1887
Volume 54, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The weak signals of artificial seismic records contain the subsurface medium information that is required in the inversion. But in the full waveform inversion (FWI), the weak signals contribute less to the objective functions. Therefore, how to improve the contribution of the weak signals in the objective functions of FWI is the problem that needs to be solved urgently. The research shows (Ren, D. 1980. Preliminary research on seismic record and instantaneous frequency. 15 no. 1: 7–21) that instantaneous frequency attributes, which are very sensitive to the changes in subsurface velocity, have the potential to extract the weak signals from the seismic records. However, this frequency can only be estimated from the complex seismic signals. Empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method has been widely used in signal analysis so as to estimate the instantaneous frequency, but it is difficult to be applied in FWI due to the huge computation. In order to solve this problem, the instantaneous frequency is replaced with the first-order approximation of the exponential frequency in FWI. In this paper, the objective functions of the first-order approximate exponential frequency FWI (FRE-EFWI) in elastic waves and the source terms of its back propagation formula were derived. Besides, the FRE-EFWI method was proved to improve the contribution of the weak signals in the objective functions of FWI. In addition, the correctness and effectiveness of the method were demonstrated by the examples of FWI.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2092725
2023-03-04
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alkhalifah, T.2015. Scattering-angle based filtering of the waveform inversion gradients. Geophysical Journal International200: 363–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bozdağ, E., J.Trampert, and J.Tromp. 2011. Misfit functions for full waveform inversion based on instantaneous phase and envelope measurements. Geophysical Journal International185 no. 2: 845–870.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, G.X., W.C.Yang, S.C.Chen, Y.N.Liu, and Z.W.Gu. 2020. Application of envelope in salt structure velocity building: from objective function construction to the full-band seismic data reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing58 no. 9: 6594–6608.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, G.X., W.C.Yang, Y.Liu, H.Wang, and X.Huang. 2022. Salt structure elastic full waveform inversion based on the multi-scale signed envelope. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60 no. 12: 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, Q.1979. Hilbert transform and envelope, instantaneous phase and instantaneous frequency of signals. Oil Geophysical Prospecting14 no. 3: 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, Y., and T.Alkhalifah. 2013. Frequency-domain waveform inversion using the phase derivative. Geophysical Journal International195 no. 3: 1904–1916.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong, L., B.Chi, and J.Tao. 2013. Misfit function behavior in acoustic full-waveform inversion. Chinese Journal of Geophysics56 no. 10: 3445–3460.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, S., Z.Ren, and Z.Li. 2019. Multi-source elastic full waveform inversion based on P-wave and S-wave separation. Oil Geophysical Prospecting54 no. 5: 1084–1093.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kosloff, D., and E.Baysal. 1982. Forward modeling by a Fourier method. Geophysics47 no. 10: 1402–1412.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, Z., B.Gu, X.Ma, and G.Liang. 2015a. Separating P-and S-waves in pre-stack elastic seismograms using the equivalent form of elastic wave equation. Journal of Applied Geophysics114: 210–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Z., X.Ma, C.Fu, B.Gu, and G.Liang. 2015b. Frequency-wavenumber implementation for P-and S-wave separation from multi-component seismic data. Exploration Geophysics47 no. 1: 32–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, Z., H.Zhang, and Q.Liu. 2007. Multi-source elastic full waveform inversion based on P-wave and S-wave separation. Oil Geophysical Prospecting42 no. 5: 510–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Luo, J., R.Wu, and J.Gao. 2016. Local minima reduction of seismic envelope inversion. Chinese Journal of Geophysics59 no. 7: 2510–2518.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Luo, J., R.Wu, and F.Gao. 2018a. Time domain full waveform inversion using instantaneous phase with damping. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering15: 1032–1041.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Luo, J., R.Wu, and F.Gao. 2018b. Time domain full waveform inversion using instantaneous phase with damping. SEG Technical Program Expended Abstracts37: 1472–1476.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pratt, R.1990. Frequency-domain elastic wave modeling by finite differences: A tool for cross-hole seismic imaging. Geophysics55 no. 5: 626–632.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Raknes, E. B., and B.Arntsen. 2014. Strategies for Elastic Full Waveform Inversion. Seg Technical Program Expanded Abstracts12: 1222–1226.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ren, D.1980. Preliminary research on seismic record and instantaneous frequency. Oil Geophysical Prospecting15 no. 1: 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Shah, N. K., M. R.Warner, J. K.Washbourne, and L. U.Guasch. 2012. A phase-unwrapped solution for overcoming a poor starting model in full-wavefield inversion 74th Annual Int. Conf. and Exhibition, EAGE Extended Abstracts14: 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tarantola, A.1987. Inverse problem theory: Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. New York: Elsevier Science Publ. Co., Inc.
  21. Wu, R., J.Luo, and B.Wu. 2014. Seismic envelope inversion and modulation signal model. Geophysics79 no. 10: WA13–WA24.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu, Y., Z.Ren, and Z.Li. 2020. Full waveform inversion of time domain acoustic wave based on first order approximate instantaneous frequency. Oil Geophysical Prospecting55 no. 5: 1029–1038.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhong, Y., S.Qin, and B.Tang. 2002. Theoretical research on hilbert-Huang transformation. Journal of Vibration and Shock12 no. 4: 15–19.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2092725
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2092725
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error