1887
ASEG2010 - 21st Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Accurate terrain corrections are important for all gravity surveying. In airborne surveys, a digital model of the terrain is constructed and terrain corrections are calculated at each airborne measurement point. Airborne gravity gradiometry is of high spatial resolution and is particularly sensitive to nearby topographic variations, placing particular requirements on the terrain corrections. A combination of mathematical analysis and simulation studies has led to quantification of the requirements: current on-shore, low-level gradiometer surveys require sub-metre accuracy in navigation and in digital terrain model heights; cell sizes (and therefore also topographic sampling) in the terrain model should be about one-third of the ground clearance. The choice of terrain correction density depends on the application and it is important that the interpreter of the corrected gravity data has the ability to test the impact of changes in this density.

Accurate calculation of the gravity gradient field at the airborne sampling points may be achieved by a wide variety of either spatial or harmonic domain methods. Calculation in the harmonic domain is fast but assumes the data represent a periodic function on a planar surface. Padding methods for periodic extension and piecewise continuation away from a plane both add error and slow the calculation. Spatial domain methods are slower but can be sped up by the use of various approximations. In both cases, a clear understanding of accuracy requirements is essential for making an appropriate tradeoff between accuracy and speed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041849
2010-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chen, J., and J. C. Macnae, 1997, Terrain corrections are critical for airborne gravity gradiometer data: Exploration Geophysics, 28, 21–25.
  2. Dransfield, M. H., 1994, Airborne Gravity Gradiometry: PhD. thesis, University of Western Australia.
  3. Dransfield, M. and Zeng, Y., 2009, Airborne gravity gradiometry: Terrain corrections and elevation error: Geophysics, 74, 137-142.
  4. Forsberg, R., 1985, Gravity field terrain effect computations by FFT, Bull. Geod., 59, 342–260.
  5. Guspí, F., 1987, Frequency-domain reduction of potential field measurements to a horizontal plane, Geoexploration, 24, 87-98.
  6. Jekeli, C., and L. Zhu, 2006, Comparison of methods to model the gravitational gradient from topographic data base: Geophysics Journal International, 166, 999–1014.
  7. Kass, M. A., and Y. Li, 2008, Practical aspects of terrain correction in airborne gravity gradiometry surveys: Exploration Geophysics, 39, 198–203.
  8. Naidu, P. S. and Mathew, M. P., 1994, Fast reduction of potential fields measured over an uneven surface to a plane surface, IEEE Trans. Geosci. and Remote Sensing, 32, 508-512.
  9. Parker, R. L., 1972, The rapid calculation of potential anomalies: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 31, 447–455.
  10. Stone, P. M., and A. Simsky, 2001, Constructing high resolution DEMs from airborne laser scanner data: Preview, 93, 99.
/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041849
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AGG; gravity gradiometry.; terrain correction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error