1887
ASEG2010 - 21st Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

While data in AEM systems such as VTEM is continuously sampled at 5 or 10 microsecond intervals, conventional processing steps in the past have not provided useful data close to transmitter current turnoff. In historic VTEM data for example, delivered data usually starts many tens or even a hundred microseconds or so after turnoff. Experiments in deconvolution of early time data at high altitude identified that the symptoms of "problem" early-time data were that the underlying cause had a linear phase response, resulting in a consistent "system" exponential response in time-domain. This unwanted or spurious response is experimentally determined to be of variable amplitude, and of either sign, usually reducing the data at early delays, but occasionally enhancing the combined response. A change in processing strategy to specifically identify and subtract this additive spurious response from a valid earth response has led to the extraction of quantitative AEM data at early delays in the 10 to 20 μs range. The process can be applied to historic data. System bandwidth limitations do of course provide a limit to the accurate sampling of the earth response at extremely early delays. More recently, hardware changes have increased the system bandwidth and reduced the need for software corrections to acquired data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041874
2010-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Annan, A.P. 1986. Development of the PROSPECT I airborne electromagnetic system. In: Airborne resistivity mapping, Vol. Paper 86-22 (ed. G.J. Palacky), pp. 63-70. Geological Survey of Canada.
  2. Duncan, A., P Roberts, G., Buselli, G., Pik, J., Williamson, D., Roocke, P., Thorn, R. & Anderson, A. 1992. SALTMAP ? airborne EM for the environment. Exploration Geophysics23, 123-126.
  3. Effersø, F., Auken, E. & Sørensen, K.I. 1999. Inversion of band-limited TEM responses. Geophysical Prospecting47, 551-564.
  4. Huang, H. & Fraser, D.C. 2002. Dielectric permittivity and resistivity mapping using high-frequency, helicopter-borne EM data. Geophysics67, 727-738.
  5. Kurtz, R.D., Macnae, J.C. & West, G.F. 1989. A controlledsource, time-domain electromagnetic survey over an upthrust section of Archean crust in the Kapuskasing Structural Zone. Geophysical Journal International99, 195-204.
  6. Lane, R., Plunkett, C., Price, A., Green, A. & Hu, Y. 1998. Streamed data - a source of insight and improvement for time domain airborne EM. Exploration Geophysics29, 16-23.
  7. Leggatt, P.B. 1996. Some algorithms and code for the computaiton of the step response secondary emf signal for the Spectrem AEM system. PhD thesis, Witwatersrand.
  8. Macnae, J., King, A., Stolz, N., Osmakoff, A. & Blaha, A. 1998. Fast AEM data processing and inversion. Exploration Geophysics29, 163-169.
  9. Spies, B. & Frischknecht, F. 1991. Electromagnetic Sounding. In: Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, Vol. 2 (ed. M. Nabighian), pp. 285-411. SEG.
/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041874
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): airborne; bandwidth; early-time; electromagnetic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error