1887
High resolution geophysics and non-destructive testing for archaeology and monumental heritage
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

To better understand the location and help in the conservation of buried structures in the ancient site of Tusculum, in Central Italy, archaeological and multi-methodological geophysical studies were developed in the recent last years. These studies included geophysical surveys, which were combined with topographical survey and direct archaeological excavations. Tusculum is one of the largest Roman archaeological sites in the Alban Hills, located in the Latium region (Italy), about 25 km South-East of Rome. This settlement was inhabited since pre-Roman times, up to the middle ages. The objective of the Tusculum Project is to verify the town-planning of and to obtain information about the location, shape, depth and size of the hypothesised buried buildings. With these aims, multi-methodological geophysical surveys have been carried out in the time range 2016–2019 to locate the archaeological remains in different portions of the studied area and to verify the orientation of the underground aqueduct system. GPR and gradiometric surveys were carried out to investigate the archaeological remains, while ERT surveys, were employed to find evidence of undiscovered parts of the underground aqueduct system. These results, along with geological studies and historic evidence, are being examined by archaeologist to understand the limits of the town and how water was supplied to such a large, populated settlement. The obtained results show very good correspondence between the buried architecture, the geophysical anomalies and the archaeological excavations. A number of unexpected buried buildings were discovered, which were excavated in 2017 and 2018, which showed remains of buried public thermal bath and a large church with surrounding funerary area built in the Middle Ages.

© 2023 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2210155
2024-01-02
2026-01-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2210155
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aquilué, X., and A.Quevedo. 2021. Tusculum VI. La fuente arcaica de Tusculum. Intervenciones arqueológicas de los años 1996–2000. Serie arqueológica – 16, Madrid.
  2. Arato, A., S.Piro, and L.Sambuelli. 2015. 3D inversion of ERT data on an archaeological site using GPR reflection and 3D inverted magnetic data as a priori information. SI “Integrated Geophysical Investigation for Archaeology”. Near Surface Geophysics13, no. 6: 545–556. doi:10.3997/1873‑0604.2015046.
     https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2015046 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aspinall, A., C.Gaffney, and A.Schmidt. 2008. Magnetometry for archaeologists. London, MD: AltaMira Press.
  4. Becker, H.1995. From nanotesla to picotesla — a new window for magnetic prospecting in archaeology. Archaeological Prospection2: 217–228.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Beolchini, V.2006. Tusculum II. Tuscolo. Una roccaforte dinastica a controllo della Valle Latina. Fonti storiche e dati archeologici. Bibliotheca Italica. Monografías de la Escuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma, 29. Roma.
  6. Beolchini, V.2018. Multidisciplinary approach in Archaeological research: Tusculum case study. In Preserving, managing and enhancing the archaeological sites: Comparative perspective between China and Italy, eds. L.Genovese, H.Yan, and A.Quattrocchi, 29–38. Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR Edizioni. ISBN 978 88 8080 291 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beolchini, V., P.Diarte-Blasco, and S.Piro. 2018. Nuove prospettive del progetto Tusculum: un approccio multidisciplinare alla ricerca archeologica. In Proceedings of VIII National Conference “Archeologia Medievale”, 144–148. All’Insegna del Giglio, Vol. 2. Florence, Italy. ISBN 978-88-7814-867-3.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Beolchini, V., F.Galli, and A.Pizzo. 2023. Le terme di Tusculum (Monte Porzio Catone): dallo scavo archeologico al progetto di restauro e valorizzazione. Proceedings of XIII National Conference “Lazio e Sabina”, Serie Seconda (25–27 maggio 2022), Roma.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cammarano, F., P.Mauriello, D.Patella, S.Piro, F.Rosso, and L.Versino. 1998. Integration of high resolution geophysical methods. Detection of shallow depth bodies of archaeological interest. Annali di Geofisica41, no. 3: 359–368.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Campana, S., M.Dabas, L.Marasco, S.Piro, and D.Zamuner. 2009. Integration of remote sensing, geophysical surveys and archaeological excavation for the study of a medieval mound (Tuscany, Italy). Archaeological Prospection16, no. 3: 167–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Campana, S., and S.Piro. 2009. Seeing the unseen. Geophysics and landscape archaeology. Ed. S.Campana and S.Piro. Oxon: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, ISBN 978-0-415-44721-8.7.
  12. Capulli, R.2008. I cuniculi del Monte Tuscolo (Roma-Lazio). Atti VI convegno nazionale di speleologia in cavità artificiali; Opera Ipogea 1, 2.
  13. Ciminale, M., H.Becker, and D.Gallo. 2007. Integrated technologies for archaeological investigation; the Celone Valley project. Archaeological Prospection14: 167–181.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dabas, M., and A.Tabbagh. 2000. Magnetic prospecting. Archaeological method and theory: An encyclopedia, 335–339.
  15. De Giorgi, L., and G.Leucci. 2018. Passive and active electrical methods: New frontiers and applications. In Innovation in near surface geophysics. Instrumentation, application and data processing methods, eds. R.Persico, S.Piro, and N.Linford, 1–21. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN: 978-0-12-812429-1.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Deiana, R., G.Leucci, and R.Martorana. 2018. New perspectives on geophysics for archaeology. A special issue. Surveys in Geophysics13, no. 3: 243–252.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Diarte-Blasco, P., M.Pérez-Polo, V.Beolchini, and A.Pizzo. 2019. Tusculum (Frascati, RM). Le terme pubbliche. In Le Terme Pubbliche nell’Italia Romana (II secolo a.C. – fine IV d.C.): architettura, tecnologia e società, Seminario Internazionale di Studio (Roma, 4-5 ottobre 2018), Roma 2019, 445–455.
  18. Fassbinder, J.W.E.2015. Seeing beneath the farmland, steppe and desert soil: Magnetic prospecting and soil magnetism. Journal of Archaeological Science56: 85–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaffney, C., and V.Gaffney. 2000. Non-invasive investigations at Wroxeter at the end of the twentieth century. Archaeological Prospection7, no. 2: 65–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gaffney, V., H.Patterson, S.Piro, D.Goodman, and Y.Nishimura. 2004. Multimethodological approach to study and characterize Forum Novum (Vescovio, central Italy). Archaeological Prospection11: 201–212.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Giordano, G., A.De Benedetti, A.Diana, G.Diano, F.Gaudioso, F.Marasco, M.Miceli, S.Mollo, and R.Funiciello. 2006. The Colli Albani mafic caldera (Roma, Italy): Stratigraphy, structure and petrology. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research155: 49–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Goodman, D., and S.Piro. 2013. GPR remote sensing in archaeology. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-31856-6, ISBN 978-3-642-31857-3 (eBook). doi:10.1007/978‑3‑642‑31857‑3.
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31857-3
  23. Goodman, D., K.Schneider, S.Piro, Y.Nishimura, and A.G.Pantel. 2006. Ground penetrating radar advances in subsurfaces imaging for archaeology. In Remote sensing in archaeology, eds. J.Wiseman, and F.El-Baz, 375–394, Chapter 15.New York: Springer,.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kvamme, K.L.2006. Integrating multidimensional geophysical data. Archaeological Prospection13: 57–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Leucci, G.2006. Contribution of ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography to identify the cavity and fractures under the main church in Botrugno (Lecce, Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science33, no. 9: 1194–1204.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Leucci, G., M.Parise, M.Sammarco, and G.Scardozzi. 2016. The Use of geophysical prospections to Map ancient hydraulic works: The Triglio underground aqueduct (Apulia, southern Italy). Archaeological Prospection23, no. 3: 195–211.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Linford, N., P.Linford, L.Martin, and A.Payne. 2007. Recent results from the English Heritage Caesium Magnetometer system in comparison with recent Fluxgate gradiometers. Archaeological Prospection14: 151–166.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Loke, M.H., I.Acworth, and T.Dahlin. 2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2-D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics34: 182–187.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Loke, M.H., and R.D.Barker. 1996. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method1. Geophysical Prospecting44: 131–152.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Neubauer, W., A.Eder-Hinterleitner, S.Seren, and P.Melichar. 2002. Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria: An approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection9: 135–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Papadopoulos, N.G., P.Tsourlos, G.N.Tsokas, and A.Sarris. 2006. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional resistivity imaging in archaeological site investigation. Archaeological Prospection13: 163–181.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Persico, R., S.Piro, and N.Linford. 2018. Innovation in near surface geophysics. Instrumentation, application and data processing methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1–505, ISBN: 978-0-12-812429-1.
  33. Pettinelli, E.2013. Note preliminari sullo scavo della cosiddetta Villa di Prastina Pacato a Tusculum. Proceedings of IX National Conference “Lazio e Sabina”, (Roma, 27–29 marzo 2012), Roma, 177–182.
  34. Piro, S., F.Cammarano, and P.Mauriello. 2000. Quantitative integration of geophysical methods for archaeological prospection. Archaeological Prospection7, no. 4: 203–213.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Piro, S., and R.Gabrielli. 2009. Multimethodological approach to investigate chamber tombs in the Sabine Necropolis at Colle del Forno (CNR, Rome, Italy). Archaeological Prospection16: 111–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Piro, S., D.Goodman, and Y.Nishimura. 2003. The study and characterization of Emperor Traiano's Villa (Altopiani di Arcinazzo, Roma) using high-resolution integrated geophysical surveys. Archaeological Prospection10: 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Piro, S., E.Iacobelli, E.Papale, and V.Beolchini. 2017. Integrated geophysical, archaeological and geological surveys for the characterization of Tusculum archaeological site (Rome, Italy). In Proceedings exstanded abstract of 12th International Conference of Archaeological Prospection, 186–187. Oxford: Archaeopress Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1-78491-677-0.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Piro, S., E.Papale, D.Zamuner, and M.Kuculdemirci. 2019. Multimethodological approach to investigate urban and suburban archaeological sites. In Innovation in Near Surface Geophysics. Instrumentation, application and data processing methods, eds. R.Persico, S.Piro, and N.Linford, 461–504. Amsterdam Netherlands: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Piro, S., L.Sambuelli, A.Godio, and R.Taormina. 2007. Beyond image analysis in processing archaeomagnetic geophysical data: Examples on chamber tombs with dromos. Near Surface Geophysics Journal (EAGE)5, no. 6: 405–414.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Piro, S., A.Samir, and L.Versino. 1998. Position and spatial orientation of magnetic bodies from archaeological magnetic surveys. Annali di Geofisica41, no. 3: 343–358.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Piro, S., P.Tsourlos, and G.N.Tsokas. 2001. Cavity detection employing advanced geophysical techniques: A case study. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics6: 3–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pizzo, A., ed. 2023. Tusculum. Excavaciones arqueológicas e investigaciones. Campañas 2018–2023. Serie Arqueológica, Editorial CSIC, c.s.
  43. Pizzo, A., M.Barahona, V.Beolchini, R.Bianco, F.De Stefano, G.Mandatori, J.Russo, and V.Tallura. 2023. Nuovi dati archeologici dal foro di Tusculum (Monte Porzio Catone, Rm). I risultati delle campagne di scavo 2019–2022. Proceedings of XIII National Conference “Lazio e Sabina”, Serie Seconda (25–27 maggio 2022), Roma.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Schmidt, A.2009. Electrical and magnetic methods in archaeological prospection. In Seeing the unseen, eds. S. R. L.Campana, and S.Piro, 67–81. London UK: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-415-44721-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Scollar, I., A.Tabbagh, A.Hesse, and I.Herzog. 1990. Archaeological prospecting and remote sensing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Seren, S., A.Eder-Hinterleitner, W.Neubauer, and S.Groh. 2004. Combined high-resolution magnetics and GPR surveys of the roman town of Flavia Solva. Near Surface Geophysics2: 63–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsokas, G.N., P.I.Tsourlos, and N.Papadopoulos. 2009. Electrical resistivity tomography: A flexible technique in solving problems of archaeological research. In Seeing the unseen, eds. S. R. L.Campana, and S.Piro, 83–104. London, UK: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-44721-8.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2210155
Loading
High resolution multi-methodological geophysical investigations to enhance the knowledge of Tusculum archaeological site (Roma, Italy)
Exploration Geophysics 55, 26 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2023.2210155
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2210155
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2210155
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ERT; GPR; gradiometer; Tusculum archaeological site

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error