1887
2nd Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference: Data to Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Shale oil and gas is of recent interest in Australia, and the Roseneath, Epsilon and Murteree (REM) shales of the Cooper Basin, Australia, are unconventional gas targets. Shales have a high proportion of porosity in the submicron scale and hydraulic stimulation of USA shales has historically employed high volumes of water with dilute HCl, proppants and various chemicals. Supercritical (sc) CO has also been used as a fracture fluid in water sensitive formations. In addition, shales may contain high concentrations of potentially toxic or regulated components such as U, As, Pb, or BTEX which may be released to production water. Improper disposal or treatment of waste water has caused recent environmental concerns in the USA.

REM shales were characterised with various techniques including high resolution synchrotron XFM for association of metals with specific minerals. Several metals and As were associated with sulphides in coal pores; Mn with siderite, and Pb with pyrite cements. Shales were reacted with dilute HCl or scCO-water +/- SO. The fraction of SANS gas accessible meso-pores was highest in the Epsilon Formation core. Siderite dissolved in HCl reactions, and the fraction of open meso-pores increased. Fe-rich precipitates formed in scCO2 reactions and mesopores partly closed. Mobilised concentrations of Pb, Fe, U, and Na were highest from the reactions with dilute HCl. Understanding the mineral sources of metals and their potential release with different fracture fluids may result in better predictions and mitigation options for production water. Reactions of minerals such as siderite, and sulphides may release regulated metals to production water.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073164
2019-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Annevelink, M.P.J.A., Meesters, J.A.J., Hendriks, A.J., 2016. Environmental contamination due to shale gas development. Science of The Total Environment 550, 431-438.
  2. Melnichenko, Y.B., He, L., Sakurovs, R., Kholodenko, A.L., Blach, T., Mastalerz, M., Radliński, A.P., Cheng, G., Mildner, D.F.R., 2012. Accessibility of pores in coal to methane and carbon dioxide. Fuel 91, 200–208.
  3. PIRSA (Primary Industries and Regions of South Australia), 2007. Petroleum geology of South Australia. Volume 4: Cooper Basin. Report Book 203-09. South Australian Department of Primary Industries and Resources.
  4. Pearce, J.K., Turner, L., Pandey, D., 2018a. Experimental and predicted geochemical shale-water reactions: Roseneath and Murteree shales of the Cooper Basin. International Journal of Coal Geology 187, 30-44.
  5. Pearce, J.K., Dawson, G.K.W., Blach, T.P., Bahadur, J., Melnichenko, Y.B., Golding, S.D., 2018b. Impure CO2 reaction of feldspar, clay, and organic matter rich cap-rocks: Decreases in the fraction of accessible mesopores measured by SANS. International Journal of Coal Geology 185, 79-90.
/content/journals/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073164
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error