1887
Volume 55, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Reconstruction of discretely sampled geophysical data is generally done via gridding or interpolant algorithms. Such approaches typically consider local gradients which, while emphasising small-scale structure, can also introduce gridding artefacts, and modify the frequency characteristics of the original data. Here, we examine the potential of compressed sensing techniques for spatially-varying geophysical data, particularly line and gridded aeromagnetic data. We show that for sub-Nyquist sampling rates, the approach is still able to reconstruct a legible signal, and demonstrate the frequency representation of the reconstructed data varies with data sampling frequency, showing a reduced frequency range for sparser sampling. In contrast, we demonstrate that many widespread gridding approaches artificially introduce high-frequency signals into the gridded maps that are not present in the original nor in the compressed sensing reconstructions. This demonstrates the limitations of conventional gridding approaches in spectral fidelity and also suggests the conditions under which compressed sensing may be a more appropriate interpolant technique – namely when authentic spectral representation of the data is of higher precedent than small-scale target identification.

© 2023 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2254798
2024-03-03
2026-01-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2254798
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akima, H.1970. A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. Journal of the ACM17 no. 4: 589–602.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alfeld, P.1984. A trivariate clough-tocher scheme for tetrahedral data. Computer Aided Geometric Design1: 169.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrew, G., and J.Gao. 2007. Scalable training of L 1 -regularized log-linear models. Proceedings of the 24th international conference on machine learning, 33–40. doi:10.1145/1273496.1273501.
     https://doi.org/10.1145/1273496.1273501 [Google Scholar]
  4. Billings, S., and D.Richards. 2000. Quality control of gridded aeromagnetic data. Exploration Geophysics31 no. 4: 611–616. doi:10.1071/EG00611.
     https://doi.org/10.1071/EG00611 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bobin, J., J.-L.Starck, and R.Ottensamer. 2008. Compressed sensing in astronomy. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing2 no. 5: 718–726. doi:10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2005337.
     https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2005337 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bracewell, R.2000. The Fourier transform and its applications. 3rd ed.Singapore: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
  7. Briggs, J.1974. Machine contouring using minimum curvature. Geophysics39: 39–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Candes, E.J., J.Romberg, and T.Tao. 2006. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory52 no. 2: 489–509. doi:10.1109/TIT.2005.862083.
     https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2005.862083 [Google Scholar]
  9. Caress, D.W., and R.L.Parker. 1989. Spectral interpolation and downward continuation of marine magnetic anomaly data. Journal of Geophysical Research94 no. B12: 17393. doi:10.1029/JB094iB12p17393.
     https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB12p17393 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dentith, M., and S.T.Mudge. 2014. Geophysics for the mineral exploration geoscientist.1st ed.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139024358
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139024358
  11. Donoho, D.L.2006. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory52 no. 4: 1289–1306. doi:10.1109/TIT.2006.871582.
     https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 [Google Scholar]
  12. El-Ashkar, A.M., H.Shendy, W.El-Shafai, T.E.S.Taha, A.S.El-Fishawy, M.A.El-Nabi, and F.E.A.El-Samie. 2021. Compressed sensing for SAR image reconstruction. 2021 international conference on electronic engineering (ICEEM), 1–6. doi:10.1109/ICEEM52022.2021.9480655
     https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEM52022.2021.9480655 [Google Scholar]
  13. Greengard, L., and J.-Y.Lee. 2004. Accelerating the nonuniform fast Fourier transform. SIAM Review46 no. 3: 443–454. doi:10.1137/S003614450343200X.
     https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450343200X [Google Scholar]
  14. Guspí, F., and B.Introcaso. 2000. A sparse spectrum technique for gridding and separating potential field anomalies. GEOPHYSICS65 no. 4: 1154–1161. doi:10.1190/1.1444808.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444808 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hansen, R.O.1993. Interpretive gridding by anisotropic kriging. GEOPHYSICS58 no. 10: 1491–1497. doi:10.1190/1.1443363.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443363 [Google Scholar]
  16. Keiner, J., S.Kunis, and D.Potts. 2009. Using NFFT 3—A software library for various nonequispaced fast Fourier transforms. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software36 no. 4: 19:1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar, R., H.Wason, and F.J.Herrmann. 2015. Source separation for simultaneous towed-streamer marine acquisition—A compressed sensing approach. GEOPHYSICS80 no. 6: WD73–WD88. doi:10.1190/geo2015‑0108.1.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0108.1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kutz, J.N.2013. Data-driven modeling & scientific computation: Methods for complex systems & big data,1st ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
  19. Li, X., A.Y.Aravkin, T.van Leeuwen, and F.J.Herrmann. 2012. Fast randomized full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing. GEOPHYSICS77 no. 3: A13–A17. doi:10.1190/geo2011‑0410.1.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0410.1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Liang, D., B.Liu, J.Wang, and L.Ying. 2009. Accelerating SENSE using compressed sensing: Compressed sensing SENSE. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine62 no. 6: 1574–1584. doi:10.1002/mrm.22161.
     https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22161 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lustig, M., D.Donoho, and J.Pauly. 2007. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine58 no. 6: 1182–1195.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Nielson, G.1983. A method for interpolating scattered data based upon a minimum norm network. Math. Comp.40: 253.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Nocedal, J.1980. Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage. Mathematics of Computation35 no. 151: 773–782. doi:10.1090/S0025‑5718‑1980‑0572855‑7.
     https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0572855-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pilikos, G., and A.C.Faul. 2017. Bayesian feature learning for seismic compressive sensing and denoising. GEOPHYSICS82 no. 6: O91–O104. doi:10.1190/geo2016‑0373.1.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0373.1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rani, M., S.B.Dhok, and R.B.Deshmukh. 2018. A systematic review of compressive sensing: Concepts, implementations and applications. IEEE Access6: 4875–4894. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793851.
     https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793851 [Google Scholar]
  26. Reid, A.1980. Aeromagnetic survey design. Geophysics45 no. 5: 973–976.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Robinson, E.A., and S.Treitel. 2000. Geophysical signal analysis. New Jersey: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  28. Smith, W., and P.Wessel. 1990. Gridding with continuous curvatures splines in tension. Geophysics55 no. 3: 293–305.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Taylor, R.2016. Compressed sensing in python (Pyrunner.Com, p. 7). https://www.pyrunner.com/weblog/B/index.html.
  30. Zhang, M.2021. Time-lapse seismic data reconstruction using compressive sensing. GEOPHYSICS86 no. 5: P37–P48. doi:10.1190/geo2020‑0746.1.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0746.1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhou, R., G.Wang, D.Zhao, Y.Zou, and T.Zhang. 2019. Super-Resolution of low-quality images based on compressed sensing and sequence information. 2019 IEEE 90th vehicular technology conference (VTC2019-fall), 1–5. doi:10.1109/VTCFall.2019.8891073
     https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCFall.2019.8891073 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2254798
Loading
Compressed sensing reconstruction of sparse geophysical data: an example from regional magnetics
Exploration Geophysics 55, 139 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2023.2254798
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2254798
/content/journals/10.1080/08123985.2023.2254798
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Compressed sensing; gridding; magnetics; sparse data

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error