A new implementation of convolutional PML for second-order elastic wave equation

References

1. Appelö, D., and G.Kreiss. 2007. Application of a perfectly matched layer to the nonlinear wave equation. Wave Motion (North-Holland Publishing Company)44: 531–48.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Appelö, D., and N.A.Petersson. 2009. A stable finite difference method for the elastic wave equation on complex geometries with free surfaces. Communications in Computational Physics5: 84–107.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Assi, H., and R.S.Cobbold. 2017. Compact second-order time-domain perfectly matched layer formulation for elastic wave propagation in two dimensions. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids22: 20–37.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bécache, E., S.Fauqueux, and P.Joly. 2003. Stability of perfectly matched layers, group velocities and anisotropic waves. Journal of Computational Physics188: 399–433.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bérenger, J.-P.1994. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. Journal of Computational Physics114: 185–200.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chew, W.C., and Q.H.Liu. 1996. Perfectly matched layers for elastodynamics: A new absorbing boundary condition. Journal of Computational Acoustics4: 341–59.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Collino, F., and C.Tsogka. 2001. Application of the perfectly matched absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media. Geophysics66: 294–307.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Drossaert, F.H., and A.Giannopoulos. 2007. Complex frequency shifted convolution PML for FDTD modelling of elastic waves. Wave Motion (North-Holland Publishing Company)44: 593–604.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Duru, K., and G.Kreiss. 2012. A well-posed and discretely stable perfectly matched layer for elastic wave equations in second order formulation. Communications in Computational Physics11: 1643–72.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fletcher, R.P., X.Du, and P.J.Fowler. 2009. Reverse time migration in tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media. Geophysics74: WCA179–87.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grote, M.J., and I.Sim. 2010. Efficient PML for the wave equation. http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0319v1.
12. Hastings, F.D., J.B.Schneider, and S.L.Broschat. 1996. Application of the perfectly matched layer (PML) absorbing boundary condition to elastic wave propagation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America100: 3061–9.
    [Google Scholar]
13. He, Y.B., T.N.Chen, and J.H.Gao. 2020. Perfectly matched absorbing layer for modelling transient wave propagation in heterogeneous poroelastic media. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering17: 18–34.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Komatitsch, D., and R.Martin. 2007. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics72: SM155–SM167.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Komatitsch, D., and J.Tromp. 2003. A perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition for the second-order seismic wave equation. Geophysical Journal International154: 146–53.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kuzuoglu, M., and R.Mittra. 1996. Frequency dependence of the constitutive parameters of causal perfectly matched anisotropic absorbers. IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters6: 447–9.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Levander, A.R.1988. Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics53: 1425–36.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Li, Y., and O.Bou Matar. 2010. Convolutional perfectly matched layer for elastic second-order wave equation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America127: 1318–27.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Liu, Y., and M.K.Sen. 2009. A new time-space domain high-order finite-difference method for the acoustic wave equation. Journal of Computational Physics228: 8779–806.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Marcinkovich, C., and K.Olsen. 2003. On the implementation of perfectly matched layers in a three-dimensional fourth-order velocity-stress finite difference scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth108: 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Martin, R., and D.Komatitsch. 2009. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer technique improved at grazing incidence for the viscoelastic wave equation. Geophysical Journal International179: 333–44.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Martin, R., D.Komatitsch, and A.Ezziani. 2008. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for seismic wave propagation in poroelastic media. Geophysics73: T51–61.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nilsson, S., N.A.Petersson, B.Sjögreen, and H.O.Kreiss. 2007. Stable difference approximations for the elastic wave equation in second order formulation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis45: 1902–36.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pasalic, D., and R.McGarry. 2010. Convolutional perfectly matched layer for isotropic and anisotropic acoustic wave equations. Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 80th annual meeting 2010, SEG 2010, 2925–9.
25. Petersson, N.A., and B.Sjögreen. 2012. Stable and efficient modeling of anelastic attenuation in seismic wave propagation. Communications in Computational Physics12: 193–225.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Roden, J.A., and S.D.Gedney. 2000. Convolution PML (CPML): An efficient FDTD implementation of the CFS-PML for arbitrary media. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters27: 334–9.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Saenger, E.H., N.Gold, and S.A.Shapiro. 2000. Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid. Wave Motion (North-Holland Publishing Company)31: 77–92.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Sjögreen, B., and N.A.Petersson. 2012. A fourth order accurate finite difference scheme for the elastic wave equation in second order formulation. Journal of Scientific Computing52: 17–48.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Virieux, J.1984. SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity- stress finite-difference method. Geophysics49: 1933–42.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Virieux, J.1986. P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity- stress finite-difference method. Geophysics51: 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Wang, Y., W.Liang, Z.Nashed, X.Li, G.Liang, and C.Yang. 2014. Seismic modeling by optimizing regularized staggered-grid finite-difference operators using a time-space-domain dispersion-relationship-preserving method. Geophysics79: T277–T285.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Yao, G., N.V.Da Silva, and D.Wu. 2018. An effective absorbing layer for the boundary condition in acoustic seismic wave simulation. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering15: 495–511.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Zeng, Y.Q., and Q.H.Liu. 2001. A staggered-grid finite-difference method with perfectly matched layers for poroelastic wave equations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America109: 2571–80.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Zhang, W., and Y.Shen. 2010. Unsplit complex frequency-shifted PML implementation using auxiliary differential equations for seismic wave modeling. Geophysics79: T141–T154.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Zou, Q., J.P.Huang, P.Yong, and Z.C.Li. 2020. 3D elastic waveform modeling with an optimized equivalent staggered-grid finite-difference method. Petroleum Science17: 967–89.
    [Google Scholar]