1887
ASEG2010 - 21st Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The propagation of seismic wave through viscoacoustic media is affected by the attenuation that is caused by the quality factor Q, resulting in significant loss of signal strength and bandwidth. Gas trapped in sediment is an example of such media. Seismic images of geological structures underneath shallow gas often suffer from resolution degradation and the effect of amplitude dimming, making the identification and interpretation of the structures difficult. This in turn affects the ability to accurately predict the reservoir properties. Thus, there is a need to compensate the attenuation anomalies due to Q.

In this paper, we present a workflow of Q estimation and compensation that is based on our previous work on amplitude tomography. Our new approach involves utilizing tomographic inversion for estimating Q from prestack depth migrated common image gathers that fully honours the wavepaths. By filtering the seismic data into different frequency bands and measuring the effect of attenuation on amplitudes in each band, the frequency dependent effect, which was ignored in our previous amplitude tomography work, of attenuation is fully taken into account, thereby allowing Q to be estimated from our tomographic method. By using the estimated Q volume in one of the migration methods that incorporates Q in the traveltime computation, we demonstrate, through realdata examples, that our workflow provides an optimal compensation solution that resolves amplitude, phase and bandwidth distortions due to seismic attenuation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041898
2010-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Best A. I., McCann C. and Sothcott J., 1994, The relationships between the velocities, attenuations and petrophysical properties of reservoir sedimentary rocks: Geophys. Prosp., 42, 151-178.
  2. Bregman N. D., Chapman C. H. and Bailey R. C., 1989. Travel time and amplitude analysis in seismic tomography: J. Geophys. Res., 94, 7577-7587.
  3. Guo J., Zhou H., Young J. and Gray S., 2002, Toward accurate velocity. models by 3D tomographic velocity analysis: 64th Meeting, EAGE, B024.
  4. Hung B., Xin K. F., Birdus S. and Sun J., 2008, 3-D Tomographic amplitude inversion for compensating transmission losses in the overburden: 70th Meeting, EAGE, H004
  5. Keers H., Vasco D. W., and Johnson L. R., 2001,Viscoacoustic crosswell imaging using asymptotic waveforms: Geophysics, 66, 861-870.
  6. Kjartansson E., 1979. Constant Q-wave propagation and attenuation: J.Geophys. Res.82, 4737-4748.
  7. Xie Y., Xin K. F., Sun J. and Notfors C., 2009. 3D prestack depth migration with compensation for frequency dependent absorption and dispersion: submitted to 79th Meeting, SEG.
/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041898
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attenuation; Q factor; tomography
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error