1887
High resolution geophysics and non-destructive testing for archaeology and monumental heritage
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

In the field of the restoration of monumental heritage, non-destructive geophysical techniques have gained an already widely acknowledged importance. The possibility to understand the state of preservation of the artefacts without resorting to a destructive action is extremely useful in identifying unknown or presumed emergencies in order to better lead the restoration operations.

At present geophysics is underutilised and furthermore, common techniques may not be optimal for some specific targets or sites. Therefore, more controlled research is needed to better understand the applicability of these methodologies when searching for cultural heritage applications in various material types. The purpose of this paper is to provide a new approach that involves the joint use of several geophysical methods for the study of the probable causes of deterioration on a monument of considerable historical and artistic importance. The monument is the Basilica of Santa Croce in Lecce. It is a baroque church internationally well-known. The starting point of this research was the evidence that some structures of the façade are more damaged and present signs of subsidence. The study of the causes of damage was dealt with a geophysical survey using ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the choice of the two methods and allow to obtain information on buried structures both inside the church and on the façade and to locate and identify anomalies related to a restoration intervention carried out in the 80s. Furthermore, a microclimatic analysis performed inside the Basilica shows a probable connection between the humidity present on the surface and the conductive layers present in the subsoil and highlighted with the electrical method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2251520
2024-01-02
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abu Zeid, N., M.Balducci, F.Bartocci, R.Regni, and G.Santarato. 2010. Indirect estimation of injected mortar volume in historical walls using the electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Cultural Heritage11: 220–7. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2009.07.001.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Binda, L., L.Zanzi, M.Lualdi, and P.Condoleo. 2005. The use of georadar to assess damage to a masonry bell tower in cremona Italy. NDT&E International38: 171–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Calia, A., G.Leucci, N.Masini, L.Matera, R.Persico, and M.Sileo. 2012. Integrated prospecting in the Crypt of the Basilica of Saint Nicholas in Bari, Italy. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering9 no. 3: 271–81. doi:10.1088/1742‑2132/9/3/271.
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/9/3/271 [Google Scholar]
  4. Casas, A., P.Cosentino, G.Fiandaca, M.Himi, S.J.Macias, R.Martorana, and I.Teixell. 2018. Non-invasive geophysical surveys in search of the Roman Temple of Augustus under the Cathedral of Tarragona (Catalonia, Spain): A case study. Surveys in Geophysics39 no. 6: 1107–24. doi:10.1007/s10712‑018‑9470‑6.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9470-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Conyers, L.B.2006. Innovative ground-penetrating radar methods for archaeological mapping. Archaeological Prospection13 no. 2: 139–41. doi:10.1002/arp.282.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.282 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cozzolino, M., E.Di Giovanni, P.Mauriello, S.Piro, and D.Zamuner. 2018. Geophysical methods for cultural heritage management. Springer Geophysics, Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
  7. De Giorgi, L., M.Lazzari, G.Leucci, and R.Persico. 2019. Matera European Capital of Culture 2019: NDT surveys in cave churches. Proceedings of 2019 IMEKO TC-4 international conference on metrology for archaeology and cultural heritage Florence, Italy, 4–6 December 2019, pp. 103–104.
  8. Dionisio, A., F.Alegria, E.Martinho, C.Grangeia, and F.Almeida. 2011. 3-D electrical resistivity imaging as a smart monitoring method for identification of moisture sources in stone cultural heritage. Proc. of the European Workshop on cultural heritage preservation September 26–28 (Berlin Germany). pp. 218–23.
  9. Fontul, S., M.Solla, H.Cruz, J.Machado, and L.Pajewski. 2018. Ground penetrating radar investigations in the noble Hall of São carlos theater in Lisbon, portugal. Surveys in Geophysics.39: 1125–47. doi:10.1007/s10712‑018‑9477‑z.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9477-z [Google Scholar]
  10. Gabellone, F., G.Leucci, N.Masini, R.Persico, G.Quarta, and F.Grasso. 2013. Nondestructive prospecting and virtual reconstruction of the chapel of the Holy Spirit in Lecce, Italy. Near Surface Geophysics11 no. 2: 231–8. doi:10.3997/1873‑0604.2012030.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2012030 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodman, D., J.Steinberg, B.Damiata, Y.Nishimure, K.Schneider, H.Hiromichi, and N.Hisashi. 2006. GPR overlay analysis for archaeological prospection. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on ground penetrating radar, Columbus, Ohio; CD-rom.
  12. Goodman, D.2013. GPR Slice Version 7.0 Manual. http://www.gpr-survey.com (Accessed June 2013).
  13. Lazzari, M., L.De Giorgi, G.Ceraudo, and R.Persico. 2018. Geoprospecting survey in the archaeological site of Aquinum (Lazio, central Italy). Surveys in Geophysics39: 1167–80. doi:10.1007/s10712‑018‑9497‑8.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9497-8 [Google Scholar]
  14. Leucci, G.2019. Nondestructive Testing for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage: A practical guide and new perspective. Springer editore pp 217, ISBN 978-3-030-01898-6.
  15. Leucci, G., N.Masini, R.Persico, and F.Soldovieri. 2011. GPR and sonic tomography for structural restoration: the case of the cathedral of Tricarico. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering8: S76–S92. doi:10.1088/1742‑2132/8/3/S08.
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/8/3/S08 [Google Scholar]
  16. Leucci, G., R.Persico, and F.Soldovieri. 2007. Detection of fractures from GPR data: the case history of the Cathedral of Otranto. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering4: 452–61. doi:10.1088/1742‑2132/4/4/011.
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/4/4/011 [Google Scholar]
  17. Loke, M.H.2001. Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies, a practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys: RES2DINV Manual, IRIS Instruments, www.iris-instruments.com.
  18. Loke, M.H., and R.Barker. 1996. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting.44: 131–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Martinho, E., A.Dionisio, F.Almeida, M.Mendes, and C.Grangeia. 2014. Integrated geophysical approach for stone decay diagnosis in cultural heritage. Construction and Building Materials52: 345–352. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.047.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.047 [Google Scholar]
  20. Martinho, E., and A.Dionísio. 2014. Main geophysical techniques used for non-destructive evaluation in cultural built heritage: a review. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering11 no. 5, doi:10.1088/1742‑2132/11/5/053001.
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/11/5/053001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ranalli, D., M.Scozzafava, and M.Tallini. 2004. Ground penetrating radar investigations for the restoration of historic buildings: The case study of the Collemaggio Basilica (L'Aquila, Italy). Journal of Cultural Heritage5: 91–9. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2003.05.001.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2003.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Solla, M., S.Lagüela, B.Riveiro, and H.Lorenzo. 2013. Non-destructive testing for the analysis of moisture in the masonry arch bridge of Lubians (Spain). Structural Control and Health Monitoring20: 1366–76. doi:10.1002/stc.1545.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1545 [Google Scholar]
  23. Utsi, E.C.2010. The Shrine of Edward the Confessor: A study in multi-frequency GPR investigation. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ground penetrating radar, Lecce, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1109/icgpr.2010.5550263.
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/icgpr.2010.5550263
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2251520
Loading
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2251520
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Basilica di Santa Croce; ERT; GPR; microclimatic

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error