1887
Volume 54, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The reconstruction of data is a critical preliminary work in the seismic data processing. Compressed sensing (CS) has been well applied in the field of reconstruction. The key point of CS is random sampling, which converts the mutual interference alias caused by regular undersampling into lower-amplitude outside noise. But traditional sampling methods lack constraints on sampling points, emerging too much alias. Segmented random sampling (SRS) effectively controls the distance between sampling points. On the other hand, a single mathematical transformation will lead to incomplete sparse expression and bad restoration effects. Morphological component analysis (MCA) decomposes a signal into several components with outstanding morphological features to approximate the complex internal structure of data. In this paper, we found a new dictionary combination (shearlet + DCT) under the MCA framework and used the block coordinate relaxation algorithm to get the optimal solution to obtain reconstruction results. Tests of 2D data and 3D data have proved that the proposed method can get a better effect when reconstructing the SRS data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2111995
2023-03-04
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hennenfent, G., and F.J.Herrmann. 2008. Simply denoise: Wavefield reconstruction via jittered undersampling. Geophysics73, no. 3: V19–V28.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jiang, P., K.Zhang, Y.K.Zhang, and X.Tian. 2019. Noisy seismic data reconstruction method based on morphological component analysis framework. Progress in Geophysics34, no. 2: 573–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Leneman, O.1966. Random sampling of random processes: Impulse response. Information and Control9, no. 2: 347–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, H., G.Wu, and X.Yin. 2012. Morphological component analysis in seismic data reconstruction. Oil Geophysical Prospecting47, no. 2: 236–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, C., D.Wang, and T.Wang. 2014. Random seismic noise attenuation based on the shearlet transform. Acta Petrolei Sinica35, no. 04: 692–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mosher, C.C.2012. Generalized windowed transforms for seismic processing and imaging. In 82nd Annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts.
  7. Mosher, C.C., S.T.Kaplan, and F.D.Janiszewski. 2012. Non-uniform optimal sampling for seismic survey design. In 74th Annual international conference and exhibition, EAGE, extended abstracts.
  8. Mosher, C.C., E.Keskula, S.T.Kaplan, R.G.Keys, C.Li, E.Z.Ata, L.C.Morley, et al.2012. Compressive seismic imaging. In 82nd Annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts.
  9. Sardy, S., G.Bruce A, and P.Tseng. 2000. Block coordinate relaxation methods for nonparametric wavelet denoising. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics9, no. 2: 361–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tang, G.2010. Seismic data reconstruction and denoising based on compressive sensing and sparse representation. PhD thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing (in Chinese).
  11. Yang, P., and S.Fomel. 2015. Seislet-based morphological component analysis using scale-dependent exponential shrinkage. Journal of Applied Geophysics118: 66–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang, J., Y.D.Ni, X.F.Zou, Y.J.Lan, and M.J.Yu. 2018. A new random sampling method based on compressed sensing. In 80th Annual international conference and exhibition, EAGE, extended abstracts.
  13. Zhang, L., L.Han, D.Xu, Y.Li, and H.Li. 2017. Seismic data reconstruction with shearlet transform based on compressed sensing technology. Oil Geophysical Prospecting52, no. 2: 220–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, K., Y.Zhang, Z.Li, X.Tian, Y.Ouyang, and J.Chen. 2019. Seismic data reconstruction method combined with discrete cosine transform and shearlet dictionary under morphological component analysis framework. OGP54, no. 5: 1005–13 + 1056 + 940–1.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou, Y., Z.Liu, and Z.Zhang. 2015. Seismic signal reconstruction under the morphological component analysis framework combined with discrete cosine transform (DCT) and curvelet dictionary. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum54, no. 5: 560–8.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2111995
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2022.2111995
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error