1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The last decade has seen extensive development of Bayesian geophysical inversion methods which produce ensembles of models as outputs. Many of these are limited to producing 1D or very simple and narrow models. It is well established that tying such narrow inversions together using lateral priors can significantly improve inversion results. Such laterally constrained inversion can, however, be complicated to code and add computational overhead. For this reason, available Bayesian geophysical inversion codes often do not include lateral priors as an option. I introduce a simple and easy to use method that allows lateral priors to be added to Bayesian ensemble inversion results as a post-processing step. This method has the potential to extend the use of many existing inversion codes and results. It can significantly reduce computational costs when practitioners want to experiment with different lateral priors. The method is demonstrated using synthetic magnetotelluric data and VTEM data from Cloncurry in Queensland.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073075
2019-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auken, E., Christiansen, A.V., Jacobsen, B.H., Foged, N., and Sorensen, K.I., 2005, Piecewise 1D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data: Geophysical Prospecting, 53(4), 497-506.
  2. Brodie, R. C., 2015, AEM data acquisition and processing: In I. C. Roach (Ed.), The Southern Thomson Orogen VTEMplus AEM survey, Record 29, 35-65. Canberra, ACT: Geoscience Australia.
  3. Brodie, R. C., and Sambridge, M., 2012. Transdimensional Monte Carlo Inversion of AEM data: 22nd International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, 26-29, Brisbane, February 2012.
  4. Green, P.J., 1995, Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination: Biometrika, 82(4), 711-732.
  5. Gunning, J., Glinsky, M.E., and White, C., 2007, Delivery Massager: A tool for propagating seismic inversion information into reservoir models: Computers & Geosciences, 33(5), 630-648.
  6. Gunning, J., Glinsky, M.E., and Hedditch, J., 2010, Resolution and uncertainty in 1D CSEM inversion: A Bayesian approach and open-source implementation: Geophysics, 75(6), F151-F171.
  7. Hauser, J., Gunning, J., Annetts, D., 2015, Probabilistic inversion of airborne electromagnetic data under spatial constraints: Geophysics, 80(2), E135--E146.
  8. Kelbert, A., Meqbel, N., Egbert, G.D., Tandon, K., 2014. ModEM: A modular system for inversion of electromagnetic geophysical data. Computers & Geosciences 66, 40–53.
  9. Sambridge, M., Bodin T., Gallagher, K., and Tkalčić, H., 2013, Transdimensional inference in the geosciences: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371, 20110547.
  10. Seillé, H., Visser, G., 2019. Accounting for a 3D world in 1D magnetotelluric probabilistic inversions. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2019 (this volume).
  11. Wait, J.R., 1962. Theory of magnetotelluric fields. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section D: Radio Propagation 66D, 509.
  12. Xiang, E., Guo, R., Dosso, S.E., Liu, J., Dong, H., and Zhengyong, R., 2018, Efficient hierarchical trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of magnetotelluric data: Geophysical Journal International, 213(3), 1751-1767.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073075
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): geophysical inversion; geostatistics; numerical methods; uncertainty analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error