1887
Volume 54, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Electrochemical reactions at the interface between groundwater and sulphides are remarkable. Sulphides in mineralised zones are relatively abundant compared to hydrothermal alteration zones and host rocks. Complex resistivity is a geophysical tool for visualising difference between various subsurface electrochemical reactions. The epithermal Au–Ag mineralisation at Moisan hill (South Korea) occurs in the extensively disseminated pyrite zone, a typical feature of advanced argillic and argillic alteration zones. The epithermal vein at Moisan had a strike length of >500 m horizontally and approximately 300 m vertically and was controlled by the WNW fault zone. In this context, the deposit was subjected to a test bed to demonstrate the applicability of the complex resistivity survey for mineral exploration. To compare complex resistivity results with geological characteristics of epithermal mineralisation, we visualised the complex resistivity survey results and Au–Ag mineralised zones confirmed by drilling cores in three dimensions. The quartz veins of the targets showed high resistivity and a strong phase response; however, both the alteration zones and host rocks showed lower resistivity and a weaker phase response than the target zones. Through a step-by-step clustering analysis, a simple map integrating both kinds of the geophysical models was generated, to identify the boundary between the target and background. Geologic survey and drilling investigations indicate that the target is well-localised in a mineralised zone. The complex resistivity survey is a useful tool for exploring epithermal Au–Ag deposits.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2091986
2023-03-04
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arndt, N.T., L.Fontboté, J.Hedenquist, S.Kesler, J.F.H.Thompson, and D.G.Wood. 2017. Future global mineral resources. Geochemical Perspectives6, no. 1: 1–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bérubé, C.L., G.R.Olivo, M.Chouteau, and S.Perrouty. 2019. Mineralogical and textural controls on spectral induced polarization signatures of the Canadian malartic gold deposit: Applications to mineral exploration. Geophysics84: B135–B151.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bleil, D.1953. Induced polarization: A method of geophysical prospecting. Geophysics18: 636–661.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowden, C. D.2007. Epithermal systems of the Seongsan District, South Korea an investigation on the geological setting and spatial and temporal relationships between high and low sulfidation systems. PhD thesis. James Cook University.
  5. Commer, M., G.A.Newman, K.H.Williams, and S.S.Hubbard. 2011. 3d induced-polarization data inversion for complex resistivity. Geophysics76: F157–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Duda, R.O., P.E.Hart, and D.G.Stork. 2000. Pattern classification. 2nd Edition. Wiley-Interscience.
  7. Emerson, D.W.1986. Physical properties of skarns. Exploration Geophysics17: 201–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Günther, T., C.Rücker, and K.Spitzer. 2006. Three-dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – II. Inversion. Geophysical Journal International166: 506–517.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hedenquist, J.W., R.A.Arribas, E.Gonzalez-Urien, S.G.Hagemann, and P.E.Brown. 2000. Exploration for epithermal gold deposits. Reviews in Economic Geology13: 45–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lysdahl, A.K., S.Bazin, C.Christensen, S.Ahrens, T.Günther, and A.A.Pfaffhuber. 2017. Comparison between 2D and 3D ERT inversion for engineering site investigations – a case study from Oslo Harbour. Near Surface Geophysics15: 201–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Macdonald, J.R., and W.B.Johnson. 2005. Fundamentals of impedance spectroscopy. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  12. Pedregosa, F., G.Varoquaux, A.Gramfort, V.Michel, B.Thirion, O.Grisel, M.Blondel, P.Prettenhofer, R.Weiss, and V.Dubourg. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research12: 2825–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pelton, W., S.Ward, P.Hallof, W.Sill, and P.Nelson. 1978. Mineral discrimination and removal of inductive coupling with multifrequency IP. Geophysics43: 588–609.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Shin, S.W., S.G.Park, and D.B.Shin. 2015. Spectral-induced polarization characteristics of rock types from the skarn deposit in Gagok Mine, Taebaeksan Basin, South Korea. Environmental Earth Sciences73: 8325–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sillitoe, R.H.1995. Exploration and discovery of base-and precious-metal deposits in the circum-pacific region-a late 1990s update. Society of Resource Geology.
  16. Simmons, S.F., N.C.White, D.A.John, J.W.Hedenquist, J.F.H.Thompson, R.J.Goldfarb, and J.P.Richards. 2005. Geological characteristics of epithermal precious and base metal deposits. In One Hundredth Anniversary Volume, Economic geology.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Son, J.-S., S.Y.Song, and M.J.Nam. 2020. Complex resistivity survey for the evaluation of ground reinforcement in a karst area. Engineering Geology269: 105555.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Šumi, F.1961. The induced polarization method in ore investigation. Geophysical Prospecting9: 459–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Telford, W. M., L. P.Geldart, and R. E.Sheriff. 1990. Applied geophysics. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Zonge, K., and J.Wynn. 1975. Recent advances and applications in complex resistivity measurements. Geophysics40: 851–864.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2091986
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2091986
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): clustering analysis; Complex resistivity; epithermal deposits; mineral exploration

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error