 [Google Scholar]
  28. Shin, C.S.1988. Nonlinear elastic wave inversion by blocky parameterization: Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Tulsa.
  29. Shin, C., and Y.H.Cha. 2008. Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain. Geophysical Journal International173: 922–931. doi:10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2008.03768.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03768.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Shin, C., S.Jang, and D.-J.Min. 2001. Improved amplitude preservation for prestack depth migration by inverse scattering theory. Geophysical Prospecting49: 592–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Song, Z.-M., P.R.Williamson, and R.G.Pratt. 1995. Frequency domain acoustic-wave modeling and inversion of crosshole data II inversion method, synthetic experiments and real-data results. Geophysics60: 796–809. doi:10.1190/1.1443818.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443818 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun, J., S.Fomel, and T.Zhu. 2016. Q-compensated least-squares reverse time migration using low-rank one-step wave extrapolation. Geophysics81: S271–S279. doi:10.1190/geo2015‑0520.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0520.1 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tarantola, A.1984. Inversion of seismic refection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics49: 1259–1266. doi:10.1190/1.1441754.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441754 [Google Scholar]
  34. Vigh, D., and E.W.Starr. 2008. 3D prestack plane-wave, full-waveform inversion. Geophysics73: VE135–VE144. doi:10.1190/1.2952623.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2952623 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, B., J.Li, P.Wang, W.Si, and Z.Wang. 2021. Visco-acoustic full waveform inversion using decoupled fractional Laplacian constant-Q wave equation and optimal transport-based misfit function. Exploration Geophysics. doi:10.1080/08123985.2021.1901573.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2021.1901573 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, E., Y.Liu, Y.Ji, T.Chen, and T.Liu. 2019a. Q full-waveform inversion based on the viscoacoustic equation. Applied Geophysics16: 77–91. doi:10.1007/s11770‑019‑0749‑2.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-019-0749-2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, Z., J.Huang, D.Liu, Z.Li, P.Yong, and Z.Yang. 2019b. 3D variable-grid full-waveform inversion on GPU. Petroleum Science16: 1001–1014. doi:10.1007/s12182‑019‑00368‑2.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-00368-2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Xue, Z., J.Sun, S.Fomel, and T.Zhu. 2018. Accelerating full-waveform inversion with attenuation compensation. Geophysics83: A13–A20. doi:10.1190/geo2017‑0469.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0469.1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Yao, G., D.Wu, and S.Wang. 2020. A review on reflection-waveform inversion. Petroleum Science17: 334–351. doi:10.1007/s12182‑020‑00431‑3.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-020-00431-3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Y., P.Zhang, and H.Zhang. 2010. Compensating for visco-acoustic effects in reverse-time migration: 80th Annual International Meeting, SEG Expanded Abstracts, 3160–3164. doi:10.1190/1.3513503.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3513503
  41. Zhu, T., and J.M.Harris. 2014. Modeling acoustic wave propagation in heterogeneous attenuating media using decoupled fractional Laplacians. Geophysics79: T105–T116. doi:10.1190/geo2013‑0245.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0245.1 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhu, T.Z., J.M.Harris, and B.Biondi. 2014. Q-compensated reverse-time migration. Geophysics73: S77–S87. doi:10.1190/geo2013‑0344.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0344.1 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1993059
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2021.1993059
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error