oa The damping factor improved the algorithm in semi-airborne transient electromagnetic modelling based on accelerated FDTD

References

1. Chang, J.H., X.Wu, K.X.Lei, P.F.Lv, Y.Zhao, and Q.X.Meng. 2022. Three-dimensional modeling of ground-airborne transient electromagnetic responses of typical models based on the finite difference approach. Journal of Applied Geophysics195: 1–13.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chang, J.H., and G.Q.Xue. 2019. A comparison of surface-to-coal mine roadway TEM and surface TEM responses to water-enriched bodies. IEEE Access7: 167320–8.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Commer, M., G.M.Hoversten, and E.S.Um. 2015. Transient-electromagnetic finite-difference time-domain earth modeling over steel infrastructure. Geophysics80: E147–E62.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Commer, M., and G.Newman. 2004. A parallel finite-difference approach for 3D transient electromagnetic modeling with galvanic sources. Geophysics65: 1192–202.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Commer, M., and G.Newman. 2006. An accelerated time domain finite difference simulation scheme for three-dimensional transient electromagnetic modeling using geometric multigrid concepts. Radio Science41: 1–15.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Guptasarma, D.1982. Computation of the time-domain response of a polarizable ground. Geophysics47: 1574–6.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jang, H., S.O.Cho, B.Kim, H.J.Kim, and M.J.Nam. 2021. Three-dimensional finite-difference modeling of time-domain electromagnetic responses for a large-loop source. Geoscience Journal25: 675–84.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ji, Y.J., Y.Q.Wu, S.S.Guan, and X.J.Zhao. 2018. 3D numerical modeling of induced-polarization electromagnetic response based on the finite-difference time-domain method. Geophysics85: E385–E98.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ji, Y.J., Y.Zhu, M.M.Yu, D.S.Li, and S.S.Guan. 2019. Calculation and application of full-wave airborne transient electromagnetic data in EM detection. Journal of Central South University4: 1011–20.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Li, S.C., H.F.Sun, X.S.Lu, and X.Li. 2014. Three-dimensional modeling of transient electromagnetic responses of water-bearing structure in front of a tunnel face. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics19: 13–32.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Li, D.S., Z.B.Tian, Y.L.Ma, J.Y.Gu, Y.J.Ji, and S.Y.Li. 2019. Application of grounded electrical source airborne transient electromagnetic (GREATEM) system in goaf water detection. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics24 no. 3: 387–97.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Liu, S.B., C.D.Chen, and H.F.Sun. 2022. Fast 3D transient electromagnetic forward modeling using BEDS-FDTD algorithm and GPU parallelization. Geophysics87: E359–E75.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Meng, X.D., S.L.Qiu, and Y.J.Ji. 2020. Grounded electrical source ground-airborne transient electromagnetic modelling with fictitious wave field methods. Journal of Earth System Science129: 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sun, H.F., X.Li, and S.C.Li. 2013. Three-dimensional FDTD modeling of TEM excited by a loop source considering ramp time. Chinese Journal of Geophysics56: 1049–64.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Sun, H.F., S.B.Liu, and Y.Yang. 2021. Crank-Nicolson FDTD 3D forward modeling for the transient electromagnetic field. Chinese Journal of Geophysics66: 343–54.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Wang, T., and G.W.Hohmann. 1993. A finite-difference time-domain solution for three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling. Geophysics58: 797–809.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Wu, Q., D.S.Li, C.D.Jiang, Y.J.Ji, Y.L.Wen, and H.Luan. 2019. Ground-source airborne time-domain ElectroMagnetic (GATEM) modelling and interpretation method for a rough medium based on fractional diffusion. Geophysical Journal International217 no. 3: 1915–28.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Xu, Y.C., J.Lin, S.Y.Li, Y.Wang, and Y.J.Ji. 2012. Calculation of full-waveform airborne electromagnetic response with three-dimension finite-difference solution in time-domain. Chinese Journal of Geophysics55: 2105–44.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Xue, G.Q., Y.J.Ji, and X.Li. 2007. Pseudo-seismic wavelet transformation of transient electromagnetic response in engineering geology exploration. Geophysical Research Letters34: L16405, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Xue, G.Q., X.Li, H.J.Quan, S.Jaggar, and N.N.Zhou. 2012. Physical simulation and application of a new TEM configuration. Environmental Earth Science67: 1291–8.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Yan, S., M.S.Chen, and J.M.Fu. 2002. Direct time-domain numerical analysis of transient electromagnetic fields. Chinese Journal of Geophysics45: 275–84.
    [Google Scholar]