1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The Acropolis prospect is a vein-style magnetite (±apatite ±hematite) system located ~20 km southwest from the giant Olympic Dam iron-oxide copper gold (IOCG) deposit, South Australia. A whole rock dataset comprising 4,864 core samples from fourteen drillholes was analysed using multivariate statistics to understand and identify geochemical signatures of mineralization at Acropolis. Statistical analyses included principal component analysis, hierarchical and k-means clustering. The results of statistical analyses are overlaid and interpreted relative to a 3D implicit geological model of the prospect, and encompass a projection of mineralization signature as PC1.

The mineralization footprint of Acropolis is multi-element and typified by a distinct ‘magnetite’ signature of Fe-V-Ni-Co. Such a signature is developed in the western part of the prospect and represents samples containing >60 wt% Fe. In contrast, the ‘hematite’ signature displays an association of REE, W, Sn, Sb, U, Th, Ca, and P and is present throughout the prospect. Furthermore, kriged values of Cu (> 200 ppm) demonstrate an offset from Ferich veins, thus supporting a genetic model in which (earlier) Cu-Au-deficient veins in which magnetite is the dominant Fe-oxide are subsequently overprinted by Cu-bearing hematite-dominant mineralization.

Results obtained provide insights into the evolution from magnetite- to hematite-dominant IOCG systems and may offer a proxy for exploration and discovery of economically significant IOCG deposits at shallower levels in the eastern Gawler Craton.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073050
2019-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, S.R., McPhie, J., Ferris, G., and Simpson, C., 2008, Evolution and architecture of a large felsic Igneous Province in western Laurentia: the 1.6 Ga Gawler Range Volcanics, South Australia. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 172, 132–147.
  2. Barton, M.D., 2014, Iron oxide (–Cu–Au–REE–P–Ag–U–Co) systems: In: Holland, H.D., and Turekian, K.K. (Eds.), Treatise on Geochemistry, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Oxford, 515–541.
  3. Caciagli, N., 2016, Multielement geochemical modelling for mine planning: case study from an epithermal gold deposit: In: Martín-Fernández, J.A., and Thió-Henestrosa, S. (Eds.), Compositional Data Analysis. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 187, 45–61.
  4. Cross, K.C., 1993, Acropolis and Wirrda Well: In: Drexel, J.F., Preiss, W.V., and Parker, A.J. (eds.), The Geology of South Australia. vol. 1, The Precambrian. Geological Survey of South Australia, South Australia, 138 pp.
  5. Dmitrijeva, M., Ehrig, K., Ciobanu, C., Cook, N. Verdugo-Ihl, M., and Metcalfe, A., 2019, Defining IOCG signatures through compositional data analysis: A case study of lithogeochemical zoning from the Olympic Dam deposit, South Australia: Ore Geology Reviews, 105, 86-101.
  6. Ehrig, K., McPhie, J., and Kamenetsky, V., 2012, Geology and mineralogical zonation of the Olympic Dam iron oxide Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit, South Australia: Economic Geology, Special Publication 16, 237-267.
  7. Ehrig, K. Kamenetsky, V.S., McPhie, J. Apukhtina, O., Ciobanu, C., Cook, N., Kontonikas-Charos, A., and Krneta, S. 2017, The IOCG-IOA Olympic Dam Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit and nearby prospects, South Australia: Proceedings, 14th Biennial SGA Meeting ‘Mineral Resources to Discover’ Québec City, Canada, vol. 3, p. 823-826.
  8. Groves, D.I., Bierlein, F.P., Meinert, L.D., and Hitzman, M.W., 2010, Iron Oxide Copper-Gold (IOCG) deposits through earth history: implications for origin, lithospheric setting, and distinction from other epigenetic iron oxide deposits: Economic Geology, 105, 641–654.
  9. Hitzman, M.W., Oreskes, N., and Einaudi, M.T., 1992, Geological characteristics and tectonic setting of Proterozoic iron oxide (Cu-U-Au-REE) deposits: Precambrian Research, 58, 241–287.
  10. Jagodzinski, E.A., 2005, Compilation of SHRIMP U–Pb geochronological data – Olympic Domain, Gawler Craton, South Australia, 2001–2003: Geoscience Australia Record 2005/20, 197 pp.
  11. Krneta, S., Cook, N.J., Ciobanu, C.L., Ehrig, K.J., and Kontonikas-Charos, A., 2017, The Wirrda Well and Acropolis prospects, Gawler Craton, South Australia: Insights into evolving fluid conditions through apatite chemistry: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 181, 276-291.
  12. Mark, G., Oliver, N.H.S., and Williams, P.J. 2006, Mineralogical and chemical evolution of the Ernest Henry Fe oxide–Cu–Au ore system, Cloncurry district, northwest Queensland, Australia: Mineralium Deposita 40, 769-801.
  13. McPhie, J., 2016, Acropolis Report (unpublished): BHP Billiton Olympic Dam.
  14. Mortimer, G.E., Cooper, J.A., Paterson, H.L., Cross, K., Hudson, G.R.T., and Uppill, R.K., 1988, Zircon U–Pb Dating in the Vicinity of the Olympic Dam Cu–U–Au Deposit, Roxby Downs, South-Australia: Economic Geology, 83, 694–709.
  15. Verdugo-Ihl, M.R., Ciobanu, C.L., Cook, N.J., Ehrig, K., Courtney-Davies, L., and Gilbert, S., 2017, Textures and U-WSn-Mo signatures in hematite from the Cu-U-Au-Ag orebody at Olympic Dam, South Australia: defining the archetype for IOCG deposits: Ore Geology Reviews, 91, 173–195.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073050
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acropolis; implicit modelling; magnetite-dominant IOCG; statistical analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error