1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

In recent years, magnetotelluric (MT) processing has become computationally intensive as the scale and size of MT surveys being run increases. Consequently, High Performance Computing (HPC) is now becoming a valuable tool for timely processing and modelling of these large MT datasets. As part of the MT component of the 2017-2019 Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) funded Geoscience Data Enhanced Virtual Laboratory (DeVL) continuity project, The National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) at the Australian National University will enable MT datasets from The University of Adelaide to be added to the NCI HPC platform with the goal of creating a more Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) and open public resource. A focus will be on making the time series datasets more suitable for use on HPC and more interoperable with other Earth science disciplines, where High Performance Data (HPD) formats will allow for better scalability and performance. Metadata attributes, as defined by the Australian MT research community, will be added directly to the time series data files. Additionally, time series processing and 3D inversion codes are being optimised for HPD/HPC, with the end goal of rapid time series processing and 3D inversion. Making FAIR MT time series available on HPC can lead to a transformative change in the way MT data analysis is routinely conducted and such a change has the capacity to create new ways of doing collaborative and transparent MT analysis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073015
2019-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aivazpourporgou, S., Thiel, S., Hayman, P.C., Moresi, L.N., and Heinson, G., 2015, Decompression melting driving intraplate volcanism in Australia: Evidence from magnetotelluric sounding: Geophysical Research Letters, 42, 346-354.
  2. Bryan, B.A., 2013, High-performance computing tools for the integrated assessment and modelling of social–ecological systems: Environmental Modelling & Software, 39, 295-303.
  3. Chave, A.D., and Thomson, D.J., 1989, Some comments on magnetotelluric response function estimation: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 94, 14215-14225.
  4. Chave, A.D., and Thomson, D.J., 2004, Bounded influence magnetotelluric response function estimation: Geophysical Journal International, 157, 988–1006.
  5. Conway, D., Simpson, J., Didana, Y., Rugari, J., and Heinson, G., 2018, Probabilistic Magnetotelluric Inversion with Adaptive Regularisation Using the No-U-Turns Sampler: Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175, 2881-2894.
  6. Conway, D., Alexander, B., King, M., Heinson, G., and Kee, Y., 2019, Inverting magnetotelluric responses in a three-dimensional earth using fast forward approximations based on artificial neural networks: Computers and Geosciences, 127, 44-52.
  7. Domenico, B., Caron, J., Davis, E., Kambic, R., and Nativi, S., 2002, Thematic real-time environmental distributed data services (THREDDS): Incorporating interactive analysis tools into NSDL: Journal of Digital Information, 2, ISSN 1368-7506. Available at https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/51/54, Date accessed: 17 Mar. 2019
  8. Duan, J., Taylor, D., Czarnota, K., Cayley, R., and Chopping, R., 2016; AusLAMP MT Over Victoria: New Insight from 3D Modelling Highlights Regions of Anomalously Conductive Mantle and Unexpected Linear Trends in the Crust: ASEG Extended Abstracts, 1-6.
  9. Egbert, G.D., and Eisel, M., 1998, EMTF: Programs for Robust Single Station and Remote Reference Analysis of Magnetotelluric Data: UNIX (and PC).
  10. Egbert, G.D., 2011, Magnetotelluric Data Processing. In: Gupta H.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht.
  11. Egbert, G.D., and Kelbert, A., 2012, Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems: Geophysical Journal International, 189, 251-267.
  12. Eisel, M., and Egbert, G.D., 2001, On the stability of magnetotelluric transfer function estimates and the reliability of their variances: Geophysical Journal International, 144, 65-82.
  13. Geoscience Australia, 2014, AusLAMP, accessed 17 March 2019, http://www.ga.gov.au/about/projects/resources/auslamp
  14. Goleby, B.R., Thiel, S. and Heinson, G., 2018, Magnetotelluric imaging of intracontinental deformation zones: example of the Musgraves Province in Central Australia: 24th EM Induction Workshop, Helsingør, Denmark.
  15. Heinson, G.S., Direen, N.G., and Gill, R.M., 2006, Magnetotelluric evidence for a deep-crustal mineralizing system beneath the Olympic Dam iron oxide copper-gold deposit, southern Australia: Geology, 34, 573–576.
  16. Hills, D.J., Downs, R.R., Duerr, R., Goldstein, J.C., Parsons, M.A., and Ramapriyan, H.K., 2015, The importance of data set provenance for science: Eos, 96.
  17. Kelbert, A., Meqbel, N., Egbert, G.D., & Tandon, K., 2014, ModEM: a modular system for inversion of electromagnetic geophysical data: Computers & Geosciences, 66, 40-53.
  18. Kelbert, A., Erofeeva, S., Trabant, C., Karstens, R., and Van Fossen, M., 2018, Taking magnetotelluric data out of the drawer: Eos, 99.
  19. Kirkby, A., Heinson, G., Holford, S., Thiel, S., 2015, Mapping fractures using 1D anisotropic modelling of magnetotelluric data: a case study from the Otway Basin, Victoria, Australia: Geophysical Journal International, 201, 1961–1976.
  20. Kirkby, A., et al., 2019 (in press), Developing metadata standards for time series magnetotelluric data: Preview, 199.
  21. Larsen, J.C., Mackie, R.L., Manzella, A., Fiordelisi, A. and Rieven, S., 1996, Robust smooth magnetotelluric transfer functions: Geophysical Journal International, 124, 801–819.
  22. Larraondo, P.R., Pringle, S., Antony, J., and Evans, B., 2017, GSKY: A scalable, distributed geospatial data-server, In: Proceedings of the Academic Research Stream at the Annual Conference Locate, Research@ Locate, 7-12.
  23. Mandolesi, E., Ogaya, X., Campanyà, J., and Agostinetti, N.P., 2018, A reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for 1D inversion of magnetotelluric data: Computers & Geosciences, 113, 94-105.
  24. Manoj, C. and Nagarajan, N., 2003, The application of artificial neural networks to magnetotelluric time-series analysis: Geophysical Journal International, 153, 409–423.
  25. Neumann, G.A., 2016, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter, Reduced Data Record and Derived Products, Software Interface Specification; Version 2.6; accessed 19 March 2019; http://pds-geosciences.wustl.edu/lro/lro-l-lola-3-rdrv1/ lrolol_1xxx/document/rdrsis.htm
  26. NCI, 2016, Mapping the electric underground: NCI e-Newsletters, accessed 19 March 2019, http://nci.org.au/research/mappingelectric-underground/
  27. Robertson, K., Heinson, G., and Thiel, S., 2016, Lithospheric reworking at the Proterozoic–Phanerozoic transition of Australia imaged using AusLAMP Magnetotelluric data: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 452, 27-35.
  28. Robertson, K., Thiel, S., and Heinson, G., 2018a, Evolving 3D lithospheric resistivity models across southern Australia derived from AusLAMP MT: ASEG Extended Abstracts, 1, 1-5.
  29. Robertson, K., Thiel, S., and Meqbel, N., 2018b, An investigation into modeling parameters with the ModEM3DMT inversion code: 24th EM Induction Workshop, Helsingør, Denmark.
  30. Rosas-Carbajal, M., Linde, N., Kalscheuer, T., and Vrugt, J.A., 2013, Two-dimensional probabilistic inversion of plane-wave electromagnetic data: methodology, model constraints and joint inversion with electrical resistivity data: Geophysical Journal International, 196, 1508-1524.
  31. Rosas-Carbajal, M., Linde, N., Peacock, J., Zyserman, F.I., Kalscheuer, T., and Thiel, S., 2015, Probabilistic 3-D time-lapse inversion of magnetotelluric data: application to an enhanced geothermal system: Geophysical Supplements to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 203, 1946-1960.
  32. Sielle, H., and Visser, G., 2018, Understanding the resolvability of mineral systems in MT data: an Australian perspective: 24th EM Induction Workshop, Helsingør, Denmark.
  33. Thiel, S., and Heinson, G., 2013, Electrical conductors in Archean mantle—Result of plume interaction?: Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 2947-2952.
  34. Wight, D. E., 1987, Society of Exploration Geophysicists MT/EMAP Data Interchange Standard, https://seg.org/Portals/0/SEG/News%20and%20Resources/Technic al%20Standards/seg_mt_emap_1987.pdf
  35. Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3 (1): 160018. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073015
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error