1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Although 3D airborne electromagnetic inversions have improved greatly in recent years, the presence of smooth boundaries has often been a strong criticism. This smoothness can easily be remedied by applying different types of regularization and constraints to the model, but another approach is to learn what underlying structures or boundaries these smooth transitions represent.

To perform this advanced inversion interpretation, we trained a machine learning algorithm known as VNet to identify the relationship between a true synthetic model and the resulting smooth 3D inversion model. By training on one section of the model and predicting on another, the algorithm was able to learn the general relationships required to intelligently sharpen the inversion model in the prediction area. The resulting images approximate the true synthetic model to a much closer degree compared to the original inversion model. The VNet was trained in two ways, one to predict a conductivity value for each pixel, and another to predict a classification unit for each pixel presuming the conductivity for each class is known. Each method performed similarly well with some minor differences, which gives the user some options depending on the scenario and how much a priori information is known.

Overall this automatic interpretation technique worked well over a synthetic model, and future simulations will be run in order to make the method more robust and applicable for field scenarios.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072978
2019-12-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brown, W.M, Gedeon,T.D., Groves, D. I, and Barnes, R.G., 2000, Artificial neural networks: A new method for mineral prospectivity mapping. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 47:4, 757-770.
  2. Cracknell, M. and Reading, A.M, 2013, Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information. Computers and Geosciences, 63, 22-33.
  3. Granek, J. and Haber, E., 2016, Advanced geoscience targeting via focused machine learning applied to the QUEST project dataset, British Columbia. Geoscience BC Summary of Activities 2015. Geoscience BC Report 2016-1, 77-126. Granek, J., Haber, E., and Holtham, E., 2016, Resource Management through Machine Learning. In 25th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition hosted by ASEG-PESA-AIG 2016, 1-5.
  4. Granek, J., 2016, Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Mineral Prospectivity Mapping, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of British Columbia.
  5. Haber, E., and Modersitzki, J., 2006. Intensity gradient based registration and fusion of multi-modal images. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 726-733.
  6. Haber, E., 2019, A deep learning geoscience package, Publication in Process.
  7. Isikdogan, F., Bovik, A., and Passalacqua, P., 2017, Surface Water Mapping by Deep Learning. IEEE Journal of Selected Topic Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10-11, 4909-4918.
  8. Long,Y et al., 2017, Convolutional Neural Networks for Water Body Extraction from Landsat Imagery, International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications. 55, 2486-2498.
  9. Milletari, F., Naveb, N., Ahmadi,S. 2016, V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation, 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision IEEE, 565-571.
  10. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T., 2015, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, 234-241.
  11. Sørensen, K., and Auken, E., 2004, SkyTEM–a new highresolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics, 35, 194-202.
  12. Voss, K., Swenson, S., and Rodell K., 2015, Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE. Water Resources Research, 51, 1-22
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072978
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): artificial intelligence; electromagnetics; interpretation; inversion; machine learning
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error