A processing for ocean-bottom multicomponent data with seismic interferometry: a case study of southern offshore in Korea

References

1. Bakulin, A., and R.Calvert. 2006. The virtual source method: Theory and case study. Geophysics71, no. 4: SI139–50.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barkved, O., B.Bartman, B.Compani, J.Gaiser, R.V.Dok, T.Johns, P.Kristiansen, T.Probert, and M.Thompson. 2004. The many facets of multicomponent seismic data. Oilfield Review16: 42–56.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barr, F.J., and J.I.Sanders. 1989. Attenuation of water-column reverberations using pressure and velocity detectors in a water-bottom cable. 59th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, Dallas, 653–6.
4. Brunellière, J., P.Caprioli, S.Grion, D.Tilling, L.Amundsen, and H.Aronsen. 2004. Surface multiple attenuation by up-down wavefield deconvolution: An OBC case study. 74th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, Denver, 849–52.
5. Choi, H., S.J.Seol, and J.Byun. 2017. Converted-wave guided imaging condition for elastic reverse time migration with wavefield separation. Exploration Geophysics48, no. 3: 201–9.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gaiser, J.E., and I.Vasconcelos. 2010. Elastic interferometry for ocean-bottom cable data: Theory and examples. Geophysical Prospecting58, no. 3: 347–60.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Haines, S.S.2011. PP and PS interferometric images of near-seafloor sediments. 81st annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, San Antonio, 1288–92 .
8. Ikelle, L.T., and L.Amundsen. 2005. Introduction to petroleum seismology, 273–87. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
9. Loewenthal, D., S.S.Lee, and G.H.F.Gardner. 1985. Deterministic estimation of a wavelet using impedance type technique. Geophysical Prospecting33, no. 7: 956–69.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Mehta, K., A.Bakulin, J.Sheiman, R.Calvert, and R.Snieder. 2007. Improving the virtual source method by wavefield separation. Geophysics72, no. 4: V79–86.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mjelde, R.2003. Ocean-bottom seismic. Business Briefing: Exploration & Production2003: 1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ogagarue, D.O., and J.O.Ebeniro. 2015. An improved dual sensor summation method with application to four-component (4-C) seafloor seismic data from the niger delta. Earth Science Research4, no. 2: 64.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Schalkwijk, K.M., C.P.A.Wapenaar, and D.J.Verschuur. 1999. Application of two step decomposition to multicomponent ocean-bottom data: theory and case study. Journal of Seismic Exploration8: 261–78.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Singh, V., and S.Gautam. 1998. Developments in offshore data acquisition technology: An overview. Geohorizons3 no. 2: 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Soubaras, R.1996. Ocean-bottom hydrophone and geophone processing. 66th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, Denver, 24–7 .
16. Wang, Y., and S.Grion. 2008. PZ calibration in shallow waters: The Britannia OBS example. In 78th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, Las Vegas, 1088–92.
17. Wang, Y., S.Grion, and R.Bale. 2009. What comes up must have gone down: The principle and application of up-down deconvolution for multiple attenuation of ocean-bottom data. CSEG Recorder34, no. 10: 10–16.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Wapenaar, K., D.Draganov, R.Snieder, X.Campman, and A.Verdel. 2010. Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1 basic principles and applications. Geophysics75, no. 5: 75A195–209.
    [Google Scholar]