1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

2.5D (2D geology, 3D source) inversion of airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data has evolved into a routine and established practice on datasets from an array of applications. Large datasets may be inverted in days using conventional PC’s, or cloud computing for faster results.

The 2.5D inversions in this study were carried out using a highly modified adaptation of the ArjunAir program originally developed by the CSIRO and subsequently by AMIRA project P223F. The new program is called Moksha.

Results are presented from a continental scale AEM regional mapping survey carried out by Geoscience Australia. 2.5D inversions performed in a study area in the Mammoth Mines mineral district of Queensland defined discrete conductivity anomalies on a line over the Mount Gordon Fault Zone, and imaged a series of steeply-dipping conductors on a nearby regional traverse.

The study demonstrated the ability of 2.5D inversions to image steeply-dipping and folded geology, and present possible exploration targets, in a mineralised deformed terrane.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072993
2019-12-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chen, J., Raiche, A., Sugeng, F., and Macnae, J., 2.5D conductivity inversion of airborne EM data: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1998, 756-759.
  2. FitzGerald, D., Silic, J., and Paterson, R., 2.5D AEM and Geology: 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018.
  3. Hutton, L., and Wilson, I., 1985: 1:100 000 Geological Map Commentary, Mammoth Mines Region, Queensland, Bureau of Mineral Resources and Geological Survey of Queensland, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
  4. Ley-Cooper, Y. and Brodie, R., One step towards a national conductivity map of Australia: Annual Geoscience Exploration Seminar (AGES) Proceedings, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, 19-20 March 2019, Northern Territory Geological Survey, Darwin, 27-30.
  5. Raiche, A., Wilson, G. and Sugeng, F., 2007, Practical 3D inversion – The P223F Software Suite: 19th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition Abstracts, ASEG, 68-69.
  6. Silic, J., Paterson, R., FitzGerald, D., and Archer, T., 2015, Comparing 1D and 2.5D AEM inversions in 3D geological mapping using a new inversion solver: 14th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, Extended Abstracts.
  7. Silic, J., Paterson, R., and FitzGerald, D., 2.5D vs 1D Forward and Inversion Methods at a Survey Scale: A Case Study: ASEG Extended Abstracts 2018 (1) 1-8.
  8. Wilson, G., Raiche, A.P. and Sugeng, F., 2006, 2.5D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data: Exploration Geophysics, 27, 363-371.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072993
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AusAEM; electromagnetic; geology; inversion; mapping
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error