1887
ASEG2010 - 21st Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

We noticed during depth processing on real seismic data with fault shadows that:

- Appearance of fault shadows and the convergence speed of the tomographic inversion depend on the acquisition direction;

- Tomographic depth-velocity modelling usually produces models that closely follow geology; but sometimes the models contain odd looking nongeological anomalies; in both cases the depth migration delivers distortion free seismic images;

- Anisotropy in faulted areas creates additional image distortions.

To examine these effects and optimize our depthprocessing workflow, we created several synthetic seismic datasets for different types of velocity anomalies associated with faults in isotropic and anisotropic media and different acquisition directions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041843
2010-12-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Birdus S., 2007, Removing fault shadow distortions by Fault Constrained Tomography. 77th Meeting, SEG, San Antonio, Expanded Abstracts, 3039-3043.
  2. Zhou H., Gray S.H.. Young J., Pham D., Zhang Y., 2003. Tomographic Residual Curvature Analysis: 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Extended Abstracts, 666-669.
/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041843
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): depth imaging; fault; velocity modelling
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error