1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

To evaluate the extent of a low salinity aquifer within the continental shelf offshore New Jersey, USA, we adapt a Bayesian trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) algorithm for jointly inverting surface towed controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) and seafloor magnetotelluric (MT) data. Owing to the relatively flat seafloor topography and layered underlying geology, our inversion is parametrized to produce an ensemble of 1D models at each site along the tow line. The results identify a high probability region of high resistivity of varying depth and thickness in the upper 500 m of the continental shelf, corroborating results from a previous study that used a regularized, gradient-based 2D inversion method. Using a combination of synthetic studies and real data we also evaluate the joint model parameter uncertainty in comparison to the uncertainty obtained from the individual data sets and demonstrate quantitatively that joint inversion offers reduced uncertainty. In addition, we show with a Monte Carlo scheme, how the Bayesian model ensemble can subsequently be used to derive quantitative uncertainty estimates of pore water salinity within the low salinity aquifer. The ability to produce meaningful non-linear uncertainty estimates on both conductivity as well as related parameters is a strong motivator for the use of Bayesian inversion methods when computationally feasible.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072959
2019-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agostinetti, N. P. and Bodin, T., 2018. Flexible Coupling in Joint Inversions: A Bayesian Structure Decoupling Algorithm, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(10), 8798–8826.
  2. Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Tkalcic, H., Arroucau, P., Gallagher, K., and Rawlinson, N., 2012. Transdimensional inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117(B2).
  3. Bouchedda, A., Chouteau, M., Binley, A., and Giroux, B., 2012. 2-D joint structural inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground penetrating radar data, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 78, 52–67.
  4. Calvetti, D. and Somersalo, E., 2018. Inverse problems: From regularization to Bayesian inference, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 10(3), e1427.
  5. Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L., and Constable, C. G., 1987. Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics, 52(3), 289–300.
  6. Gallardo, L. A. and Meju, M. A., 2004. Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B3), 106–11.
  7. Geyer, C. J. and Moller, J., 1994. Simulation Procudures and Likelihood Inference for Spatial Point Processes, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 21(4), 359–373.
  8. eds Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D., 1995. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice, CRC press.
  9. Gomez Trevino, E. and Edwards, R. N., 1983. Electromagnetic soundings in the sedimentary basin of southern Ontario – A case history, Geophysics, 48(3), 311–330.
  10. Green, P. J., 1995. Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo Computation and Bayesian Model Determination, Biometrika, 82(4), 711.
  11. Hastings, W. K., 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57(1), 97–109.
  12. Hoversten, G. M., Cassassuce, F., Gasperikova, E., Newman, G. A., Chen, J., Rubin, Y., Hou, Z., and Vasco, D., 2006. Direct reservoir parameter estimation using joint inversion of marine seismic AVA and CSEM data, Geophysics, 71(3), C1–C13.
  13. Jardani, A., Revil, A., Slob, E., and Sollner, W., 2010. Stochastic joint inversion of 2D seismic and seismoelectric signals in linear poroelastic materials: A numerical investigation, Geophysics, 75(1), N19–N31.
  14. Key, K., 2009. 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers, Geophysics, 74(2), F9–F20.
  15. Lelievre, P. G., Farquharson, C. G., and Hurich, C. A., 2012. Joint inversion of seismic traveltimes and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration, Geophysics, 77(1), K1–K15.
  16. Lewis, E., 1980. The practical salinity scale 1978 and its antecedents, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 5(1), 3–8.
  17. MacGregor, L. and Sinha, M., 2000. Use of marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding for sub-basalt exploration, Geophysical Prospecting, 48(6), 1091–1106.
  18. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E., 1953. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6), 1087–1092.
  19. Mitrovica, J. X. and Forte, A. M., 2004. A new inference of mantle viscosity based upon joint inversion of convection and glacial isostatic adjustment data, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 225(1-2), 177–189.
  20. Mosegaard, K. and Tarantola, A., 1995. Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100(B7), 12431–12447.
  21. Newman, G. A. and Alumbaugh, D. L., 2000. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients, Geophysical Journal International, 140(2), 410–424.
  22. Rabben, T. E., Tjelmeland, H., and Ursin, B., 2008. Non-linear Bayesian joint inversion of seismic reflection coefficients, Geophysical Journal International, 173(1), 265–280.
  23. Sasaki, Y., 1989. Two-dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole-dipole resistivity data, Geophysics, 54(2), 254–262.
  24. Vozoff, K. and Jupp, D. L. B., 1975. Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 42(3), 977–991.
  25. Ward, S. H. and Hohmann, G. W., 1987. 4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications, in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, pp. 130–311, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  26. Yokota, Y., Koketsu, K., Fujii, Y., Satake, K., Sakai, S., Shinohara, M., and Kanazawa, T., 2011. Joint inversion of strong motion, teleseismic, geodetic, and tsunami datasets for the rupture process of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Geophysical Research Letters, 38(7)
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072959
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bayesian methods; freshwater aquifers; joint inversion; marine electromagnetics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error