1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

3D seismic is routinely used for structural characterisation for underground coal operations, however the implementation of this technology for shallow, open-cut resources has been limited. The perceived high cost of shallow 3D seismic has been one of the main factors holding it back. This paper will demonstrate that by adopting and adapting best practice technologies from the petroleum industry, 3D seismic is not only cost effective but also delivers higher confidence resource knowledge compared to traditional pattern grid structural and coal surface drilling. With higher resolution understanding of structure affecting the coal resource, the business can better predict and mitigate risks such as Geotechnical events, and minimise impacts to production with an improved mine plan.

A series of trial surveys were acquired over a range of geological settings, including variable thickness Tertiary basalt cover, multiple seams and very shallow target seams. Success of the 3D seismic technique in all of these trials validated the larger scale implementation at other open-cut mines. Next, through a process of iterative improvement of parameters and survey design, improvements in productivity and data resolution of these surveys were made to maximise value of information. The third step was to embed the subsurface knowledge obtained from seismic data into mine planning workflows and decisions. This work has already resulted in reductions in drilling and adjustments to geotechnical models.

Current work is focussing on further optimisation of the data acquisition, processing and interpretation workflows to ensure fit-for-purpose, long-lived information is delivered to the business. This includes revisiting and reprocessing legacy 3D datasets to harness advances in processing algorithms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073028
2019-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dean, T., 2016, High Productivity Vibroseis Techniques: a Review: Preview, 184, 36-40
  2. Mougenot, D., and Boucard, D., 2012, How technology drives high-productuvuty Vibroseis: a historical perspective: Geophysical Prospecting, 60, 602-607.
  3. Pavlova, M., 2019, Lithology characterization of the roof and floor of the Moranbah measures coal seam using post-stack and pre-stack seismic inversion: 2nd AEGC, Extended Abstracts, Perth, 6p.
  4. Peters, T., 2005, The successful integration of 3D seismic into the mining process: Practical examples from Bowen Basin underground coal mines: Bowen Basin Symposium, Proceedings.
  5. Peters, T., and Hendrick, N., 2005, applications of seismic reflection in the coal environment: Bowen Basin Symposium, Proceedings.
  6. Rozemond, J., 1996, Slip-sweep acquisition: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 64-67.
  7. Vermeer, G., 2012, 3D Seismic Survey Design 2nd edition: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073028
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D seismic; coal; open-cut mining; structure
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error