1887
ASEG2010 - 21st Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The exponential increase of seismic velocities with effective stress has usually been explained by the presence of pores with a broad distribution of aspect ratios. More recently, a stress-related closure of soft pores with a narrow distribution of compliances (e.g., grain contacts) has been suggested to be sufficient to explain such exponential stress dependency.

This theoretical interpretation has been verified here using laboratory measurements on dry sandstones. On the basis of these experimental data, linear dependency of elastic compressibility on soft porosity and exponential decay of soft porosity and elastic compressibility with effective stress up to 60 MPa is confirmed.

Soft porosity, estimated from the fitting coefficients of elastic compressibilities, is on the same order of magnitude but slightly lower than obtained from strain measurements. The results confirm applicability of previously proposed stress sensitivity models and provide justification for using this approach to model stress dependency of elastic properties for isotropic and anisotropic rocks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041945
2010-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. De Paula, O.B., Pervukhina M., and Gurevich B., 2008, Role of compliant porosity in stress dependency of ultrasonic velocities in carbonates and sandstones: Proceedings of the third National Geophysical symposium, Belem-Para.
  2. Eberhart-Phillips, D., Han, D.-H., and Zoback, M.D., 1989, Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity and clay content in sandstone: Geophysics, 54(1), 82-89.
  3. Fortin, J., Guéguen, Y., and Schubnel, A., 2007, Effects of pore collapse and grain crushing on ultrasonic velocities and Vp/Vs: J. Geophys. Res., 112, B08207, doi:10.1029/2005JB004005.
  4. Liu, H.-H., Rutqvist, J., and Berryman, J.G., 2008, On the relationship between stress and elastic strain for porous and fractured rock: Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.04.005.
  5. Mavko, G. and Jizba, D., 1991, Estimating grain-scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks: Geophysics, 56(12), 1940-1949.
  6. Mavko, G.M. and Nur, A., 1978, The effect of Nonelloptical Cracks on the Compressibility of Rocks: J. Geophys. Res., 83, 4459-4468, 1978.
  7. Pervukhina, M., Dewhurst, D., Gurevich, B., Kuila, U., Siggins, T., Raven, M., and Nordgård Bolås, H.M., 2008, Stress-dependent elastic properties of shales: measurement and modelling: The Leading Edge, 27(6), 772-779.
  8. Pervukhina, M., Dewhurst, D., Kuila, U., Siggins, T., and Gurevich, B., 2008, Stress Dependent Anisotropy in Shales: Measurements and Modelling: Proceed. SHIRMS, 2, 287-300
  9. Shapiro, S.A., 2003, Elastic piezosensitivity of porous and fractured rocks: Geophysics, 68(2), 482-486.
  10. Shapiro, S.A. and Kaselow, A., 2005, Porosity and elastic anisotropy of rocks under tectonic stress and pore-pressure changes: Geophysics, 70(5), 27-38.
  11. Siggins, A.F. and Dewhurst, D.N., 2003, Saturation, pore pressure and effective stress from sandstone acoustic properties: Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(2), doi: 10.1029/2002GL016143.
  12. Walsh, J., 1965, The effect of cracks on the compressibility of rock: J. Geophys. Res., 70, 381-389.
  13. Zimmerman, R.W., Somerton, W.H., and King, M.S., 1986, Compressibility of porous rocks: J. Geophys. Res., 91, 12,765-12,777.
  14. Zimmerman, R.W., 1991, Compressibility of sandstones: Elsevier, Amsterdam.
/content/journals/10.1081/22020586.2010.12041945
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error