1887
Volume 54, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The author proposes a new approach for analysing datasets of the differential curvature of a gravity-gradient tensor for density evaluation of the surface layer without a prior density assumption. The method, called the horizontal gravity-gradient stack–moving window correlation (HGGS-MWC) method, is based on a successive MWCs between the acquired data and the data of differential curvature responses of the surface layer calculated based on a digital elevation model. For improving the correlation, a HGGS processing method was devised and patented. It is applied to both datasets before the MWC processing. A point-source differential curvature response has the characteristic of forming a peculiar and symmetrical shape of a quadrant and distributing peaks and troughs over an underlying anomalous mass. These peaks and troughs are near or far away from their centre depending on the depth of the anomalous mass. This enables one to design a filter to enhance the responses of the surface layer. In addition, the HGGS processing affects both the contraction of the gravitational response and the attenuation of responses from deeper subsurface layers. The HGGS-MWC method leads to the production of values of the mass surface roughness ratio () in the wavenumber domain that are inherent to the measuring plane of surveys and determines the phase relation between the mass of the surface layer and the surface roughness. The is a good indicator of whether a mass surplus or deficit relative to the regional average mass exists under a convex surface layer. Application to the observed datasets was performed in the area where serious landslides were triggered by the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi inland earthquake. Based on a flight height of 150 m, the mass variations of the surface layer, which is down to 300 m below the surface, are properly evaluated by analysing the wavelengths in the data mainly within the range of 270–650 m and perceivably up to 1,650 m. The specific areas can be delineated where low-density deposits, such as possible volcanic ashes and pumices associated with high water content, sit on high mountains with steep slopes. The information is useful for disaster prevention by playing a role in selecting potential areas for conducting further precise surveys. Regional density variations whose wavelengths are longer than 1,650 m remain unsolved and are an issue for future studies. With the issue solved, the results for the density distribution of the surface layer obtained by the HGGS-MWC method will serve for terrain corrections of the vertical gravity-gradient data and gravity data as well.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2067474
2023-01-02
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnes, G., and J.Lumley. 2011. Processing gravity-gradient data. Geophysics76: 133–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandler, V.W., J.S.Koski, W.J.Hinze, and L.W.Braile. 1981. Analysis of multi-source gravity and magnetic anomaly data sets by moving-window application of Poisson’s theorem. Geophysics46: 30–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiba, A., and C.Cevallos. 2016. Introduction of airborne gravity-gradient survey to Japan. BUTURI-TANSA (Geophysical Exploration)69: 5–17 (in Japanese with English abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CODATA. 2018. Newtonian constant of gravitation, Committee on Data for Science and Technology.
  5. Dransfield, M.2010a. Conforming FALCON gravity and global gravity anomaly. Geophysical Prospecting58: 469–483.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dransfield, M.2010b. Requirements for airborne gravity-gradient terrain corrections, ASEG 2010, Sydney, Australia.
  7. Fujimoto, H., and Y.Tomoda. 2000. The earth observed from gravity. Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo Press (in Japanese).
  8. Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ). 1988. Shinjo and Sakata, NJ-54-20-26, Geological map of Japan 1:200,000, edited by Ozawa, A., in 1987.
  9. Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ). 2020. Seamless digital geological map of Japan 1:200,000, V2, April 6, 2020 version, GSJ, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology.
  10. Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI). 2015. Foundation Map Download Service, Numerical Elevation Model, 10 m mesh (in Japanese).
  11. Golden Software. 2002. Surfer 8 user’s guide, contouring and 3D surface mapping for scientists and engineers. Golden, CO: Golden Software, Inc.
  12. Grauch, V.J.S.1987. A new variable-magnetizationterrain correction method for aeromagnetic data, Geophysics52:94–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heiland, C.A.1968. Geophysical exploration. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.
  14. Ishihara, T.1987. Gravimetric determination of densities of seamounts along Bonin Arc – seamounts, islands, and atolls, Keating, B. H., et al., eds., Geophysical Monograph Series, 43, 97–113.
  15. JOGMEC and CGG. 2014. HeliFALCONTM Airborne Gravity Gradiometer Survey, Kujyu and Kirishima, Kyushu Japan, Project Number: J02398, Logistics and Processing Report, CGG Aviation (Australia) Pty Ltd, 67p.
  16. JOGMEC and Fugro Japan. 2015. The fiscal year 2015 airborne geophysical survey for the geothermal resources potential report (in Japanese).
  17. JOGMEC and JSEG. 2015. Report to outsourcing to JSEG, Study of methods for utilization of airborne gravity survey data to assessments of geothermal resources (in Japanese).
  18. Lane, R.J.L.2004. Integrating ground and airborne data into regional gravity compilation. Airborne Gravity, 81–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mizutani, S.2018. The expectation of the analysis and interpretation of the gravity-gradient data for the geothermal resources assessment, The application of the horizontal gravity-gradient stack (HGGS) for the estimation of the surface-layer density and its correction to the gravity-gradient data, and the comparison with the geological interpretation of the seismic data. Journal of the Geothermal Research Society of Japan40 no. 1: 45–75 (in Japanese with English abstract and figure captions).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mizutani, S.2019. The method for estimating surface density value in gravity gradiometry data, JP 6468606, 2019-02-13.
  21. Parker, R.I.1973. The rapid calculation of potential anomalies. Geophysical Journal International31 no. 4: 447–455.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. USGS. 2008. Shape map, United States Geological Survey.
  23. Water and Disaster Management Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (WDB-MLIT). 2008. Occurrence of sediment-related disasters in 2008, Report of water and disaster.
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2067474
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2067474
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error