1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Probabilistic inversions of wide angle reflection and refraction data for crustal velocity models are regularly employed to understand the robustness of velocity models that can be inferred from these data. It is well understood that the uncertainties associated with the picks of individual arrivals contribute to overall model uncertainty. Typically only a modicum of effort is devoted to quantifying uncertainty in the traveltime picks; a constant noise estimate is commonly assigned to a given class of arrivals. Further, determining the class of arrivals is often left to the behest of the interpreter, contributing additional uncertainty to the data that is both difficult to quantify and may be altogether incorrect. Given the crucial role data uncertainty plays in characterising model robustness, there is a need to thoroughly and appropriately quantify uncertainty in the traveltime data which itself is inferred from the waveform. Here we propose a method that treats arrival or phase classification as part of the velocity model building (inversion) framework using the well-established expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073105
2019-12-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, R., 1982, Automatic phase pickers: their present use and future prospects: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72, S225–S242.
  2. Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, 1977, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, 39.
  3. Finlayson, D. M., R. J. Korsch, R. A. Glen, J. H. Leven, and D. W. Johnstone, 2002, Seismic imaging and crustal architecture across the Lachan Transverse Zone, a possible early cross-cutting feature of Eastern Australia: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 49, 311–321.
  4. Fomin, T., and B. R. Goleby, 2006, Lessons from a joint interpretation of vibroseis wide-angle and near-vertical reflection data in the northeastern Yilgarn,Western Australia: Tectonophysics, 420, 301–316.
  5. Goncharov, A., G. O’Brien, and B. Drummond, 2000, Seismic velocities in the north west shelf region, australia, from near-vertical and wide-angle reflection and refraction studies: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 347–352.
  6. Kennett, B. L. N., E. Saygin, T. Fomin, and R. Blewett, 2013, Deep crustal seismic reflection profiling, Australia: 1976-2011.
  7. Myers, S. C., Johannesson, G., and Hanley, W., 2009, Incorporation of probabilistic seismic phase labels into a Bayesian multiple-event seismic locator. Geophysical Journal International, 177(1), 193–204.
  8. Rawlinson, N., A. Fichtner, M. Sambridge, and M. K. Young, 2014, Seismic Tomography and the Assessment of Uncertainty: Advances in Geophysics, 55, 1–76.
  9. Rawlinson, N., S. Pozgay, and S. Fishwick, 2010, Seismic tomography: A window into deep Earth: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 178, 101–135.
  10. Reading, A. M., W. Mao, and D. Gubbins, 2001, Polarization filtering for automatic picking of seismic data and improved converted phase detection: Geophysical Journal International, 147, 227–234.
  11. Xia, J., R. D. Miller, and C. B. Park, 1999, Estimation of near surface shearwave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves: Geophysics, 64, 691–700.
  12. Zelt, C. a., and R. M. Ellis, 1988, Practical and efficient ray tracing in two-dimensional media for rapid traveltime and amplitude forward modeling: Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics, 24, 16–31.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073105
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): data classification; data uncertainty; inversion; machine learning; seismic traveltime
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error