1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Accurate and precise identification of lithological facies is vital to understand geological variation in a proven reservoir. Four specific different machine learning (ML) classification algorithms are implemented to predict facies on an open dataset in the Panoma gas field in southwest Kansas, USA. The objective is improvement of facies classification accuracy with robust application of ML technique compared to previous published work on the same dataset. A total of 4,149 data samples are available for analysis with known facies from the core data where each sample point contains four or five measured properties (wire-line logs), and two derived geological properties (geological constraining variables). Facies classification is addressed with four well-known classification algorithm which are artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), decision trees and gaussian process classifier (GPC). High dimensionality, non-linear correlation and overlapping feature space of facies classes make the non-parametric method more suitable to handle complex datasets. Among the presented classifiers, ANN perform better relative to others on validation dataset. It is observed that our present approach of adding more input features, increasing number of training dataset and efficient implementation of algorithm have improved facies prediction accuracy significantly on a blind well.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072918
2019-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akinnikawe, O., Lyne, S., & Roberts, J. (2018). Synthetic Well Log Generation Using Machine Learning Techniques. Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA.
  2. Bhatt, A. (2002). Reservoir properties from well logs using neural networks. PhD. Dissertation, Department of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics. Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
  3. Dubois, M. K., Bohling, G. C., & Chakrabarti, S. (2007). Comparison of four approaches to a rock facies classification problem. Computers & Geosciences, 33(5), 599-617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2006.08.011
  4. Eshkalak, M. O., Mohaghegh, S. D., & Esmaili, S. (2013). Synthetic, Geomechanical Logs For Marcellus Shale. Paper presented at the SPE Digital Energy Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/163690-MS
  5. Eshkalak, M. O., Mohaghegh, S. D., & Esmaili, S. (2014). Geomechanical Properties of Unconventional Shale Reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Engineering, 2014, 10. doi:10.1155/2014/961641
  6. Hall, B. (2016). Facies classification using machine learning. The Leading Edge, 35(10), 906-909. doi:10.1190/tle35100906.1
  7. Johnson, L. M., Rezaee, R., Kadkhodaie, A., Smith, G., & Yu, H. (2018). Geochemical property modelling of a potential shale reservoir in the Canning Basin (Western Australia), using Artificial Neural Networks and geostatistical tools. Computers & Geosciences, 120, 73-81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.08.004
  8. Lopes, R., & Jorge, A. (2017). Mind the Gap: A Well Log Data Analysis.
  9. Saggaf M., M., & Nebrija L., E. (2000). Estimation Of Lithologies And Depositional Facies From Wireline Logs (Vol. 84).
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072918
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ANN; facies classification; GPC; machine learning; SVM
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error