1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

Summary

3D seismic technology has become a popular exploration and development tool among coal mining companies in Australia in the last ten years. Traditionally the main use of these seismic data is to inform the mine of the structural features such as faults, rolls and dykes. There have been very few attempts to use quantitative seismic interpretation to help understand geological risks ahead of longwall mining. The purpose of this paper is to provide an example of roof and floor characterisation using post-stack and prestack seismic inversion.

First step in the study was to understand the relationship between elastic and rock properties using log data. Thus, when looking at the relationship between lithology/gamma ray response and compressional impedance I observed that massive, blocky sandstones have high velocity and density and hence high compressional impedance, while siltstones, claystones and fine-grained sands have low density, velocity and low compressional impedance. Lithology discriminators lambda-rho and mu-rho crossplots also showed good separation of blocky clean, sands and soft fine-grained sands. As a second step I ran pre-stack and post-stack inversions using a small subset of the boreholes. Thirdly, upon reviewing products of the inversions against all log data, I found the pre-stack results to be more superior than the post-stack.

The current work highlighted a few areas of blocky sandstone roof and weak floor. This information could be used to inform the future mine operations and design.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072990
2019-12-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andreson, P., 2009. Comparing post-stack AVO inversion to prestack inversion for estimating rock properties. CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention, 669-672
  2. Hatherly, P., Zhou, B., Peters, and Urosevic, M., 2008. Acoustic impedance inversion for geotechnical evaluation in underground coal mining. SEG Las Vegas 2008 Annual Meeting, 3600-3603.
  3. Kasangula, M. 2011. BMA Guidelines to Geotechnical Constraints on Longwall Mining Projects.
  4. Morcote, A., Mavko, G., and Prasad, M., 2010. Dynamic elastic properties of coal. Geophysics, 75(6), E227-E234
  5. Market, J., 2019. Internal BHP report.
  6. Ødegaard, E. and Avseth, P., 2003. Interpretation of Elastic Inversion Results Using Rock Physics Templates: EAGE, Expanded Abstracts, E1.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072990
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): coal; longwall mining; QI; seismic inversion
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error