1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

We have quantified the use of finite electric dipole lengths from the point measurement assumptions typical in 3D MT inversion modeling. Electric fields are measured across dipoles of typically 50 m to 200 m at MT soundings. Modeling algorithms, however, normally use point electric field values at the surface of single cells to calculate MT transfer functions. This is perfectly reasonable for the majority of cases, but there are situations with strong shallow variability of resistivity, where measurements may not be simulated well by point electric fields, and detailed information might not be used optimally. We explore the consequences of this omission by quantifying the difference between point solutions and electric field integrations across dipoles in 3D forward calculations for selected cases. The topic ties closely with galvanic distortion and inversion for related parameters, lateral magnetic field variations, and the benefit of providing shallower constraints for the imaging of deeper targets. As a side product, the analysis led us to focus on the fields output from the 3D modeling, and we illustrate electric current systems through the cases analyzed. We observe that in the presence of strong topography and outcropping inhomogeneities, finite dipole solutions can differ considerably from point solutions, while over a variable regolith case the effect appears more contained

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073129
2019-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Jiracek, G.R. [1990] Near-surface and topographic distortions in electromagnetic induction. Surveys in Geophysics, 11(2-3), 163-203.
  2. Jones, A.G. [1988] Static shift of magnetotelluric data and its removal in a sedimentary basin environment. Geophysics, 53(7), 967-978.
  3. Mackie, R. and Watts, M.D. [2012] Detectability of 3-D sulphide targets with AFMAG. SEG 2012 Expanded Abstracts, 1-4.
  4. Mackie, R.L., Miorelli, F., and Meju, M.A., 2018, Practical methods for model uncertainty quantification in electromagnetic inverse problems, SEG Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts.
  5. Meju, M.A., Mackie, R.L., Miorelli, F., and Shahir Saleh, A., 2018, Crossgradient anisotropic 3D CSEM inversion integrated with seismic and well log data to reduce uncertainty, SEG Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts.
  6. Patzer, C., Tietze, K. and Ritter, O. [2018] 3D modelling and inversion using elongated electric field receivers. Extended Abstract, 24th EM Induction Workshop, Helsingør, Denmark.
  7. Pellerin, L. and Hohmann, G.W. [1990] Transient electromagnetic inversion: A remedy for magnetotelluric static shifts. Geophysics, 55(9), 1242-1250.
  8. Scholl, C. and Miorelli, F. [2018] Otze – airborne EM inversion on unstructured model grids. AEM, 7th International Workshop on Airborne Electromagnetics.
  9. Soyer, W., Mackie, R.L. and Miorelli, F. [2018] Optimizing the Estimation of Distortion Parameters in Magnetotelluric 3D Inversion, 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018.
  10. Soyer, W., Mackie, R.L., Hallinan, S., Pavesi, A., Nordquist, G., Suminar, A., Intani, R. and Nelson, C. [2018] Geologically-consistent multiphysics imaging of the Darajat geothermal steam field. First Break, 36(6), 77-83.
  11. Soyer, W., Miorelli, F. and Mackie, R.L. [2018] Considering true layout geometry in magnetotelluric modeling. Extended Abstract, 24th EM Induction Workshop, Helsingør, Denmark.
  12. Soyer, W., Mackie, R. and Miorelli, F. [2017] 3D MT inversion considering galvanic distortion matrices. 13th China International Geo-Electromagnetic Workshop, Wuhan.
  13. Watts, M.D., Mackie, R.L., Scholl, C. and Hallinan S. [2013] Limitations of MT static shift corrections using time-domain EM data. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 681-684.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073129
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D; dipole; distortion; galvanic; inversion; Magnetotellurics; topography
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error