1887
ASEG2010 - 21st Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The focus of this presentation is on new ways to extract information from complex datasets in situations where direct measurement is not possible. Such inverse problems are ubiquitous across the physical and mathematical sciences and are central to discovery of resources within the Earth upon which Australian society is dependent.

A recurring problem is how to choose the number of unknowns with which to fit noisy data. If too few are chosen the data cannot be fit and if too many the inversion results contain unwarranted detail. Statistical methods are often used to find optimal numbers of unknowns, but these are based on simplistic assumptions and typically require multiple trial inversions to be performed with different numbers of variables. A new general approach recently applied to geophysical problems is to ask the data itself `How many unknowns should be used ?’ While this may seem counter-intuitive at first sight it turns out to be entirely feasible. In effect the number of unknowns itself becomes an unknown. An extension of the basic approach also allows the level of noise on the data to also be included as an unknown.

In this presentation we outline the central ideas, and illustrated through an example where a geophysical property varies only in 1-D (usually depth or time) and is constrained from surface measurements. Applications of the general approach are to airborne EM data, borehole geophysics, seismic interpretation and also palaeoclimate reconstructions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041868
2010-12-01
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bodin, T. and Sambridge, M., 2009, Seismic tomography with the reversible jump algorithm, Geophysical Journal International, 178, 1411-1436.
  2. Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., and Gallagher, K., 2009, A selfparameterising partition model approach to tomographic inverse problems, Inverse Problems, 25, 055009, doi:10.1088/0266-5611/25/5/055009, 17th March 2009.
  3. Brodie, R., and Sambridge, M., A holistic approach to inversion of frequency domain airborne EM data, Geophysics, 71, No. 6, pp G301-G312, 2006.
  4. Charvin, K., Gallagher, K., Hampson, G. and Labourdette, R., 2009, A Bayesian approach to infer environmental parameters from stratigraphic data 1: Methodology, Basin Research, 21, 5-25.
  5. Denison, D., Adams, N., Holmes, C. and Hand, D., 2002a, Bayesian partition modelling, Comput. Stat. Data Anal.,38(4), 475–485.
  6. Denison, D., Holmes, C., Mallick, B. and Smith, A., 2002b. Bayesian Nonlinear Methods for Classification and Regression, John Wiley, Chichester.
  7. Gallagher, K., Charvin, Nielsen, S., Sambridge, M., and Stephenson, J., 2009, Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) sampling methods to determine optimal models, model resolution and model choice for Earth Science problems, Marine and Petroeum Geology, 26, 525-535.
  8. Geyer, C. J. and Møller, J. (1994) Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 21, 369-373.
  9. Green, P. J. (1995) Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika, 82, 711-732.
  10. Hopcroft, P., Gallagher, K. and Pain, C.C., 2009, A Bayesian Partition Modelling approach to resolve spatial variability in climate records from borehole temperature inversion, Geophysical Journal International, 178, 651-666.
  11. Malinverno, A. and Briggs, V., 2004. Expanded uncertainty quanti_cation in inverse problems: Hierarchical Bayes and empirical Bayes, Geophysics, 69, 1005.
  12. Sambridge, M., Gallagher, K, Jackson, A and Rickwood, P., 2006, Trans-dimensional inverse problems, Model Comparision and the Evidence, Geophysical Journal International, 167, 528-542, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X2006.03155.x.
  13. Stephenson, J., Gallagher, K. and Holmes, C., 2005, Beyond Kriging – dealing with discontinuous spatial data fields using adaptive prior information and Bayesian Partition modeling, in Curtis, A. and Wood, R. Geological Prior Information: informing Science and Engineering, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publication 239, 195-209
  14. Stephenson, J., Gallagher, K. and Holmes, C. (2006) Low temperature thermochronology and modelling strategies for multiple samples 2 : Partition modeling for 2D and 3D distributions with discontinuities, Earth Planet Sci. Letts. 241, 557-570.
/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041868
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AEM; disocontinuous fields; Geophysical inversion methods; seismic; wireline
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error